This is the play. They're going to push Ivermectin on late-stage covid-19 cases, heavily publicizing any "failures" with frequent mention of "livestock". If Ivermectin works, you simply won't hear about it.
They did a similar thing with hcq, deliberately administering it too late, in excessive dosages, and/or without zinc. Then they reported that it was dangerous.
Funny thing about Ivermectin: it's very hard to overdose on the stuff. That's how not dangerous it is.
If you administer to someone 20x the protocol dosage of aspirin, I believe that's called a murder attempt. How do the docs get away with 20x any suggested dosages?
But they don't mention it's been approved to treat a number of ailments in humans for years...
There is something about don't get the stuff designed for cows & horses, but they do make packaged doses approved for human use that these articles seem to never mention...
Speaking of 1 variable at a time: I've noticed that numerous studies that "show" masks have a high efficacy against the spread of covid involved test cases that not only introduced masks but also introduced sunlight, additional distancing, therapeutics, and even used particles larger than covid.
It explained why it was my deep blue city had a big report on "25+ studies that show masks are effective" yet I was able to quickly DDG a collection of at least as many studies that show they are not.
Republican NPC types are basically hearing about IVM through the grapevine, and without ever going to the FLCCC site, they are basically just taking mouthfuls of the veterinary stuff when they have a cough or a fever.
The fact that ventilators get involved at all and not corticosteroids, which are a standard first treatment for respiratory issues AND happen to help clear out the S1 spike protein, is all the proof you need that global medicine is captured, top to bottom.
Too late, ventilator means he's probably a goner. Remdesivir + induced coma destroys your immune system, vent destroys lungs, intervention cascade leads to death, but only after many expensive treatments.
Isn't it funny how "unvaccinated" people who die from covid go through this agonizing torture at the hands of doctors, yet we blame a minor flu germ as the sole cause. Meanwhile people who die from the vaccine pretty much just drop dead randomly with no warning, yet we can't make any assumptions. Could have been bigfoot or the loch ness monster for all we know.
This is the play. They're going to push Ivermectin on late-stage covid-19 cases, heavily publicizing any "failures" with frequent mention of "livestock". If Ivermectin works, you simply won't hear about it.
They did a similar thing with hcq, deliberately administering it too late, in excessive dosages, and/or without zinc. Then they reported that it was dangerous.
Funny thing about Ivermectin: it's very hard to overdose on the stuff. That's how not dangerous it is.
The play they did on hcq was also deliberately overdosing patients on it. That’s what led to the Brazil study.
If I remember correctly, the protocol called for 200mg hcq twice per week. The study administered 600mg twice per day. 20 times higher dosage.
If you administer to someone 20x the protocol dosage of aspirin, I believe that's called a murder attempt. How do the docs get away with 20x any suggested dosages?
There are 250,000+ deaths from medical error in the US every year. One or two overdoses won't even register as background noise
That's what dehumanization does.
The most heinous crimes against humanity happen when one group of humans refuses to acknowledge that the other group are also humans.
Brazil
How do I bookmark this specific comment, gahhhhh
But they don't mention it's been approved to treat a number of ailments in humans for years...
There is something about don't get the stuff designed for cows & horses, but they do make packaged doses approved for human use that these articles seem to never mention...
I mean, I am not persuaded that this helps, but this is clearly rank propaganda.
Speaking of 1 variable at a time: I've noticed that numerous studies that "show" masks have a high efficacy against the spread of covid involved test cases that not only introduced masks but also introduced sunlight, additional distancing, therapeutics, and even used particles larger than covid.
It explained why it was my deep blue city had a big report on "25+ studies that show masks are effective" yet I was able to quickly DDG a collection of at least as many studies that show they are not.
Seems perfectly logical.
The fact that ventilators get involved at all and not corticosteroids, which are a standard first treatment for respiratory issues AND happen to help clear out the S1 spike protein, is all the proof you need that global medicine is captured, top to bottom.
Too late, ventilator means he's probably a goner. Remdesivir + induced coma destroys your immune system, vent destroys lungs, intervention cascade leads to death, but only after many expensive treatments.
Isn't it funny how "unvaccinated" people who die from covid go through this agonizing torture at the hands of doctors, yet we blame a minor flu germ as the sole cause. Meanwhile people who die from the vaccine pretty much just drop dead randomly with no warning, yet we can't make any assumptions. Could have been bigfoot or the loch ness monster for all we know.
I thought that Ivermectin only worked when used early on?
Commonly used for people
Water?
Got to spend those turds somehow.