Skill level isn't even what's relevent.
What's relevent is how big an audience wants to see them play. The bigger a stadium you can fill, the more pay-per-views and TV subscriptions, the more ad revenue you can generate... that is what makes athletes rich.
Not skill. Audience attention.
Nobody watches womens' sports other than tennis. And oh, look at that. The female tennis stars are multi-millionaires.
It's like an article with a lie in the headline that buries the truth in the last paragraph. It's a way to lie without completely disregarding the truth, and it's effective because people will see that notice before they see the conclusion of the video.
Why any creator with any kind of following continues to publish to Youtube when they can take their audience anywhere else baffles me.
It's stupid, but yes for anyone who was actually confused this is the reason. It's "algorithmically" determined, which means it's about as fair or unfair as any other algorithms they use, and it's part of a trial run/experiment to basically condition users to think getting FactChecked about everything is normal.
Is anyone actually persuaded by this "fact checking"? Anyone who isn't a leftist knows that anything Big Tech "fact checks" or "debunks" is probably accurate information that the elite finds inconvenient and is looking to censor.
Yup. Old news, back in 2016, the Matildas: Australia's Gold Medal women's soccer folx, lost against an under 16's team... Of boys. 0-7.
No. Really.
It can be hard to find this on goggle, however if you go to duckduckgo, you can find women's magazine sites explaining how important this is. For feminism and the patriarchy, IDK, I don't understand their bullshit.
As soon as they pay 15 year old boys more for kicking their ass.
U15. Pretty sure that means 13 and 14 years olds too(I think, depending on the rules, U15 can also include 15 year olds)
I love that the new cope regarding women's Olympic teams constantly being boat raced by prepubescent boys is the women aren't trying.
Skill level isn't even what's relevent. What's relevent is how big an audience wants to see them play. The bigger a stadium you can fill, the more pay-per-views and TV subscriptions, the more ad revenue you can generate... that is what makes athletes rich.
Not skill. Audience attention.
Nobody watches womens' sports other than tennis. And oh, look at that. The female tennis stars are multi-millionaires.
Do they still play only three sets to the men's five?
As far as I know, yes.
YouTube puts a "fact check" under videos on "controversial" subjects whether the video agrees with the fact check or not.
It's like an article with a lie in the headline that buries the truth in the last paragraph. It's a way to lie without completely disregarding the truth, and it's effective because people will see that notice before they see the conclusion of the video.
Why any creator with any kind of following continues to publish to Youtube when they can take their audience anywhere else baffles me.
Because their audience won't follow them. Ninja's didn't follow him to Mixer.
It's stupid, but yes for anyone who was actually confused this is the reason. It's "algorithmically" determined, which means it's about as fair or unfair as any other algorithms they use, and it's part of a trial run/experiment to basically condition users to think getting FactChecked about everything is normal.
These so called "fact checkers" are nothing but propaganda orgs.
They need to be dealt with.
Snopes rated this as mostly false
Is anyone actually persuaded by this "fact checking"? Anyone who isn't a leftist knows that anything Big Tech "fact checks" or "debunks" is probably accurate information that the elite finds inconvenient and is looking to censor.
Normies probably do, but normies arent watching youtube videos about political subjects so...
As long as they pull smaller audiences, they deserve less pay.
Yup. Old news, back in 2016, the Matildas: Australia's Gold Medal women's soccer folx, lost against an under 16's team... Of boys. 0-7.
No. Really.
It can be hard to find this on goggle, however if you go to duckduckgo, you can find women's magazine sites explaining how important this is. For feminism and the patriarchy, IDK, I don't understand their bullshit.
Why do men soccer players make less than men football players? I guess it is a mystery?
YouTube is using "fact checking" as a kind of nudge to let people know that they're dangerously close to getting deplatformed, perhaps?
Insert "You've had too much to think" poster
Many more men watch sports when compared to women. Men either watch mens sports and bikini girls for womens sports.
These feminists should blame other women for not supporting women in sports.
Seems everything is mens fault.
There's nothing else about her that would influence her behavior? It's solely because she's female?
OY VEY!
No, but a large part of it is because she is a woman. You think thugs are like crabs..lol.
Unrelated: what does this mean?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipg4EL_JUyE