The typical out of Africa story from Science™ is highly disputed and new fossils can radically change it at any time. There is just enough empirical evidence to wildly speculate with reckless abandon.
the number of species in the human family tree has exploded
Early Evolution is actually kind of interesting because of this because we know there were a bunch of hominid species living at the same time. Even in relationship to Neanderthal, there seems to be elements of our genetic code that suggests possible interbreeding took place, which was originally dismissed.
Even in relationship to Neanderthal, there seems to be elements of our genetic code that suggests possible interbreeding took place, which was originally dismissed
Tale as old as time, how to win at survival; marry/fuck/kill.
I saw an explanation of evolution on Japanese TV once that would totally make people crazy if it were aired in America. It showed a world map, and a picture of apes in Africa - then an arrow appeared going from apes to a picture of "ape-men". Then the ape-men evolved and turned into black people. Then another arrow showed how the black people evolved into white people and migrated to Europe, then they evolved again into Asians.
If that's what y'all want OK then we can play that game.
Because every time they have a gotcha of some black person dying, evidence quickly comes out to show that he or she bashed a dude's head into the pavement and was not going to let up until one of them was dead/violently robbed a store and charged the cop/had a history of robbing the village and claiming he was just jogging/stashing dead bodies in cars and sleeping with men who shoot at cops/threatened to shoot a pregnant woman in the womb/stole a taser and shot at the cop/tried to steal a pistol and drove away with someone holding onto the door.
Saying "You did violence against this person" quickly gets explained as to what happened. Much easier to just completely throw out all proceeding evidence and experiences and just point at the color on the headstone.
"Oh my god, my distance ancestors (possibly) were black!? Arrgh! I better start believing in human neurological uniformity and all of its implications." 🙄 They really do lack a theory of mind for the right.
And then when you mention that humans are still apes, they go REEE. Even though they're happy enough to say that "birds are still basically dinosaurs".
The thing is, populations spread, and evolved independently, just like with EVERY OTHER ANIMAL. There was no black Adam and Eve. Just different populations of ape struggling on the plains, and then some moved to temperate forests, and changed how they behaved along with how they looked.
Denial of Evolution is basically a cornerstone the Left and our entire society more generally. No one wants to publicly discuss the reality that different populations of the human animal exist and are quite distinct in their appearance and behavior from one another as a result of evolving in vastly different environments.
and on that shitpiece articles crux is assumption that "adam & even" is root of humanity on whole, instead of being root of tribe in northern-african region we now call jewish (and more you look line; africa is nope on itself but rather clean line area grand ice age formed, aka mediterranean swath of land, both sides of mediterranean sea following same line across russian and asian landscapes + american continent)
adding: i do wonder, did also those genealogist test chinese if they had african gene, or native americans(if there be non-mixed ones left without euro originated genes)
It gets a bit interesting when looking at trade groups. There were likely American tribes and African tribes doing trade with each other, but I don't know when.
most likely not; when landbridge between america and africa existed, there werent much tribes likely doing trading, more like killing one other and plundering, since commercialism didnt exists then, and there wasnt universal languages to use (assuming ofc human race had evolved by then at all)
and also do remember when great ice age happened, most of northern and southern part of planet was covered in thick ice, leaving equator line area where human population could thrive at all
The land bridge theory was squashed years ago. There were people who had been here long before the land bridges existed, and then new peoples arrived after it was long gone. No one can find proof they followed the route taught, and it's a very treacherous journey to try even today. Most fishing trolleys are careful to stay within sight of land.
I gotta go with the others on here. Transatlantic travel would have been all but impossible unless you were going to sale from South Africa, around Antarctica, to Southern Chile, and you would be crossing literally the two most dangerous water routes on Earth.
Sailing straight across would have been suicide.
Even the Vikings had to go around Iceland and Greenland in order to get to Newfoundland. And these were absolute professional sailors, with expert seamanship, with excellent shipbuilding, a huge wealth of resources and knowledge (collected from their many conquests and mercenary actions), and colonies along the way.
The reason the New World was discovered is because the Age of Sail (resulting from the sequestration of the Silk Road due to the Ottomans) created the greatest sailing civilizations in all of human history.
Now there is discussion about possible Pacific Islander trade with South America, and that would be cool, but it still would be an enormous task.
There is a tribe in Nigeria that has a bunch of cultural isms from the Americas, including a legend about boats. They even point with their lips. Early conquistadors had reports that tribes in the Americas knew about Africans and even did trade with them.
The Polynesians probably traded with the Americas in three separate migrations. Hau'ofa, a famous Polynesian philosopher, pointed out they traveled the oceans with supplies and people for colonies and trade, but people studying them thought it was blind luck. This is a people that can stick their hand in the water and know where they are. By all records and signs, the Pacific Islanders probably stopped their migration in the 1500's while Spain began exploring the New World.
It looks like the expansive trade groups began to wither, and it was part of the reason why Europeans began exploring. The entire world was contracting and it meant the spices, gems, and other riches couldn't arrive in European hands. They didn't know this, but the explorers were trying to counter a thing that archaeologists and historians have barely acknowledged the last few years.
Then CRT decided to turn it all into we was kangz and it made the research even harder. Far worse, most departments studying these migrations are closing down.
The human species may have originated from East Africa, but that does not mean that non-sub-Saharan-Africans are descended from sub-Saharan-Africans (bantu). Bantu split off from the rest of the human population around 40,000 years ago and have been evolving separately since then. This separate evolution becomes obvious when scientists go genetic analyses of human populations. Whatever progenitor population of humans that everyone came from (including the bantu) no longer exists. So the article from "Scientific" American is just another leftist lie to mislead people to believing that Bantu are everyone's ancestors.
Heh, nope. Caucasians are Neanderthalus crossbreeds. That's why we're smarter and can handle cold weather so much better. Different skull shapes(and bones in general), the list goes on.
Taxonomically speaking, blacks wouldn't even be considered the same species if we couldn't interbreed.
Now do projected human evolutionary phenotypes, particularly involving melanin production, in post planet populations where artificial shielding from structures will mean human bodies no longer have any reason to produce darker skin types.
So which is it? I thought white supremacists believed they were more evolved than other races. Hence why calling people monkeys or apes was so racially controversial. So is this article about attacking Christians/Creationism? It certainly looks that way. It's not about evolution except as a byproduct of attacking those evil whites and their evil religions.
In literal interpretations of the Christian Bible, white skin was created in God's image.
I thought the "Christian bible" was the New Testament? Do they mean the Judeo-Christian bible? Where does it talk about skin color in the bible anyways? I thought ancient peoples had no concept of race until Americans created it to justify slavery of blacks (and subjugation of the Irish and Italians)?
As the biblical story goes, the curse or mark of Cain for killing his brother was a darkening of his descendants' skin.
Where in the bible does it say this? I grew up in the Bible Belt and I've never met anyone who actually believes this and never saw this pointed out chapter and verse. I've met plenty of racists of all colors, creeds, religions, species, but none who became that way because of muh bible.
For too long, a vocal minority of creationists has hijacked children’s education, media and book publishing.
And for far too long a vocal minority of r-words have hijacked children’s education, media and book publishing, as well as science education.
It’s common knowledge that some school boards, especially in the South, have fought long and hard to keep evolution out of school textbooks.
When I was in school I remember flipping through my biology textbook and seeing references to evolution and I was curious as to how people would react when we got to it. We learned about it just like anything else and no one gave a shit.
If you go on Amazon and look up “children’s books on evolution” you will find about 10–15 relevant titles. This is in contrast to the hundreds of children’s books on other scientific subjects such as chemistry, astronomy and other less controversial subjects. I found only one book on evolution for preschoolers, called Grandmother Fish. The author had to self-fund the book through Kickstarter.
Maybe kids don't care? A kid gets a chemistry set they can do all kinds of cool things. A kid learns astronomy they can go outside and look at the stars and see constellations. A kid gets an electronics hobby kit they can build a radio. How can a curious kid apply what they learn from a children's book on evolution? Is it evil white people, Christian creationists, the patriarchy, the boogeyman etc. etc. etc. preventing kids from wanting books about evolution and not because they serve no practical value?
Why does it seem like every article like this about evolution always brings out people who have an axe to grind against Christianity? How can religious nut jobs be expected to leave religion out of the classroom when these fucking monkeys can't? 😏
These dark skinned early people laid down the foundation for human culture. Considering the short life span of our early ancestors, these original innovators were probably also very young. No one who follows artistic trends will be surprised to learn that, from the beginning, human culture was essentially invented by teenagers. And by culture I don’t just mean the arts, I mean the whole shebang. --- Those Young Black men shooting up America are their heirs of course, how dare you think otherwise. Out of Africa is not the same thing as out of Africans either.
The typical out of Africa story from Science™ is highly disputed and new fossils can radically change it at any time. There is just enough empirical evidence to wildly speculate with reckless abandon.
Early Evolution is actually kind of interesting because of this because we know there were a bunch of hominid species living at the same time. Even in relationship to Neanderthal, there seems to be elements of our genetic code that suggests possible interbreeding took place, which was originally dismissed.
Tale as old as time, how to win at survival; marry/fuck/kill.
Came here to say exactly that.
I saw an explanation of evolution on Japanese TV once that would totally make people crazy if it were aired in America. It showed a world map, and a picture of apes in Africa - then an arrow appeared going from apes to a picture of "ape-men". Then the ape-men evolved and turned into black people. Then another arrow showed how the black people evolved into white people and migrated to Europe, then they evolved again into Asians.
If that's what y'all want OK then we can play that game.
No, dont take away my n-word pass. I waz a negroid n sheeeit!
This "bodies" shit is so dehumanizing, I can't comprehend why are they doing it.
Because every time they have a gotcha of some black person dying, evidence quickly comes out to show that he or she bashed a dude's head into the pavement and was not going to let up until one of them was dead/violently robbed a store and charged the cop/had a history of robbing the village and claiming he was just jogging/stashing dead bodies in cars and sleeping with men who shoot at cops/threatened to shoot a pregnant woman in the womb/stole a taser and shot at the cop/tried to steal a pistol and drove away with someone holding onto the door.
Saying "You did violence against this person" quickly gets explained as to what happened. Much easier to just completely throw out all proceeding evidence and experiences and just point at the color on the headstone.
If we are all descended from black people does that give all the pass to say "nigger"?
Yes
"Oh my god, my distance ancestors (possibly) were black!? Arrgh! I better start believing in human neurological uniformity and all of its implications." 🙄 They really do lack a theory of mind for the right.
And then when you mention that humans are still apes, they go REEE. Even though they're happy enough to say that "birds are still basically dinosaurs".
The thing is, populations spread, and evolved independently, just like with EVERY OTHER ANIMAL. There was no black Adam and Eve. Just different populations of ape struggling on the plains, and then some moved to temperate forests, and changed how they behaved along with how they looked.
Denial of Evolution is basically a cornerstone the Left and our entire society more generally. No one wants to publicly discuss the reality that different populations of the human animal exist and are quite distinct in their appearance and behavior from one another as a result of evolving in vastly different environments.
I estimated the percentage of people of each race/ethnic group that don't believe humans evolved using the Pew Research's Religious Landscape Survey. My results;
Other/Mixed: 37%
White: 34%
Black: 33%
Latino: 33%
Asian: 26%
So, if this is white supremacy, why does every group except Asians have a similar level of belief in it?
and on that shitpiece articles crux is assumption that "adam & even" is root of humanity on whole, instead of being root of tribe in northern-african region we now call jewish (and more you look line; africa is nope on itself but rather clean line area grand ice age formed, aka mediterranean swath of land, both sides of mediterranean sea following same line across russian and asian landscapes + american continent)
adding: i do wonder, did also those genealogist test chinese if they had african gene, or native americans(if there be non-mixed ones left without euro originated genes)
It gets a bit interesting when looking at trade groups. There were likely American tribes and African tribes doing trade with each other, but I don't know when.
most likely not; when landbridge between america and africa existed, there werent much tribes likely doing trading, more like killing one other and plundering, since commercialism didnt exists then, and there wasnt universal languages to use (assuming ofc human race had evolved by then at all)
and also do remember when great ice age happened, most of northern and southern part of planet was covered in thick ice, leaving equator line area where human population could thrive at all
The land bridge theory was squashed years ago. There were people who had been here long before the land bridges existed, and then new peoples arrived after it was long gone. No one can find proof they followed the route taught, and it's a very treacherous journey to try even today. Most fishing trolleys are careful to stay within sight of land.
I doubt that. Neither side had vessels capable of making a round trip across the Atlantic, just rivercraft and coastal craft.
I gotta go with the others on here. Transatlantic travel would have been all but impossible unless you were going to sale from South Africa, around Antarctica, to Southern Chile, and you would be crossing literally the two most dangerous water routes on Earth.
Sailing straight across would have been suicide.
Even the Vikings had to go around Iceland and Greenland in order to get to Newfoundland. And these were absolute professional sailors, with expert seamanship, with excellent shipbuilding, a huge wealth of resources and knowledge (collected from their many conquests and mercenary actions), and colonies along the way.
The reason the New World was discovered is because the Age of Sail (resulting from the sequestration of the Silk Road due to the Ottomans) created the greatest sailing civilizations in all of human history.
Now there is discussion about possible Pacific Islander trade with South America, and that would be cool, but it still would be an enormous task.
There is a tribe in Nigeria that has a bunch of cultural isms from the Americas, including a legend about boats. They even point with their lips. Early conquistadors had reports that tribes in the Americas knew about Africans and even did trade with them.
The Polynesians probably traded with the Americas in three separate migrations. Hau'ofa, a famous Polynesian philosopher, pointed out they traveled the oceans with supplies and people for colonies and trade, but people studying them thought it was blind luck. This is a people that can stick their hand in the water and know where they are. By all records and signs, the Pacific Islanders probably stopped their migration in the 1500's while Spain began exploring the New World.
It looks like the expansive trade groups began to wither, and it was part of the reason why Europeans began exploring. The entire world was contracting and it meant the spices, gems, and other riches couldn't arrive in European hands. They didn't know this, but the explorers were trying to counter a thing that archaeologists and historians have barely acknowledged the last few years.
Then CRT decided to turn it all into we was kangz and it made the research even harder. Far worse, most departments studying these migrations are closing down.
The human species may have originated from East Africa, but that does not mean that non-sub-Saharan-Africans are descended from sub-Saharan-Africans (bantu). Bantu split off from the rest of the human population around 40,000 years ago and have been evolving separately since then. This separate evolution becomes obvious when scientists go genetic analyses of human populations. Whatever progenitor population of humans that everyone came from (including the bantu) no longer exists. So the article from "Scientific" American is just another leftist lie to mislead people to believing that Bantu are everyone's ancestors.
Heh, nope. Caucasians are Neanderthalus crossbreeds. That's why we're smarter and can handle cold weather so much better. Different skull shapes(and bones in general), the list goes on.
Taxonomically speaking, blacks wouldn't even be considered the same species if we couldn't interbreed.
I thought white people were created by Dr. Yakub?
Now do projected human evolutionary phenotypes, particularly involving melanin production, in post planet populations where artificial shielding from structures will mean human bodies no longer have any reason to produce darker skin types.
So which is it? I thought white supremacists believed they were more evolved than other races. Hence why calling people monkeys or apes was so racially controversial. So is this article about attacking Christians/Creationism? It certainly looks that way. It's not about evolution except as a byproduct of attacking those evil whites and their evil religions.
I thought the "Christian bible" was the New Testament? Do they mean the Judeo-Christian bible? Where does it talk about skin color in the bible anyways? I thought ancient peoples had no concept of race until Americans created it to justify slavery of blacks (and subjugation of the Irish and Italians)?
Where in the bible does it say this? I grew up in the Bible Belt and I've never met anyone who actually believes this and never saw this pointed out chapter and verse. I've met plenty of racists of all colors, creeds, religions, species, but none who became that way because of muh bible.
And for far too long a vocal minority of r-words have hijacked children’s education, media and book publishing, as well as science education.
When I was in school I remember flipping through my biology textbook and seeing references to evolution and I was curious as to how people would react when we got to it. We learned about it just like anything else and no one gave a shit.
Maybe kids don't care? A kid gets a chemistry set they can do all kinds of cool things. A kid learns astronomy they can go outside and look at the stars and see constellations. A kid gets an electronics hobby kit they can build a radio. How can a curious kid apply what they learn from a children's book on evolution? Is it evil white people, Christian creationists, the patriarchy, the boogeyman etc. etc. etc. preventing kids from wanting books about evolution and not because they serve no practical value?
Why does it seem like every article like this about evolution always brings out people who have an axe to grind against Christianity? How can religious nut jobs be expected to leave religion out of the classroom when these fucking monkeys can't? 😏
These dark skinned early people laid down the foundation for human culture. Considering the short life span of our early ancestors, these original innovators were probably also very young. No one who follows artistic trends will be surprised to learn that, from the beginning, human culture was essentially invented by teenagers. And by culture I don’t just mean the arts, I mean the whole shebang. --- Those Young Black men shooting up America are their heirs of course, how dare you think otherwise. Out of Africa is not the same thing as out of Africans either.
Denying evolution is just sign of being a retard. Be it stormfag SJW or the current retard SJWness.
Yeah I've noticed he's only here to spam and shill his shit "OC".
Can you show me, with crayons, where my face hurt your feefees?
Me too! I need to know what caused your hurt.