I was talking with my step-brother (far-left tech IPO in NYC) the other day about cooking and something he mentioned caught me by surprise. He was talking about cooking and how this new channel had picked up a bunch of chefs who were racially discriminated against by Delish? and we’re getting paid far less than their peers. So they switched over and made their own program that had been doing well. The baseline of this is of course that is good because if they can do better elsewhere they should. However what struck me as odd is that the accused channel is far left, in fact it would be hard to find any large cooking channel that isn’t pro whatever wokeness is currently on display.
This discussion triggered a realization in the mentality of the far-left, their projection on who they view as lessers (conservatives) is not directed by the actions of conservatives but by the actions of who they consider similar. So if a far left supporting business is caught having rampant racism or sexism their immediate reaction is how much worse conservatives must be. This is amplified by the fact that liberals often do not understand why conservatives value what they value, they only understand what they are told they value by other liberals.
They NEED racism because they have no platform without it.
They are the racists. Karl "nigrilla" Marx, US Democrat slave plantations.
If racism stopped existing, a lot of race pimps would be out of a job.
It's similar to why the pink ribbon foundation raises money primarily for "awareness" lmfao.
You have to wear the ribbon.
I always ask people on the left, “Which side calls blacks Oreos, Uncle Toms and coons anytime they don’t agree with them politically again?”
When discussing crime stats once, a person said, "if you're helping a cat out of a tree you can't get mad if it scratches you."
This person believes themselves to be anti-racist.
The level of mental gymnastics to come so close, yet still miss the mark is baffling. They all but admit they think so little of their pet groups, that they literally compare them to animals. "White Man's Burden 2.0" is what I've taken to referring to what these clowns call "privilege".
https://archive.is/8BVgA An archive to a relevant wikipedia. Because fuck wikipedia, but I'm too lazy to search for anything else right now.
Pure reality.
Liberals do not care a single bit about racism, other than for the power it allows them to wield over you. Their diatribes are just mouth-noises they make to force you to submit. They believe none of it. Look at their actions. ignore their words.
The LEFT are the real racists!
Please just shut up about it already. Nobody cares. They don't care. Everyone here already knows this. Stop legitimizing their moral framework. Stop attempting to attack leftists from a leftist frame of mind. It will literally never work, they don't care about hypocrisy, it's only their tribe is right and yours is wrong.
Be proud to be a racist misogynist bigot. It's human nature to be wary of the Other.
Attempting to attack the left by going, "No u", only implicitly accepts their moral framework as correct and makes you look like a petulant child.
This isn’t a no u. It’s an observation on mentality, and a hypothesis on why this mentality exists. We have seen time and time again when someone deplugs it is due to the fact they have a opus moment where the diatribes of their usual persuaders is caught in a logical fallacy. Things like the Democrat primary rigging in 2016 and 2020, where even basic math analysis shows there was tampering. Understanding how others perceive and rationalize their opinions is necessary because it makes it easier defeat their argument. In this case their heavy in group biases make any attempt at rational discussions by a labeled “conservative” moot because they are viewed as lesser beings, therefore incapable of the superior understanding that the leftist engages in. So the challenge becomes how do we change the paradigm so they believe that the discourse is being conducted by an equal or superior.
Camps.
Unfortunately that's how it is going to end. We live in two separate realities and people don't take well to the whole, "your entire worldview is fundamentally flawed" truth. If they come to it on their own, sometimes they can come to terms with the fact that they've been lied to their entire life. But they will vehemently oppose anyone from the outgroup trying to lead them to that realization.
Again, it's tribal nature. My tribe good no matter what. Education, which ideally teaches thinking skills should let people overcome this, but education doesn't teach people to think anymore. It's been subverted into "repeat the lines you've been told," which only further fuels tribalism.
By ignoring their frame and premises and having values and standards.
If someone for example notices forced integration made their neighborhood less safe and the schools worse, they aren't "racist" for pointing that out and saying they wish their neighborhood was as it was before the forced integration. But as we saw when ConInc tried to dunk on Joe Biden for being against bussing back in the 70s, they will accept the left's frame that it is the Federal government's job to force racial integration at gunpoint in a misguided attempt to score a cheap political point their opposition won't even care about.
Same as with gay marriage which ConInc now supports, and coming soon trannies thanks to Bruce Jenner's political career (which even if he bombs for being a few years ahead of his time is coming soon to an election near you).
A better question is: why should they believe the discourse is being conducted by an equal or superior when they can make their opposition defend something they once opposed with equal fervor to what they're opposing today?
He makes a good point but I don’t even bother trying to discuss this with people anymore
I'm not going to be a reactionary, and justify literally all of their narratives about me.
I'm going to reject their narratives, shove their rhetoric back in their mouths, and tell them that no communist has the right to judge me.
Rejection of a disease is fine, when you are not plagued by it. At the end of the day we are either stuck with eradicating the disease through force, intercepting the disease, or finding a way for the diseased to accept they are diseased. The first two are clearly not possible currently, but the third could be applied through applying subtle thought pathogens into the diseased mind. This of course runs risks the same as any process but can bring a greater result.
I don't agree with your assessment, because you're not dealing with a disease, you're dealing with people and it requires a different approach.
It specifically requires the anti-Left developing high integrity, individualist, disciplined, long-time preferences, men capable of building the culture and civilization we need instead of fighting for scraps of power among dying Leftist institutions. We will supplant their failing structures.
Besides the fact that "liberal" is a PR propaganda term for people that don't exist, this is literally true.
Leftists are psychos. that frequently lie and make up fake oppressors so they can be violently mad at. It is the leftists natural state.
https://archive.ph/8B9ve https:// www. firstthings. com/article/2020/10/suicide-of-the-liberals
https://archive.ph/pVaiZ https://notthebee.com/article/most-utterly-insane-video-you-will-see-today-guaranteed
https://archive.ph/jUomZ
https://archive.ph/n42pL https:// www. youtube. com/watch?v=_OKfOThRqog
https://archive.ph/N3Qwu
https://archive.ph/r2L4o https://thefederalist.com/2021/06/07/health-care-journal-publishes-research-calling-whiteness-a-parasitic-condition-without-permanent-cure/
https://archive.ph/eEWK8 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8460059/Cambridge-University-backs-academic-tweeted-White-Lives-Dont-Matter.html
https://archive.ph/7QxBp https:// bariweiss. substack. com/p/the-psychopathic-problem-of-the-white
https://archive.ph/exS3f http:// features. yaledailynews. com/blog/2020/10/29/its-terrifying-students-say-racism-runs-rampant-at-school-of-nursing/
Most clear recent example was the rioting and looting. How dare you tell these people that destroying property is a bad thing.
Yes, I think all of us notice this at some point. Ryan Long's comedy is no joke.
My non-expert observation is that this is Carl Jung's "shadow self" at work. We all have "bad thoughts" (anything inconsistent with our "normal" programming) from time to time, and they need to be reconciled into our consciousness somehow. In this example bad thoughts might be noticing crime statistics and news and thinking "I don't want to live in an all minority community", or wanting to cross to the other side of the street when a creepy looking black dude walks by. We all reconcile those thoughts in different ways. Many just treat them as random mental noise or imaginations and ignore, while others easily fit them into their world view or rationalize them away as reasonable conclusions from simple pattern recognition. Thoughts from our shadow self are either made to fit our bias, or are thrown out. Most people will do this reconciliation at a subconscious level so they never notice a cognitive-dissonance in the first place.
"Liberals", on the other hand, absolutely refuse to embrace the shadow self. They can't have bad thoughts. I'm a good person. So they project their ideas onto the "other". Any negative thoughts are just interpreted as reasonable fear and loathing of the Devil that their culture has created: the conservative, Republican, white supremacist boogey man. The shadow becomes form. In creating an "other", they have cleansed themselves of the shadow self. Without acknowledging they ever did anything wrong in the first place, they are absolved of sin. Any racist thoughts they do admit to are a byproduct of the white supremacist country they grew up in, so they might embrace woke ideology as a continued penance.
Extreme liberalism is a mental disorder.
It's because deep down all liberals understand that this is just a ploy used for control. It's a mental game used for victory or domination. The point is to elevate themselves while feeding scraps to their minority pets. The purpose of controlling minorities is to use them as a weapon against conservative whites to gain financial or political power over them.
It's more like racism or sexism on their side doesn't gain them anything, so why would they pursue it? They don't really care about those two things. They jump on Republicans for them because it gives them power.
They don't really understand or care about conservatives at all. They understand them as caricatures, exaggerated mental fabrications that they can project their own evil actions onto, thereby relieving themselves of guilt or anxiety over their own behavior.
Notice how Antifa/Communists are often made up of the misfit kids of rich parents? The kids both hate and feel guilty over the money and opportunity they had, and they project their hatred of their parents onto conservatives who enabled them to enrich themselves by supporting "the system". The system which stole their childhoods from them. (they can't consciously blame their parents)
Leftism has always been about not facing reality and lying to yourself about the problems you are having. That's why they are all so mentally ill and angry. They don't even have awareness of where their anger is coming from because they are too busy being victims and blaming all external things for their problems. (other people, conservatives, the environment, etc)
Ed Dwight washed out of astronaut training in the early 60s, and the military tried to railroad Chuck Yeager for it. Had Yeager not gone way above and beyond what he did for pretty much anyone else trying to help him, they might have succeeded.
It's always been the way it is now: if a White doesn't like the "content of character" of a non-White it's because of secret racism. And how do you prove you aren't a secret racist? About the only way you can do it is to assume a priori that all races are the same, because any observable difference could be the result of secret racism. Then you use statistics to determine whether or not someone treats different races differently in a statistically significant way. Which could also be because there are statistical differences between races, but because we've declared a priori that can't happen, it must be due to secret racism.
Enter the Disparate Impact Hypothesis, the prevailing dogma of American race relations since the Civil Rights Act and the core premise that underlies modern conceptions that "structural racism" is the cause of discrepancies in outcome between racial groups.
As Jordan Peterson likes to say "it couldn't be any other way than how it is".
But of course they only apply it one way.
The NBA is 85-90% black simply because black people are better at basketball.
Hockey is 85-90% white because of systemic racism.
I've actually heard them try to blame systemic racism for basketball too. "They're too poor to play anything else. All you need is a ball; and all the public parks have courts where they can play for free".
Liberals don't believe this. Only Useful Idiot Leftists who call themselves Liberals because they think Democratic Socialism is Liberal. They believe this because because Progressive Racialism has absolutely been on a tear on the Left and are actively institutionalizing Racialism and Segregationism at a fairly alarming rate, so much so that they got caught by their own anti-Racialism laws enacted decades ago.
That being the case, the Left are absolutely racist, and actively more racist.
I've met white racists in real life, and they're just generic bigots. They're typically not even white supremacists, they just hate one specific group of people for one reason or another (typically a personal experience).
Now, Racialism is explicitly a Leftist Ideology. In fact, I'd say the majority of all Racialism that isn't White Racialism, is openly Leftist. However, of the White Racialists that you will find, the vast and sweeping majority openly identify with the Left. Only White Leftist subversives like White National Socialists and White Fascists argue that they are "right wing" simply because they are anti-Bolshevik.
Even if we pretend that being anti-Bolshevik is all you needed to be not a Leftist, and we pretend that the NatSocs and Fascists are right-wing, you still find that the majority of open racialists, advocating for open racial discrimination, are almost universally Leftist.
Even when it comes to Anti-Jewishness, the majority can still be found on the Left, but they tend to keep it quietly under the radar because being anti-Jewish is a major narrative that they use against the right, despite many socialists being inherently anti-Jewish from the basis of what Capitalism is defined as under Marxism. Especially when you start adding the Islamists and non-White Racialists into the picture. Then even the anti-Jewishness of the Left is barely contained.
This is an important thing for you to recognize. The Leftists are never talking to you, only to themselves.
Frankly, this is a basis for a lot of their prejudice. I'd say this is easiest to point out among Feminists.
Why do Feminists hate men? The Feminsits believe that the best a man can be, even the bare minimum a man should be is a Feminist. A male Feminist. A male Feminist is the bare minimum a man should be, and he's a creepy cuttle-fish style sex-crime time-bomb waiting to go off. Well, if that's the bare minimum a man can be, imagine how much more terrible a conservative man must be. Worse, an anti-Feminist man!
They don't realize that their Feminism is the problem, and that the rest of us are better than even the above average male feminist. Most men are respectable, and not creepy, weak-willed, sex-pests.
Now apply this... everyone they interact with.
On and on and on.
They hate these abstract groups, because they hate each-other, and each-other is the best that group can ever be.
When I wrote this it was more on the mindset of the standard leftist voter/believer. We have troves of documentation that show the minds behind these movements are pushing them to destabilize our current government system. The average liberal believes that because even they have racist thoughts the other side must be far worse. This is, at least in my opinion, due to the extreme insulation mentality that collective thought occurs in. If a woke white person has “racist” thoughts, and they are told by x group they associate with that the conservative way of life is causing systemic injustices then it is natural they view that lifestyle as lesser.
Yeah, I'd basically agree with all of that.
My liberal friend told me over dinner the other day how nice Utah is because they don't have black people. kek
Hello, Based Department? Did he say it in so many words or was it phrased differently, because you can say as much about places like Vermont as well. There's a very clear reason why Montpelier and Salt Lake City are better places to live than Chicago and Baltimore.
Well yeah it was kind of worse. He was like “Utah is so clean and nice cause they don’t have any black people. Except some came from New Orleans after Katrina and a lot of people are pissed about it”. Lol. He had some family there. He more leans left he is not very in to politics. His girlfriend baby mama is lefty tho, back when I still had FB I remember she posted “I’m so tired of old white men” and all I could think was bitch you about to have a baby with one lol.
On thing conservatives value is preserving their way of life. Leftist enclaves do a very good job of detecting threats to their way of life (conservatives, traditional Christians, large families) and neutralizing the threat.
Meanwhile the "conservatives" are busy declaring people in their movement "racist" for wondering aloud whether all ethnicities contribute their proportional share to the building and continued maintenance of society.
One wonders who's more deserving of the title "conservative".
Hilariously true.
My mom got her wallet stolen a few weeks back (her own fault, but still sucks) - and in the heat of the moment she let her racism slip out. This is a super progressive "love everyone" "Trump is a racist" "Orange Man Bad" "<Repeat MSM>" woman --
--by the time I was speaking to her she was ranting about how she should have profiled the thieves better - she knew it was weird for a black guy to be looking at rice, etc etc etc.
Lil' racist ol' trump supporting me had to say "whoa, now, don't you think that's a bit racist?"
(She'll get all the erroneous charges on her cards back - so don't think I'm heartless)
Oh god, tell me it's not that obnoxious and toxic human Sohla El-waylly...
The bon appetit shit is so funny. Bunch of brown people upset that the fan favorites by a mile were a charming and talented white man and woman. The entire audience is leftist "anti-racists", yet the only videos that got real views/engagement were Brad's and Claire's. Brad/Claire even acted like supplicants to the brown people, they still got devoured and rejected. These people hate you and want you dead lmao
Hah! I've never really watched bon appetit channel. I just looked at their Youtube channel, and they've got a very ..diverse.. lineup of chefs. Every video with Brad crushes every other video's views. That's just sad.
I highly reccomend any video with Brad or Claire. They are passionate about food and charismatic-they truly deserve their popularity.
Brad makes all these cool fermented items and travels places, Claire tries to recreate name brand candy/pastries from scratch.
You guys ever figure a Pro-choice feminist who wanders too close to the truth about abortions NEEDS evil woman-hating Conservatives to exist or her brain will break from all the baby deaths she's supporting? This is like that.
There was some feel-good article making the rounds about a month ago that (IIRC) was talking about how this woman almost aborted her daughter who is now doing some socially positive thing with her life, and the left was fuming because how dare you suggest there might be downsides to abortion.
Tolerance is the Motte to the Bailey of acceptance and celebration.
Yes. Jung was right
It's an interesting thought that makes sense. The left thinks about everything relative to some sort of social group: black people, white people, women, lesbians, trannies, etc. Splitting people up into groups and then picking out which ones are good and bad is really their entire platform. They want you to use these things as a factor when making decisions. Yes, I will go eat there because it's owned by a black person. I will buy that game because they virtue signaled for homos. I will vote for that leftist because they are a woman.
I think the right thinks in a lot more of a business sense. At least the people on the right not necessarily the politicians. Does this person have my interests at heart? Can they do a good job for me? Things like that. Their oppression group is a non-factor. If anything if it's becoming a factor it's because the left just won't shut the hell up about it.
Racism was invented by the communist Leon Trotsky to stifle dissent against the State, and that's how it's been used for the last 100 years. Liberals aren't racist, racism isn't real, it was never real. It isn't real even today. Democrats aren't the real racists because that's like saying Santa Claus is the real Tooth Fairy.
I love your point that the people who were unhappy with what they were doing and where they were working chose to leave and take their talents elsewhere. More people should do this, putting their money where their mouth is if they don't feel fairly compensated. Of course, often times the "unfair stealing bosses" provide something useful, be it money and supplies, experience, and favorable ability to market what they do. But if these chefs are willing to buy their own gear and edit their own videos at their own risk as opposed to a more consistent, but lesser peak rate of profit, power to them.
Exactly, I have not reason to be mad at a group of people striking out on their own, especially if they are getting fucked over, that’s the beauty of free market enterprise.
liberals dont care about racism, they have just found out that it is an effective tool for controlling people. Both minority populations, and by calling those "racists" who do not agree with their political views.
OP, Liberals openly admit this.
In fact, a huge part of their ideology involves admitting it; 'All white people are racist' logically includes the white person saying it. When you see some white person nodding enthusiastically and saying 'Yes, ALL OF US!'... well, ignoring the 95% chance that that person is Jewish, their admission isn't just a virtue signal. They believe it, because they can think of all the times they conciously discriminate based on race. It's not a coincidence that these people always live in the whitest-white gated communities and secured apartment complexes where great lengths are gone to to ensure the local negro population can't get within 50 feet of them without the cops being called.
Liberals believe racism is an ever-growing issue because they are told to think this by the establishment and they’re incapable or unwilling to challenge the establishment and think for themselves.
The establishment, on the other hand, needs racism to exist because that’s how they maintain their political power… by keeping the disadvantaged weak and dependent and susceptible to bribes while tearing down the confidence of the opposition through guilt.
A suggested -ism alleging the hatred of other races...what's the suggested -ism for loving ones own race? There's none. A rhetorical trick to cause conflict without allowing defense against miscegenation; which targets all so called races.