As much as now people argue about loli here, I don't think someone like this should represent anyone and form the laws. I'm sorry, but "oh, my husband just likes to FANTASIZE about children having sex" rings even worse when you know his dad DID rape an actual child. Like at this point he should be careful about these things.
Eeeespecially if he is trying to have a political career.
You can't choose your dad. You can choose to stop supporting him if he does something so fucked. You can also choose not to marry another person with the same messed up fetish.
Would be? He is 100% a dude. Doesn't even try. I used to date a dude who had longer hair than that and he didn't claim to be a woman (but was much better looking). That's all of Aimee's effort. Growing hair.
A separate point to note - that's the husband of the reddit mod. The reddit mod's father was sentenced to 22 years imprisonment for the rape and torture of children.
goes on to say it's no different than a child pretending to slay dragons
In the mind of a child (and possibly many adults), the act of slaying a dragon is a sort of ultimate good. Dragons cause only strife and harm, by legend. To slay a dragon is to do a great service to your nation and save the lives of your neighbors - let alone the glory, honor, or personal challenge messages.
This guy has already stated his fantasies to be bad. To claim that it is the same as slaying the dragon is pure contradiction.
Reminder about maxwellhill https://archive.ph/ozRti. A reddit supermod that last involvement with the site was just before a certain high profile figure also named Maxwell was caught.
This story is a good reminder that where there is smoke, there is fire. Normal, well-adjusted, non-medicated, and sane individuals do not up and decide to be gay, trans, or pedo. These "decisions" are always the result of serious trauma during youth. I would define trauma here as physical or sexual abuse and/or severely dysfunctional household dynamics.
So when we see a person like this Ashton Davis, it is a safe bet that they are not right in the head. I don't say that mockingly. Quite the opposite. I have tremendous sympathy for victims of abuse, especially children. Sadly, we live in a time where victims are encouraged to act out in life-ruining ways, rather than getting them the support and therapy they desperately need.
So never assume that the trans person is normal and sane, but just wants to change their gender (which is not possible). We are just seeing the outward effects of their damaged psyche. Further, you need never be surprised when horrible things about these people come to light. All the clues were there from the outset.
One of the saddest examples of this is Nancy Verhelst in Belgium. Her parents were misogynists who emotionally abused her because they wanted another son. Doctors evidently agreed with her parents, because instead of helping her come to grips with being the child of assholes, they enabled her transition to becoming a man. This predictably only made things worse and she became suicidal, and the doctors again agreed and had her put down.
I had never heard of her. Just read about her and it is a terrible story all around. Sadly, we cannot pick our parents. Further proof that if we don't identify the root cause of our issues, we have no hope of ever overcoming them. Anyone that tells you hacking off body parts will sort out your mental issues is as sick as you are.
Trannies are not normal and sane by definition. Gender Dysphoria is a straight mental illness and was only removed from the list by political pressure, instead of scientific revelation.
Whilst I don't care about fiction and fantasy, it is rather delightful to see yet another of our supposed moral superiors wishes he could rape kids without getting in trouble.
Graham Linehan, aka "Glinner" on Twatter et cetera, is an Irish TV writer, best known for Father Ted, Black Books, and The IT Crowd. He went totally woke and anti-GG for a long time there, and then the church of wokeness turned on him because he didn't exhibit the right views on something-or-other (I think it might have been for the heresy of not believing in the "feminine penis" or other such similar trans dogma that completely goes against biology and science as a whole).
After he got taken to the woodshed by the people he thought were his allies he went silent for a while, and has poked his head back up on occasion to make comments that tread right on the edge of him having some self-awareness and awareness about wokeness in general. Unfortunately, he almost always slips back into the inky blackness of the SJW side of things without realizing what he's actually saying agrees with reality and rationality, overall.
Welcome to Pedostan, hostile suburb/capital of Kukistan.
For the love of god, why is the UK government so intent on protecting, promoting, and just full-on embracing this nasty shit? What the fuck is wrong with these god damn people in charge?
And loli doesn't involve the idea of kids? Only the appearance? Which isn't an idea? If anything ideas are more well defended by the first amendment than images. You're going to need an x-ray laser to split hair this fine. If the argument is sound in regards to loli it is sound in regards to our mentally disturbed friend here as well.
It's not even about defending kids against rapists, it's more about the base assumption, that those who like said thing may be somewhat deviant. I don't think people who view such things are going to rape a child, but there's a scale of deviancy, and they exist on it somewhere.
I am, um, normal. I don't know if "loli" means - fantasy, art, or rape.
Nabokov's novel was about rape. I agree with age of consent being 18. (Heck, I wouldn't mind raising it to 35 - and voting age as well; then we'd have a chance of winning again.)
But in the 21st century, we'll soon have sex robots and virtual reality that are better than the real thing - for whatever genre anyone wishes. Hopefully this would make actual rape obsolete. But those fantasies should be protected under the Freedom of Thought and Speech.
It is a shortened term for the Japanese word “lolita” which means an underage girl who has not yet reached the age of sexual consent. Origin of Loli. The term originated in anime. These are typically young females drawn with baby-like big eyes, a chubby face and a small build.
Whoever wrote that is wrong. Loli is short for Lolita, but Lolita definitely comes from the extremely famous 1955 Nabokov book.
The term "Lolita" is used to define a young girl as "precociously seductive." It is derived from Vladimir Nabokov's 1955 novel Lolita, which depicts the narrator's sexual obsession with and victimization of a 12-year-old girl named Dolores, for whom his nickname is Lolita.
There is nothing sound about it. Most who kill in games have no desire to kill in the real world. Sexual desire is a preference, and sexual preferences for the most part don't change, so if you seek to satisfy your sexual desire via loli porn, then you are at least somewhat questionable. There was a guy using lib tier arguments on the other threads, stating: "anyone who is against loli is a pedo; an argument not too dissimilar to: "if you argue against racism claims you're a racist". The same poster went on to state he had a preference for petite flat chested women. If you see nothing suspect in that then you're hopeless.
Honestly, I think focusing on that part is duplicitous of Graham, because almost everybody is focused on the trannies' father being convicted of actual torture and rape of a child than some stories, then getting a job with him after.
Everything else is just fluff to show that this person isn't exactly in a place to cast judgement on others.
Thought crime?
Like how his dad raped a 10-year-old he kept chained in their basement, but while "Aimee" knew, he employed said rapist dad in his political campaign and got a guy kicked from the Green Party for uncovering this.
Thought crime.
This guy just happens to always end up around pedophiles that even keeps around. Isn't it sus?
Not using violence against mere thought-crimes is not same thing as "accepting".
Having a rational justice system that doesn't lynch people for mental illness is necessary not just to "defeat communism" but for any kind of advanced civilization.
Math question: how much helicopter fuel to service 100,000,000+ commies?
(Despite cheating in the swing states, it's clear that close to 80 million voted commie in 2020. I'd say at least 20 million more would have voted commie if someone gave them free chicken wings and beer for their efforts. Tens of millions more are about to be imported and legalized.)
History has shown that you only need to remove the agitators to return people to their natural state. Without the most vocal, the false consensus is removed and the herd migrates back to the center.
History has shown that you only need to remove the agitators to return people to their natural state. Without the most vocal, the false consensus is removed and the herd migrates back to the center.
Yes, that's what the left is trying to do to us.
And they have the military (along with the Presidency, House, Senate, Popular Vote, 99% of the media, academia, etc).
So, if you just give them an excuse by advocating violence, we'll be the ones getting "removed".
I have heard about this freak on a certain Australian bird enthusiast forum.
When both his husband is a pedo and also is his dad... isn't it reasonable suspicion that out Aimee is probably not a saint?
Damn, this guy has a Wiki article. And it even talks about his relations to and constant white-knighting for pedos!
As much as now people argue about loli here, I don't think someone like this should represent anyone and form the laws. I'm sorry, but "oh, my husband just likes to FANTASIZE about children having sex" rings even worse when you know his dad DID rape an actual child. Like at this point he should be careful about these things.
Eeeespecially if he is trying to have a political career.
You can't choose your dad. You can choose to stop supporting him if he does something so fucked. You can also choose not to marry another person with the same messed up fetish.
Good Lord, was that the best photo they could get? He looks so greasy.
they all do
So the guy on the left is trans? Not surprising since that is most of reddit but lets face it even as a dude he would be ugly.
Would be? He is 100% a dude. Doesn't even try. I used to date a dude who had longer hair than that and he didn't claim to be a woman (but was much better looking). That's all of Aimee's effort. Growing hair.
Hah, first place I went once I managed to find the name. I was not surprised there's a thread.
There always is. Always.
Troons get threads, always. The thread tends to be big when they're a giant activist retard like this... thing is.
Yep. I'd have serious questions.
Drag Queen story hour is old news.
True progressives are for pedophile story hour.
Freaking shit we need a a world war.
They're the same thing.
A separate point to note - that's the husband of the reddit mod. The reddit mod's father was sentenced to 22 years imprisonment for the rape and torture of children.
Freud would be proud.
The child pretending to slay a dragon isn't jerking off while doing so. That's the main difference.
In the mind of a child (and possibly many adults), the act of slaying a dragon is a sort of ultimate good. Dragons cause only strife and harm, by legend. To slay a dragon is to do a great service to your nation and save the lives of your neighbors - let alone the glory, honor, or personal challenge messages.
This guy has already stated his fantasies to be bad. To claim that it is the same as slaying the dragon is pure contradiction.
It's the kind of act that gets attributed to literal saints, like Saint George, the patron saint of England.
Just read it. There's a lot. But damn. Gotta cover this shit up because apparently noticing things is still verboten on reddit
Reminder about maxwellhill https://archive.ph/ozRti. A reddit supermod that last involvement with the site was just before a certain high profile figure also named Maxwell was caught.
This story is a good reminder that where there is smoke, there is fire. Normal, well-adjusted, non-medicated, and sane individuals do not up and decide to be gay, trans, or pedo. These "decisions" are always the result of serious trauma during youth. I would define trauma here as physical or sexual abuse and/or severely dysfunctional household dynamics.
So when we see a person like this Ashton Davis, it is a safe bet that they are not right in the head. I don't say that mockingly. Quite the opposite. I have tremendous sympathy for victims of abuse, especially children. Sadly, we live in a time where victims are encouraged to act out in life-ruining ways, rather than getting them the support and therapy they desperately need.
So never assume that the trans person is normal and sane, but just wants to change their gender (which is not possible). We are just seeing the outward effects of their damaged psyche. Further, you need never be surprised when horrible things about these people come to light. All the clues were there from the outset.
One of the saddest examples of this is Nancy Verhelst in Belgium. Her parents were misogynists who emotionally abused her because they wanted another son. Doctors evidently agreed with her parents, because instead of helping her come to grips with being the child of assholes, they enabled her transition to becoming a man. This predictably only made things worse and she became suicidal, and the doctors again agreed and had her put down.
I had never heard of her. Just read about her and it is a terrible story all around. Sadly, we cannot pick our parents. Further proof that if we don't identify the root cause of our issues, we have no hope of ever overcoming them. Anyone that tells you hacking off body parts will sort out your mental issues is as sick as you are.
Trannies are not normal and sane by definition. Gender Dysphoria is a straight mental illness and was only removed from the list by political pressure, instead of scientific revelation.
Whilst I don't care about fiction and fantasy, it is rather delightful to see yet another of our supposed moral superiors wishes he could rape kids without getting in trouble.
I'm quite enjoying the threads on this topic: https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/mbbb56/aimee_challenor_and_the_danger_of_transgender/
All deleted. Nice.
I SEE BLOOD.
https://www.reveddit.com/v/europe/comments/mbbb56/aimee_challenor_and_the_danger_of_transgender/?add_user=Greekball..c.new..t1_grwq7gp.&
degenerates like this belong on a cross.
The goal, People, is one thing: Any age of consent. Love is love. Push back! This is wrong. We have to call it out.
Wait, wait - is that Glinner getting dangerously close to being redpilled?
Naaaah, nevermind, his head is so far up his own ass he'll never achieve any sort of enlightenment.
Who is Glinner anyway?
Graham Linehan, aka "Glinner" on Twatter et cetera, is an Irish TV writer, best known for Father Ted, Black Books, and The IT Crowd. He went totally woke and anti-GG for a long time there, and then the church of wokeness turned on him because he didn't exhibit the right views on something-or-other (I think it might have been for the heresy of not believing in the "feminine penis" or other such similar trans dogma that completely goes against biology and science as a whole).
After he got taken to the woodshed by the people he thought were his allies he went silent for a while, and has poked his head back up on occasion to make comments that tread right on the edge of him having some self-awareness and awareness about wokeness in general. Unfortunately, he almost always slips back into the inky blackness of the SJW side of things without realizing what he's actually saying agrees with reality and rationality, overall.
Welcome to Pedostan, hostile suburb/capital of Kukistan.
For the love of god, why is the UK government so intent on protecting, promoting, and just full-on embracing this nasty shit? What the fuck is wrong with these god damn people in charge?
I've just realised that these people live in UK.
Under UK law, loli art is literally CP. The husband could be jailed over this.
delete this now reddit.
They tried to lol
Sex stories involving kids? If the pro loli crowd are being consistent, they'll continue their: "this is just like killing hookers in GTA" argument.
Involving the idea of kids.
Because that argument is indeed sound.
And loli doesn't involve the idea of kids? Only the appearance? Which isn't an idea? If anything ideas are more well defended by the first amendment than images. You're going to need an x-ray laser to split hair this fine. If the argument is sound in regards to loli it is sound in regards to our mentally disturbed friend here as well.
Not really. (And with modern technology we've split things millions of times thinner than hair.)
Someone killing you violates your Rights. Someone fantasizing about killing you does not.
Someone robbing a bank violates Property Rights of the bank owners. Someone fantasizing about robbing a bank does not.
Etc.
We all want to virtue signal about how much we want to defend children from rapists, but our legal philosophy has to be logically consistent.
It's not even about defending kids against rapists, it's more about the base assumption, that those who like said thing may be somewhat deviant. I don't think people who view such things are going to rape a child, but there's a scale of deviancy, and they exist on it somewhere.
I may have misunderstood your prior post. I thought you were saying this situation was different from loli rather than the same.
I am, um, normal. I don't know if "loli" means - fantasy, art, or rape.
Nabokov's novel was about rape. I agree with age of consent being 18. (Heck, I wouldn't mind raising it to 35 - and voting age as well; then we'd have a chance of winning again.)
But in the 21st century, we'll soon have sex robots and virtual reality that are better than the real thing - for whatever genre anyone wishes. Hopefully this would make actual rape obsolete. But those fantasies should be protected under the Freedom of Thought and Speech.
Whoever wrote that is wrong. Loli is short for Lolita, but Lolita definitely comes from the extremely famous 1955 Nabokov book.
There is nothing sound about it. Most who kill in games have no desire to kill in the real world. Sexual desire is a preference, and sexual preferences for the most part don't change, so if you seek to satisfy your sexual desire via loli porn, then you are at least somewhat questionable. There was a guy using lib tier arguments on the other threads, stating: "anyone who is against loli is a pedo; an argument not too dissimilar to: "if you argue against racism claims you're a racist". The same poster went on to state he had a preference for petite flat chested women. If you see nothing suspect in that then you're hopeless.
What point are you all even trying to make here? Are people into loli pedohiles? Should it be illegal to draw child porn? What?
Comment Removed: Rule 2
Well I'll just say this :
That's all
Honestly, I think focusing on that part is duplicitous of Graham, because almost everybody is focused on the trannies' father being convicted of actual torture and rape of a child than some stories, then getting a job with him after.
Everything else is just fluff to show that this person isn't exactly in a place to cast judgement on others.
I look forward to the answers to this question that will never be posted.
lol downvotes aren't answers.
This is Reddit teir crap. Downvotes and shit arguments
I hate Reddit, but has anything other than thought-crime been committed?
We shouldn't punish people for thought-crime.
Thought crime?
Like how his dad raped a 10-year-old he kept chained in their basement, but while "Aimee" knew, he employed said rapist dad in his political campaign and got a guy kicked from the Green Party for uncovering this.
Thought crime.
This guy just happens to always end up around pedophiles that even keeps around. Isn't it sus?
I don't know, that's why I asked. If there's actual physical rape then prosecute.
Another thing that is fucked is how this one is active in the underage trans community on Reddit, moderating a teen trans sub before this and all.
He is also involved in diaper/adult baby fetish circles.
Just too many sexualised things about children in his life, especially knowing he is also interested in mentoring underage people.
Plus his husband is a self-admitted pedophile. And, the dad, Aimee, the husband and their gay lover friend are all active in the furry community.
I researched this; the dad was jailed for 22 years. While the investigation was ongoing, he was working in politics for his tranny son.
Some thoughts must not be tolerated.
Then you are giving the communists (who are now in solid majority) unlimited power to oppress everyone...
A communist majority doesn't care about precedent. It oppresses everyone because being the majority gives it the power to do so.
Re-reading this, you're making the claim that accepting pedophilia is necessary to defeat communism.
You're asking for a seat in the cargo section with that line of thinking.
Not using violence against mere thought-crimes is not same thing as "accepting".
Having a rational justice system that doesn't lynch people for mental illness is necessary not just to "defeat communism" but for any kind of advanced civilization.
Communists get helicopter rides, problem solved.
Math question: how much helicopter fuel to service 100,000,000+ commies?
(Despite cheating in the swing states, it's clear that close to 80 million voted commie in 2020. I'd say at least 20 million more would have voted commie if someone gave them free chicken wings and beer for their efforts. Tens of millions more are about to be imported and legalized.)
History has shown that you only need to remove the agitators to return people to their natural state. Without the most vocal, the false consensus is removed and the herd migrates back to the center.
Yes, that's what the left is trying to do to us.
And they have the military (along with the Presidency, House, Senate, Popular Vote, 99% of the media, academia, etc).
So, if you just give them an excuse by advocating violence, we'll be the ones getting "removed".