I already knew the Supreme Court was utterly compromised when they refused the Texas election case on lack of standing so I expected nothing. I am still disgusted by this.
Amy Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh have betrayed Trump once again.
A SJW white woman who adopts kids from Africa like Amy Barrett should have never been picked to be a Supreme Court Justice in the first place. She belongs sitting in her overpriced home drinking shitty boxed wine and virtue signalling on social media, not on the bench at the purported highest court in the land.
Looking at him now, it is clear that Kavanaugh morally deserved to be utterly destroyed professionally by the Democrats' false accusations. I am disgusted by what a complete snivelling cuck he has been. The fucker hired all female clerks after getting railroaded with false allegations in order to virtue signal. Pathetic excuse of a "man".
Trump getting to appoint three "conservative" justices has been an utter waste.
Fuck the Federalist Society who vetted these picks.
Its not like Trump has been a politician his whole life to know who to pick. He probably got suggested his picks from people who he trusted, and we know the long list of how many people he trusted turned out to be snakes.
I had hope for his picks too, but in retrospect Trump was in way too over his head to make perfect decisions because he was surrounded on all sides by confederates.
It's plain as day that the law schools pump out these complete shitstains. I'd rather have a plumber on the Supreme Court (note: this is entirely possible, there's no legal requirement for a law degree or other credential to serve. Tho obviously the senate must confirm them.)
I agree. He should have realized early on that he couldn't trust any of them, and many only came to his side to be a leech on his belly before throwing him to the wolves.
But, I can see how the mistake could be made. No one wants to believe literally everyone around them is untrustable snakes, and will eventually get just comfortable enough to fail.
In reality, any voter (or elected representative of voters) in a state affected by fraud has standing, due to having their votes overidden by fraudulent ones they are injured parties or the representatives thereof... but getting a judge to admit that is like pulling teeth.
I thought I liked Barrett and still not necessarily sure I would disagree with her on application of law. Should have realized she's a woman and therefore a pussy though. I'm sure she's too afraid to look bad or not fit in or something other irrational emotional BS they are so much more susceptible to.
Not really surprised. At one point I thought the Supreme Court would be the capacitor of the system, slowing down, but not stopping the globalist revolution. Now I'm just convinced Trump's last two picks were a total waste of time.
Irony since Roberts said his era of the court was to avoid any "Dread Scott" decisions...and in doing so is going to cause the very thing he thought he was preventing.
Am I the only one that wonders what the fuck happens? These cases get thrown out on completely different grounds.
I mean, I live in a country that had some shenanigans going on a major election a few years ago. Our supreme court looked at the facts (x votes difference and x votes + y are contested, and we are talking about minor things like opening the ballots to early, even with everyone present) and decided that we had to do this shit again. Because public trust in the voting-process is fucking important in a democracy.
The funny thing is: There's still people, to this day, that argue it wasn't necessary, because statistical data suggests these single erreounus things wouldn't have changed the outcome. And yeah, the winner of the first round won overall. But that wasn't what it was about. It was about letting the voting public know that their vote is counted. And not estimated in a fucking math-masturbation.
Fact is: When you decide to let the sovereign have a say, don't fucking overrule them with laws or legal nitpicking.
Democrat have completely discarded one of the most important principles of public service: the appearance of impropriety is impropriety. If a plurality of people doubt the integrity of the system, that is reason enough to audit the system. Instead, we've now got this retardedly high standard of evidence - one that seemingly cannot be reached even with video documentation - in order to investigate the powers that be.
Meanwhile, private citizens are destroyed by random unproven allegations on social media; where the standards of evidence should be highest, they are now non-existent.
I'm actually fine with SCOTUS repeatedly refusing to hear any cases.
SCOTUS has repeatedly caused tyranny and blood letting at almost every chance it was given. It's better that the court refuse to hear cases, then to rule on a case by declaring the first, second, third, forth, and fifth amendments not incorporated to the states.
If you wanted to see the 75 million Americans be declared enemy combatants worthy of absolutely no legal protection, the only body in the land that could do it is the US Supreme Court.
It sucks, but I promise you that you're better off.
Let me remind you how retarded SCOTUS is:
The Supreme Court has:
Instantiated Racialism using an Equality argument in the form of Segregation
Used "science" to create the Tri-mester system for abortions which is effectively junk science at this point
Created Gun Control by making a proto-fascist argument about how the people were the state and the state were the people, so laws that regulated the arming of the people (and what defined who the people were), could never be unconstitutional.
Using that same proto-fascist argument claimed that the 1st, 2nd, 14th, and 15th amendments didn't apply to the states because the Bill of Rights only existed to limit the federal government from interfering with your federal rights, but the state was the embodiment of the people, so therefore the state couldn't trample your rights.
Despite the the ambush and massacre of US Federal Infantry that caused an effective coup in the government of Mississippi, declared that the president had no right to send US troops to aid against this coup & massacre
Simply nullified the citizenship of all blacks in the US (including those that owned property, were state citizens, had been recognized as US citizens, and were even political representatives within their states) based on a racialist assertion by the Chief Justice that was rationalized by his own intentional misinterpretation of English Common Law, even while England was in the middle of it's own Abolitionist movement and explicitly gave rights to Commonwealth peoples.
Gave itself the ability to nullify any law passed by congress, and signed by the president, with the only 'check' on this power coming in the form of a constitutional Amendment which would require at least a 2/3rds approval from congress, a signature from the president, and 3/5ths of the states... because that's "balanced".
Despite later ranting about state's rights not to apply the Bill of Rights to the states, the similar court also happened to validate the Fugitive Slave Law, which allowed one state to effectively invade another with PMC's, arrest it's citizens for having previously been classified as slaves without due process, extradition, or even simple notification; and allowed those PMC's to forcibly deputize the free state's citizens against their own will in order to acquire supplies and even participate in the arrest. This insane federal over-reach of authority was pursued under the direction of the President, and would effectively be the underlying cause the Civil War.
Similarly, this same fucking court attempted to validate secession rather than admit that the Fugitive Slave Law was wildly unconstitutional, and was the primary cause of the Civil War.
Declared that calling someone "Yellow" was not protected 1st Amendment Speech, and was in fact "incitement" that justified a violent response through "fighting words". Yes, that's really where Fighting Words doctrine originates. A drunken asshole shot another man for calling him "yellow" and SCOTUS was like "Well you shouldn't have called him yella!" This scene is actually more realistic than you realize.
Affirmed the right for the President of the United States, by executive fiat, to indiscriminately arrest and imprison tens of thousands of American citizens based on their race alone. This decision has never been overturned. The fact that those imprisoned people had their property seized by the States of California, Oregon, and Washington was also affirmed.
Affirmed the criminalization and mandatory seizure of all gold and silver coins/bullion of any kind in the US if you were not entered into a government registry for coin collectors (again by executive fiat). Any attempts to buy, trade, or sell unregistered gold/silver coins/bullion was punishable to the tune of thousands of dollars and up to 10 years in a federal prison. It was affirmed several times until Gerald Ford rescinded the executive order in 1973.
Has affirmed the right of the US Government to declare individuals "enemy combatants" and have them indefinitely detained, denied legal counsel, and assassinated, all with effectively no significant transparency or scrutiny outside of a shadow-court system.
Has not really ever attempted to respect the 10th Amendment or the Interstate Commerce Clause in over 100 years.
The level of unfathomable madness that SCOTUS is capable of is terrifying. I'm not really surprised that 4 Justices found the idea of criminalizing church services by government fiat to be constitutional.
Civil Disobedience to these orders is the only real way to preserve the constitution. It is our "constitution" as Americans to defend. The judiciary will unequivocally refuse to defend it.
Constitution: the physical makeup of the individual especially with respect to the health, strength, and appearance of the body. The American Constitution is not a document, it is who we are, and no court shall ever have a say against it.
I like how we have a system that's set up outlining the abilities of government, yet one branch of government just said "nah, we need more." What a fucking joke.
You know how you weaken the court? Pardon people so prosecutions don't happen (nothing gets to the court), and reduce laws so the court doesn't have the legal justification to decide.
After that, pass a constitutional amendment and repeal Marbury v. Madison.
Or just go full-on "Justice Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it", totally ignore all Court rulings you don't like, and make Congress impeach/remove you from office for doing so.
"The government says that the government didn't find any proof of government wrongdoing," has been happening for years and will continue to happen because people have so much trust in the goverment.
I already knew the Supreme Court was utterly compromised when they refused the Texas election case on lack of standing so I expected nothing. I am still disgusted by this.
Amy Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh have betrayed Trump once again.
A SJW white woman who adopts kids from Africa like Amy Barrett should have never been picked to be a Supreme Court Justice in the first place. She belongs sitting in her overpriced home drinking shitty boxed wine and virtue signalling on social media, not on the bench at the purported highest court in the land.
Looking at him now, it is clear that Kavanaugh morally deserved to be utterly destroyed professionally by the Democrats' false accusations. I am disgusted by what a complete snivelling cuck he has been. The fucker hired all female clerks after getting railroaded with false allegations in order to virtue signal. Pathetic excuse of a "man".
Trump getting to appoint three "conservative" justices has been an utter waste.
Fuck the Federalist Society who vetted these picks.
Barrett and Kavanaugh betrayed all of us. This isn't about politics at this point, it's about the republic itself.
Its not like Trump has been a politician his whole life to know who to pick. He probably got suggested his picks from people who he trusted, and we know the long list of how many people he trusted turned out to be snakes.
I had hope for his picks too, but in retrospect Trump was in way too over his head to make perfect decisions because he was surrounded on all sides by confederates.
He was an idiot to trust any elected Republican.
It's plain as day that the law schools pump out these complete shitstains. I'd rather have a plumber on the Supreme Court (note: this is entirely possible, there's no legal requirement for a law degree or other credential to serve. Tho obviously the senate must confirm them.)
I agree. He should have realized early on that he couldn't trust any of them, and many only came to his side to be a leech on his belly before throwing him to the wolves.
But, I can see how the mistake could be made. No one wants to believe literally everyone around them is untrustable snakes, and will eventually get just comfortable enough to fail.
If Trump actually nominated an outsider, there is no way the senate would have confirmed.
The system has been broken long before we got here, by people who have long since been dead.
Oh by the way they also signed off on the release of Trump's tax returns.
The evil empire closes ranks.
I will just say this.
Biden does not even need to pack the court, they already do the globalists' bidding.
It will make no real difference if he does pack the court eventually.
Anyone here who still thinks the Supreme Court will be a check on incoming radical leftist policies is merely deluding themselves.
What a sick joke.
How the court works now:
Roberts: "If we do/don't do x, there will be wiots!"
I wonder what message this conveys to the heavily armed right-wing ?
Riddle me this: who DOES have standing to bring these cases?
These procedural tap-outs are disgusting.
Schrodinger's standing basically.
Standing is a legal fiction cowardly judges pulled from their rectum to avoid making difficult decisions.
In reality, any voter (or elected representative of voters) in a state affected by fraud has standing, due to having their votes overidden by fraudulent ones they are injured parties or the representatives thereof... but getting a judge to admit that is like pulling teeth.
Clown. World.
I thought I liked Barrett and still not necessarily sure I would disagree with her on application of law. Should have realized she's a woman and therefore a pussy though. I'm sure she's too afraid to look bad or not fit in or something other irrational emotional BS they are so much more susceptible to.
Not really surprised. At one point I thought the Supreme Court would be the capacitor of the system, slowing down, but not stopping the globalist revolution. Now I'm just convinced Trump's last two picks were a total waste of time.
Don't know what else anybody expected
They've got their foot on the gas at this point, just hurtling us towards civil war, is joe really worth fighting this hard for leftists?
Irony since Roberts said his era of the court was to avoid any "Dread Scott" decisions...and in doing so is going to cause the very thing he thought he was preventing.
Am I the only one that wonders what the fuck happens? These cases get thrown out on completely different grounds.
I mean, I live in a country that had some shenanigans going on a major election a few years ago. Our supreme court looked at the facts (x votes difference and x votes + y are contested, and we are talking about minor things like opening the ballots to early, even with everyone present) and decided that we had to do this shit again. Because public trust in the voting-process is fucking important in a democracy.
The funny thing is: There's still people, to this day, that argue it wasn't necessary, because statistical data suggests these single erreounus things wouldn't have changed the outcome. And yeah, the winner of the first round won overall. But that wasn't what it was about. It was about letting the voting public know that their vote is counted. And not estimated in a fucking math-masturbation.
Fact is: When you decide to let the sovereign have a say, don't fucking overrule them with laws or legal nitpicking.
Democrat have completely discarded one of the most important principles of public service: the appearance of impropriety is impropriety. If a plurality of people doubt the integrity of the system, that is reason enough to audit the system. Instead, we've now got this retardedly high standard of evidence - one that seemingly cannot be reached even with video documentation - in order to investigate the powers that be.
Meanwhile, private citizens are destroyed by random unproven allegations on social media; where the standards of evidence should be highest, they are now non-existent.
So you can legally illegally change the rules for an election now then according to SCOTUS then.
I'm sorry for backing Kavanaugh. I really thought their opposition to him meant he was our savior, but they were reverse psychologying us.
I'm actually fine with SCOTUS repeatedly refusing to hear any cases.
SCOTUS has repeatedly caused tyranny and blood letting at almost every chance it was given. It's better that the court refuse to hear cases, then to rule on a case by declaring the first, second, third, forth, and fifth amendments not incorporated to the states.
If you wanted to see the 75 million Americans be declared enemy combatants worthy of absolutely no legal protection, the only body in the land that could do it is the US Supreme Court.
It sucks, but I promise you that you're better off.
Let me remind you how retarded SCOTUS is:
The Supreme Court has:
Instantiated Racialism using an Equality argument in the form of Segregation
Used "science" to create the Tri-mester system for abortions which is effectively junk science at this point
Created Gun Control by making a proto-fascist argument about how the people were the state and the state were the people, so laws that regulated the arming of the people (and what defined who the people were), could never be unconstitutional.
Using that same proto-fascist argument claimed that the 1st, 2nd, 14th, and 15th amendments didn't apply to the states because the Bill of Rights only existed to limit the federal government from interfering with your federal rights, but the state was the embodiment of the people, so therefore the state couldn't trample your rights.
Despite the the ambush and massacre of US Federal Infantry that caused an effective coup in the government of Mississippi, declared that the president had no right to send US troops to aid against this coup & massacre
Simply nullified the citizenship of all blacks in the US (including those that owned property, were state citizens, had been recognized as US citizens, and were even political representatives within their states) based on a racialist assertion by the Chief Justice that was rationalized by his own intentional misinterpretation of English Common Law, even while England was in the middle of it's own Abolitionist movement and explicitly gave rights to Commonwealth peoples.
Gave itself the ability to nullify any law passed by congress, and signed by the president, with the only 'check' on this power coming in the form of a constitutional Amendment which would require at least a 2/3rds approval from congress, a signature from the president, and 3/5ths of the states... because that's "balanced".
Despite later ranting about state's rights not to apply the Bill of Rights to the states, the similar court also happened to validate the Fugitive Slave Law, which allowed one state to effectively invade another with PMC's, arrest it's citizens for having previously been classified as slaves without due process, extradition, or even simple notification; and allowed those PMC's to forcibly deputize the free state's citizens against their own will in order to acquire supplies and even participate in the arrest. This insane federal over-reach of authority was pursued under the direction of the President, and would effectively be the underlying cause the Civil War.
Similarly, this same fucking court attempted to validate secession rather than admit that the Fugitive Slave Law was wildly unconstitutional, and was the primary cause of the Civil War.
Declared that calling someone "Yellow" was not protected 1st Amendment Speech, and was in fact "incitement" that justified a violent response through "fighting words". Yes, that's really where Fighting Words doctrine originates. A drunken asshole shot another man for calling him "yellow" and SCOTUS was like "Well you shouldn't have called him yella!" This scene is actually more realistic than you realize.
Affirmed the right for the President of the United States, by executive fiat, to indiscriminately arrest and imprison tens of thousands of American citizens based on their race alone. This decision has never been overturned. The fact that those imprisoned people had their property seized by the States of California, Oregon, and Washington was also affirmed.
Affirmed the criminalization and mandatory seizure of all gold and silver coins/bullion of any kind in the US if you were not entered into a government registry for coin collectors (again by executive fiat). Any attempts to buy, trade, or sell unregistered gold/silver coins/bullion was punishable to the tune of thousands of dollars and up to 10 years in a federal prison. It was affirmed several times until Gerald Ford rescinded the executive order in 1973.
Has affirmed the right of the US Government to declare individuals "enemy combatants" and have them indefinitely detained, denied legal counsel, and assassinated, all with effectively no significant transparency or scrutiny outside of a shadow-court system.
Has not really ever attempted to respect the 10th Amendment or the Interstate Commerce Clause in over 100 years.
The level of unfathomable madness that SCOTUS is capable of is terrifying. I'm not really surprised that 4 Justices found the idea of criminalizing church services by government fiat to be constitutional.
Civil Disobedience to these orders is the only real way to preserve the constitution. It is our "constitution" as Americans to defend. The judiciary will unequivocally refuse to defend it.
Constitution: the physical makeup of the individual especially with respect to the health, strength, and appearance of the body. The American Constitution is not a document, it is who we are, and no court shall ever have a say against it.
I like how we have a system that's set up outlining the abilities of government, yet one branch of government just said "nah, we need more." What a fucking joke.
You know how you weaken the court? Pardon people so prosecutions don't happen (nothing gets to the court), and reduce laws so the court doesn't have the legal justification to decide.
After that, pass a constitutional amendment and repeal Marbury v. Madison.
Or just go full-on "Justice Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it", totally ignore all Court rulings you don't like, and make Congress impeach/remove you from office for doing so.
Alito and Thomas are the only ones left, rip.
"The government says that the government didn't find any proof of government wrongdoing," has been happening for years and will continue to happen because people have so much trust in the goverment.