I'm actually fine with SCOTUS repeatedly refusing to hear any cases.
SCOTUS has repeatedly caused tyranny and blood letting at almost every chance it was given. It's better that the court refuse to hear cases, then to rule on a case by declaring the first, second, third, forth, and fifth amendments not incorporated to the states.
If you wanted to see the 75 million Americans be declared enemy combatants worthy of absolutely no legal protection, the only body in the land that could do it is the US Supreme Court.
It sucks, but I promise you that you're better off.
Let me remind you how retarded SCOTUS is:
The Supreme Court has:
Instantiated Racialism using an Equality argument in the form of Segregation
Used "science" to create the Tri-mester system for abortions which is effectively junk science at this point
Created Gun Control by making a proto-fascist argument about how the people were the state and the state were the people, so laws that regulated the arming of the people (and what defined who the people were), could never be unconstitutional.
Using that same proto-fascist argument claimed that the 1st, 2nd, 14th, and 15th amendments didn't apply to the states because the Bill of Rights only existed to limit the federal government from interfering with your federal rights, but the state was the embodiment of the people, so therefore the state couldn't trample your rights.
Despite the the ambush and massacre of US Federal Infantry that caused an effective coup in the government of Mississippi, declared that the president had no right to send US troops to aid against this coup & massacre
Simply nullified the citizenship of all blacks in the US (including those that owned property, were state citizens, had been recognized as US citizens, and were even political representatives within their states) based on a racialist assertion by the Chief Justice that was rationalized by his own intentional misinterpretation of English Common Law, even while England was in the middle of it's own Abolitionist movement and explicitly gave rights to Commonwealth peoples.
Gave itself the ability to nullify any law passed by congress, and signed by the president, with the only 'check' on this power coming in the form of a constitutional Amendment which would require at least a 2/3rds approval from congress, a signature from the president, and 3/5ths of the states... because that's "balanced".
Despite later ranting about state's rights not to apply the Bill of Rights to the states, the similar court also happened to validate the Fugitive Slave Law, which allowed one state to effectively invade another with PMC's, arrest it's citizens for having previously been classified as slaves without due process, extradition, or even simple notification; and allowed those PMC's to forcibly deputize the free state's citizens against their own will in order to acquire supplies and even participate in the arrest. This insane federal over-reach of authority was pursued under the direction of the President, and would effectively be the underlying cause the Civil War.
Similarly, this same fucking court attempted to validate secession rather than admit that the Fugitive Slave Law was wildly unconstitutional, and was the primary cause of the Civil War.
Declared that calling someone "Yellow" was not protected 1st Amendment Speech, and was in fact "incitement" that justified a violent response through "fighting words". Yes, that's really where Fighting Words doctrine originates. A drunken asshole shot another man for calling him "yellow" and SCOTUS was like "Well you shouldn't have called him yella!" This scene is actually more realistic than you realize.
Affirmed the right for the President of the United States, by executive fiat, to indiscriminately arrest and imprison tens of thousands of American citizens based on their race alone. This decision has never been overturned. The fact that those imprisoned people had their property seized by the States of California, Oregon, and Washington was also affirmed.
Affirmed the criminalization and mandatory seizure of all gold and silver coins/bullion of any kind in the US if you were not entered into a government registry for coin collectors (again by executive fiat). Any attempts to buy, trade, or sell unregistered gold/silver coins/bullion was punishable to the tune of thousands of dollars and up to 10 years in a federal prison. It was affirmed several times until Gerald Ford rescinded the executive order in 1973.
Has affirmed the right of the US Government to declare individuals "enemy combatants" and have them indefinitely detained, denied legal counsel, and assassinated, all with effectively no significant transparency or scrutiny outside of a shadow-court system.
Has not really ever attempted to respect the 10th Amendment or the Interstate Commerce Clause in over 100 years.
The level of unfathomable madness that SCOTUS is capable of is terrifying. I'm not really surprised that 4 Justices found the idea of criminalizing church services by government fiat to be constitutional.
Civil Disobedience to these orders is the only real way to preserve the constitution. It is our "constitution" as Americans to defend. The judiciary will unequivocally refuse to defend it.
Constitution: the physical makeup of the individual especially with respect to the health, strength, and appearance of the body. The American Constitution is not a document, it is who we are, and no court shall ever have a say against it.
I like how we have a system that's set up outlining the abilities of government, yet one branch of government just said "nah, we need more." What a fucking joke.
You know how you weaken the court? Pardon people so prosecutions don't happen (nothing gets to the court), and reduce laws so the court doesn't have the legal justification to decide.
After that, pass a constitutional amendment and repeal Marbury v. Madison.
Or just go full-on "Justice Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it", totally ignore all Court rulings you don't like, and make Congress impeach/remove you from office for doing so.
I'm actually fine with SCOTUS repeatedly refusing to hear any cases.
SCOTUS has repeatedly caused tyranny and blood letting at almost every chance it was given. It's better that the court refuse to hear cases, then to rule on a case by declaring the first, second, third, forth, and fifth amendments not incorporated to the states.
If you wanted to see the 75 million Americans be declared enemy combatants worthy of absolutely no legal protection, the only body in the land that could do it is the US Supreme Court.
It sucks, but I promise you that you're better off.
Let me remind you how retarded SCOTUS is:
The Supreme Court has:
Instantiated Racialism using an Equality argument in the form of Segregation
Used "science" to create the Tri-mester system for abortions which is effectively junk science at this point
Created Gun Control by making a proto-fascist argument about how the people were the state and the state were the people, so laws that regulated the arming of the people (and what defined who the people were), could never be unconstitutional.
Using that same proto-fascist argument claimed that the 1st, 2nd, 14th, and 15th amendments didn't apply to the states because the Bill of Rights only existed to limit the federal government from interfering with your federal rights, but the state was the embodiment of the people, so therefore the state couldn't trample your rights.
Despite the the ambush and massacre of US Federal Infantry that caused an effective coup in the government of Mississippi, declared that the president had no right to send US troops to aid against this coup & massacre
Simply nullified the citizenship of all blacks in the US (including those that owned property, were state citizens, had been recognized as US citizens, and were even political representatives within their states) based on a racialist assertion by the Chief Justice that was rationalized by his own intentional misinterpretation of English Common Law, even while England was in the middle of it's own Abolitionist movement and explicitly gave rights to Commonwealth peoples.
Gave itself the ability to nullify any law passed by congress, and signed by the president, with the only 'check' on this power coming in the form of a constitutional Amendment which would require at least a 2/3rds approval from congress, a signature from the president, and 3/5ths of the states... because that's "balanced".
Despite later ranting about state's rights not to apply the Bill of Rights to the states, the similar court also happened to validate the Fugitive Slave Law, which allowed one state to effectively invade another with PMC's, arrest it's citizens for having previously been classified as slaves without due process, extradition, or even simple notification; and allowed those PMC's to forcibly deputize the free state's citizens against their own will in order to acquire supplies and even participate in the arrest. This insane federal over-reach of authority was pursued under the direction of the President, and would effectively be the underlying cause the Civil War.
Similarly, this same fucking court attempted to validate secession rather than admit that the Fugitive Slave Law was wildly unconstitutional, and was the primary cause of the Civil War.
Declared that calling someone "Yellow" was not protected 1st Amendment Speech, and was in fact "incitement" that justified a violent response through "fighting words". Yes, that's really where Fighting Words doctrine originates. A drunken asshole shot another man for calling him "yellow" and SCOTUS was like "Well you shouldn't have called him yella!" This scene is actually more realistic than you realize.
Affirmed the right for the President of the United States, by executive fiat, to indiscriminately arrest and imprison tens of thousands of American citizens based on their race alone. This decision has never been overturned. The fact that those imprisoned people had their property seized by the States of California, Oregon, and Washington was also affirmed.
Affirmed the criminalization and mandatory seizure of all gold and silver coins/bullion of any kind in the US if you were not entered into a government registry for coin collectors (again by executive fiat). Any attempts to buy, trade, or sell unregistered gold/silver coins/bullion was punishable to the tune of thousands of dollars and up to 10 years in a federal prison. It was affirmed several times until Gerald Ford rescinded the executive order in 1973.
Has affirmed the right of the US Government to declare individuals "enemy combatants" and have them indefinitely detained, denied legal counsel, and assassinated, all with effectively no significant transparency or scrutiny outside of a shadow-court system.
Has not really ever attempted to respect the 10th Amendment or the Interstate Commerce Clause in over 100 years.
The level of unfathomable madness that SCOTUS is capable of is terrifying. I'm not really surprised that 4 Justices found the idea of criminalizing church services by government fiat to be constitutional.
Civil Disobedience to these orders is the only real way to preserve the constitution. It is our "constitution" as Americans to defend. The judiciary will unequivocally refuse to defend it.
Constitution: the physical makeup of the individual especially with respect to the health, strength, and appearance of the body. The American Constitution is not a document, it is who we are, and no court shall ever have a say against it.
I like how we have a system that's set up outlining the abilities of government, yet one branch of government just said "nah, we need more." What a fucking joke.
You know how you weaken the court? Pardon people so prosecutions don't happen (nothing gets to the court), and reduce laws so the court doesn't have the legal justification to decide.
After that, pass a constitutional amendment and repeal Marbury v. Madison.
Or just go full-on "Justice Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it", totally ignore all Court rulings you don't like, and make Congress impeach/remove you from office for doing so.