Am I the only one that wonders what the fuck happens? These cases get thrown out on completely different grounds.
I mean, I live in a country that had some shenanigans going on a major election a few years ago. Our supreme court looked at the facts (x votes difference and x votes + y are contested, and we are talking about minor things like opening the ballots to early, even with everyone present) and decided that we had to do this shit again. Because public trust in the voting-process is fucking important in a democracy.
The funny thing is: There's still people, to this day, that argue it wasn't necessary, because statistical data suggests these single erreounus things wouldn't have changed the outcome. And yeah, the winner of the first round won overall. But that wasn't what it was about. It was about letting the voting public know that their vote is counted. And not estimated in a fucking math-masturbation.
Fact is: When you decide to let the sovereign have a say, don't fucking overrule them with laws or legal nitpicking.
Democrat have completely discarded one of the most important principles of public service: the appearance of impropriety is impropriety. If a plurality of people doubt the integrity of the system, that is reason enough to audit the system. Instead, we've now got this retardedly high standard of evidence - one that seemingly cannot be reached even with video documentation - in order to investigate the powers that be.
Meanwhile, private citizens are destroyed by random unproven allegations on social media; where the standards of evidence should be highest, they are now non-existent.
Am I the only one that wonders what the fuck happens? These cases get thrown out on completely different grounds.
I mean, I live in a country that had some shenanigans going on a major election a few years ago. Our supreme court looked at the facts (x votes difference and x votes + y are contested, and we are talking about minor things like opening the ballots to early, even with everyone present) and decided that we had to do this shit again. Because public trust in the voting-process is fucking important in a democracy.
The funny thing is: There's still people, to this day, that argue it wasn't necessary, because statistical data suggests these single erreounus things wouldn't have changed the outcome. And yeah, the winner of the first round won overall. But that wasn't what it was about. It was about letting the voting public know that their vote is counted. And not estimated in a fucking math-masturbation.
Fact is: When you decide to let the sovereign have a say, don't fucking overrule them with laws or legal nitpicking.
Democrat have completely discarded one of the most important principles of public service: the appearance of impropriety is impropriety. If a plurality of people doubt the integrity of the system, that is reason enough to audit the system. Instead, we've now got this retardedly high standard of evidence - one that seemingly cannot be reached even with video documentation - in order to investigate the powers that be.
Meanwhile, private citizens are destroyed by random unproven allegations on social media; where the standards of evidence should be highest, they are now non-existent.