Not only that, but any creative work is the culmination of a trillion creative desicions large and small.
Ideology is making an increasingly larger number of those dicisions for them, by now the majority, and that's why everything made by ideologues is trash.
They're not doing this for 0.1% of the population. They're doing this because they're under the control of a brain virus that is compelling them to force into existence a new culture where hierarchies are formed with the woke at the top.
They're underperforming because they have low IQs, anything else like 'entitlement' or 'they're failing because we help them too much', or whatever else you invent is just cope, rationalization, and post hoc garbage.
There is no reality in which a demographic with a 85 IQ average could do well or compete in modern societies where high information processing skills are required to function.
Besides just the ability to retain and manipulate information IQ correlates extremely well with long term orientation, the ability to delay gratification, crime, low impulse control, violence, success, tolerance of ambiguity, knowledge aquisition, ability for deliberate action, self control, risk managment, ability to learn, and a whole other list of abilities that modern societies expect.
You can collect a group of whites with a 85 IQ average in a neighbourhood and within a couple of generations they will have perfectly recreated for you the inner city life.
Imagine thinking that affirmative action is what's causing violence....
No resentment caused by being made to compete in societies where they can feel they can't possibley succeed is what's causing violence.
Crime being the only viable path to material wealth unless you're artistically or athlethically gifted is what's causing violence.
This is a brilliant idea!
Instead of anti-white we should start using 'whitephobia'.
While 'anti-white' insinuates a deliberate position, 'whitephobia' insinuates a state of being unhinged, mentally unwell, unable to control emotions.
And as a bonus it subtly mocks the left's use of -phobia for everythig.
Don't reveal your power level. Nothing good can come from it.
Fan service = Lack of propaganda
Literally means you're giving people something that makes them happy, instead of trying to brainwash them for the greater good.
Therefore fan service is problematic. It's a missed opportunity and it provides respite, which might in itself undermine other brainwashing efforts.
What movie is that image from?
As someone who has never watched a single episode, is it worth going to the old series?
Where should I start?
This is based on a survey where 97% or so responded that yes, the greenhouse effect is a plausible hypothesis and it's likely that humans are having some effect on the climate.
That same survey only had about 2% or so agree with any sort of doomsday scenario.
Men value looks yes. But we're willing to compromise. More or equally important is kindness, a sense of humor, positivity, peace, meekness, submissiveness, and having common interests.
The women who can't connect or make a relationship work have none of those qualities.
They themselves are looking for men who are strong, powerful, successful, well off, career focused, confident, arrogant, flashy, charming, dominant, leaders, etc.
And they mold themselves into that, thinking that's what men want as well.
Then there they sit with their money, arrogance, condecention, success, dominant personalities, high society habits, and tinder pics next to expensive cars and wonder where all the good men are.
Men aren't turned on by that at all, they are repulsed by it.
The equivalent are boys who think that women like nice, soft, passive, submissive guys, because girls themselves are nice and soft. They end up equally bitter, wondering where all the goof girls are, afterall they should be throwing themselves after someone this kind and obedient and subservient.
The world doesn't work that way.
https://www.teenvogue.com/story/survey-says-young-people-dont-identify-as-straight
57% of respondents said they don't fit into the traditional definition of heterosexuality
Interesting how they they don't break this down by gender. I wonder if it's mostly women identifying as bi / lesbian.
Just to clarify, with "same guy" he is not referring to me.
It was always designed as an infiltration mechanic to proselytize socially degenerative behaviour.
Why? What's the endgame?
Diversity is always bad.
Accidental diversity is neutral. If you make choices with absolutely no regard for inclusion, and only pick the best people and the most true-to-the-story ideas, and you unwittingly end up with a diverse team, or diverse characters which make sense in your story's setting.
But we all know that's not what Diversity means to these people. You know it's no accident that they ended up being "led by women at almost every corner".
They'll keep failing, because their theory that anyone can do anything equally well is wrong.
It's funny how "I don't care", or "I dissagree", or "I think you're wrong" fills them with rage and suffering.
It's an attack on their ideology that they can't refute, and it fills them with anger.
They want you to engage.
A paralell society that just ignores them, and doesn't reward them with money or attention, is the only thng they're truly worried about.
issues like poor problem-solving skills, impulsivity, problems with regulating emotions, and poor self-esteem were found to be quite common in suspected perpetrators
Researchers also highlighted that migrants’ overrepresentation in sex crime could not be explained alone by social disadvantage, citing mental illness, antisocial behavior, the use of intoxicants, and a criminal past as other contributing risk factors.
What could it be... We just don't have a concept that can explain this at all. If only IQ hadn't already been debunked by marxists.
The role on academia in the next decades will be to clean the records.
They will scrub everything unwanted. Texts, data, studies, records, books, papers. It will all be memoryholed.
You can't have data or studies casting doubt on blank slate theory, or consequntialism as a sound ethical model. You can't just have stuff like heritability and twin studies lying around.
Academia will be reduced to a toolbox to support leftist thought. It's already almost there.
They'll hide the methodology behind paywalls, traditions and customs, groupthink, and gaslighting, and people will only see the headlines.
Lo and behold - it turns out that the leftists were right all along! About everything! Look, the Science proves it!
In the future the Pence rule will extend to any public or private interaction, IRL or online.
Got to love it.
They can have their precious independence, while boys can have mentorship, unsolicited advice, correction, ego checks, and truth.
Let's see how this strategy of responding with guile, hatred, condecention, and rightousness works out for them.
Your house loans and student loans are probably the last things you should be putting money into.
Their interest rates are between 2%-3%, which is very managable. As long as you can expect a higher yield than 3% on your assets then you're earning by investing.
The stock market gives on average 10% per year (over the last 100 years), so even just putting your money into an index fund will outperform your loan interests.
Secondly, inflation. Your loan amount stays the same, but inflation is making that amount worth less every year. So while inflation is hurting your savings, it's helping you with your loans, they're getting devalued.
Ok, but what about risk?
If we're talking about the risk for runaway inflation, then you should definitly not put extra money into paying back loans, as they will devalue too.
And if we're seeing massive inflation, why would the price of things denominated in the inflationary asset go down? Presumably they would go up. Just because there's massive inflation doesn't mean that stocks will crash.
In times of high inflation, people want to borrow money. Which means more money in circulation, which means securities and correlated assets should be expected to go up, because where else would you put your money?
If the stock market crashes, and you are young, let's say in your 20s or even 30s, then you're probably still fine since historically the 10% return has remained even through rough times, if you give it a couple of decades.
Real estate is not as profitable as most people think, unless you're a deveolper. Just buying a home you should think more about as something you're doing for the next generation. If it weren't for the costs associated, it'd be a better move than an index fund. But because of the costs, unless you can afford unexpected expenses, and hard times where taxes are still due, then the risk is higher than some index fund.
These kind of stories and narratives should be pushed and celebrated.
More diversity and less meritocracy in areas that they already control is good.
The prediction is that it's a bad idea and will lead to the errosion of the institution until it falls. So it should be welcomed.
In chess you can speed ahead with your own plan (beginner), you can try to prevent your opponent's plan (intermediate), or you can allow him to complete his plan but throw off his timing and position yourelf to play around him (advanced).
Let them extend all their energy trying to fix their own spheres. They should be pushed with some sort of not enough X in industry Y daily. Accelerationism should be the rights primary strategy.
Add Bill and Ted to your list.
HAHA! It was about their daughters all along! Whamen stronk Bill and Ted losers lol lol lol
Where is the neonatal allele strand that determines height?