No. No hypocrisy at all. Standard practice.
Why Thomas? He's the best Justice on the bench. He should have been promoted to Chief Justice.
Amend the constitution to say that State laws overwrite Federal rulings and Federal regulations. (If a State bothered to pass a law on say abortion and the Federal government didn't, then the courts default to State law rather than Starry Decisis or Chevron Deference.)
"I have no idea how the law works."
Undo the nuclear option from 2013. (Bring it back to a 2/3rd majority to moderate the SCOTUS and prevent to the vitriol we have seen from every vacancy since then.)
No. The Senate evil over Supreme Court nominations began with Robert Bork's and (especially) Clarence Thomas's nominations, in 1987 and 1991, respectively.
All of the problems in U.S. jurisprudence stem from three causes:
- Revocation of "loser pays." In the U.K., any legal defense costs past the process of discovery (a pre-trial gathering of information about the case) can be assessed to an unsuccessful plaintiff. The U.S. ended that in the Federalist era, since so many British subjects were suing for lost property during the Revolution.
- Re-imposition of the distinction between "solicitor" and "barrister" in U.S. law. Remember how people complain that the U.S. has 10,000x the lawyers the UK has? That is because the U.S. removed the distinction between a solicitor (who gives legal advice) and barrister (a much more qualified lawyer who can try a case) back when a qualified barrister was hard to find on the frontier. Most U.S. lawyers could be replaced with solicitors, since all they do is file legal paperwork for businesses. The lack of solicitors and the presence of Legal Aid is why poorer people cannot afford decent legal advice.
- The Fourteenth Amendment says absolutely nothing but that each state must enforce its laws without regard to race. That's it. Under Plessy v. Ferguson the Supreme Court declared that of course this meant that states could legally segregate their population by race. Under Brown v. Board of Education, this now means that the government can violate Freedom of Association (again) by mandating integration.
Fix those three laws, and 80% of our problems (tort abuse, access to legal services, massive Federal overreach) will disappear.
This man was murdered by a public prosecutor for crimethink.
In other news, exactly how many morons will continue to create legal defense funds for non-Leftists for GoFundMe/Patreon/Indiegogo and the like to cancel, leaving the alleged beneficiary even more depressed than before? Use SubscribeStar, it hasn't canceled a single conservative/libertarian yet. If you know of any others, please leave a reply.
https://satwcomic.com/masquerade
After my last comic so many Americans were like “The Scandinavian countries are so smart and we can’t even get Americans to wear masks” but the Scandinavian countries haven’t even suggested that people wear masks. All they’ve done is tell people to wear masks abroad because they otherwise risk getting a fine in countries where masks are mandatory.
Of course, this doesn't mean Scandis are somehow smarter...
/pol/ level trolling
This doesn't quite rate. This is simple inversion; it lacks the twist of "it's okay to be white" or "Islam is right about women."
You'd be better off with a pic of Malcolm X, and his quote about white liberals being black people's worst enemy, over a pic of Biden and Harris, along with an anti-Biden quote.
The leftist did. And the host was confused and let it happen, and then had to apologize to Newt the next day. (Host Harris Faulkner is black, and is probably still programmed to let anything that smells like a racism accusation against a white to fly.)
Andrew Klavan, Jewish writer, "Why aren't we going to mention George Soros? Because George Soros is an evil-doer who uses his money to do evil, he has been doing evil for a long time, and he believes America is the problem with the world.... and he is a collection of anti-Semitic cliches. He's cosmopolitan, he has no loyalty to any state, he uses his money to operate behind the scenes, he's very wealthy and he uses that money to influence politics."
"The old system" is ESI, employer-sponsored (health) insurance. The old system is what led us directly to the massive failure we are experiencing now.
"These days"??
Welcome to the party, pal!
https://www.city-journal.org/html/america%E2%80%99s-most-successful-communist-12882.html
https://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2014/01/28/pete-seegers-totalitarian-trifecta-n258270
An interesting take, but would his response be any different if the wokesters were Asian? If not, then I don't see how his response is anti-white.
Sorry to Poe and Adams, but MM got there first:
Muggeridge’s Law: there is no way that a writer of fiction can compete with real life for its pure absurdity.
Poe's original law said: "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article."
The same happened to Muggeridge:
When Malcolm Muggeridge was the editor of the British satirical magazine Punch in the early 1960s, Khrushchev had announced he was going to tour England alongside its prime minister. Muggeridge wrote up a list of the silliest tour stops he could think of, and then put the article to bed, ready for publication. When the actual tour list was drawn up, he had to massively rewrite the article. At least half the tour stops in his satirical piece were actually on Khrushchev and the British PM’s agenda.
Because he doesn't run around screeching "CUNT! CUUUUUNT!" at the top of his lungs like a deranged Lefty?