7
send_it 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can't really help themselves when the content they're looking for is simply not available on bitchute etc.

Even when a channel decides to switch platforms, their old library still remains on Youtube unless they decide to reupload hundreds or thousands of videos.

11
send_it 11 points ago +11 / -0

The problem is it won't blow up in their face, HR will make sure to find a straight white man (or what ever else is the lowest in the current oppression olympics) to blame.

7
send_it 7 points ago +7 / -0

no offense, but... you've bought a game programmed by progressives. What the heck did you expect?!

6
send_it 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not during the clinical trials it needs to pass in order to be approved for sale, no.

https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/should-pregnant-women-be-included-clinical-trials

Don't get me wrong, the actions taken around thalidomide AFTER its VEGF-blocking side effects became known are probably the worst example of recklessness and medical malpractice since the Tuskegee syphilis study - but they probably legitimately didn't know before clearing it for sale.

4
send_it 4 points ago +5 / -1

The thalidomide issue is a bad example: it couldn't have been caught in clinical trials to begin with - you don't test drugs on pregnant women.

10
send_it 10 points ago +10 / -0

We already fuck them and cover for the muzzies and britbong elites doing the same so why bother now?

-brit presstitutes, probably

1
send_it 1 point ago +1 / -0

He'd probably be salivating at the prospect of getting to role-play Vidkun Quisling.

6
send_it 6 points ago +8 / -2

Whoa! Cool it with the antisemitism.

1
send_it 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't care who he is. Point out the flaw in the argument or the contradiction between person and argument where it makes sense - or take your holier than thou attitude and shove it.

2
send_it 2 points ago +2 / -0

Impressive, the guy who used to be grandstanding loudly about arguing the point instead of the person is being a twat when confronted about him hypocritically arguing the person instead of the point.

Here, let me make it really simple and straight-forward for you.

What u/theimpossible1 said:

  1. Marine Le Pen has baggage 2. France was unable to find a more suitable leader than her.

This is objectively true, leaving aside the moral brouhaha surrounding her she has a) breached the rules of the European Parliament by installing her own love interest as a parlamentary secretary in her election district and b) been convicted of defrauding the European Parliament in favor of Front National employees to the tune of roughly 300k Euro.

  1. She would probably be a worse leader than Macron

This is an opinion which sounds reasonable enough given the aforementioned baggage.

What you responded with:

lmao women hater hates women


Ad hominem as defined by...

Merriam-Webster:

marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made

Oxford English Dictionary

(of a criticism, etc.) directed against a person, rather than against what that person says:

dictionary.com

attacking an opponent's character or motives rather than answering the argument or claim.


Okay, what ever mate.

1
send_it 1 point ago +1 / -0

Their chance of winning without cheating

Maybe... but they are cheating.

7
send_it 7 points ago +7 / -0

The problem is, the moment they're about to get what they fucking deserve they pack up and leave to ruin another state.

5
send_it 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here's what that cunt of a "judge" wrote.

Justice Andrew Nicol said Depp has “not succeeded in his action for libel.” He added that the defendants had shown what they published was "substantially true.”

Articles written on the basis of an admittedly false accusation are "substantially true" because pussy, according to this disgrace of a human being.

7
send_it 7 points ago +7 / -0

we haven't really come up with good feedback mechanisms to deal with bad female behavior

Funny thing is, we used to have them. Then discrimination and social ostracization were engineered to become a bad thing.

18
send_it 18 points ago +21 / -3

And the same cops will stand back when you're attacked but intervene and arrest you the moment you defend yourself.

Sorry but my pity well is truly empty.

8
send_it 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well he's partially correct - the French are directly responsible for what happened there because they let those savages in.

10
send_it 10 points ago +10 / -0

The "good in you" is worthless when you shove it aside while you stab Lady Liberty in the back.

18
send_it 18 points ago +18 / -0

"Victim blaming" is a nonsensical term anyways.

Sometimes the victim directly contributed to what happened (e.g. walking through the hood at 2am drunk and decked out in jewellery, getting into the car of a person you don't know, or inviting millions of inbred neanderthals with a violent extremism problem into your country). If you can't talk about that and just base your entire perception of reality off of "But I shouldn't have to!", the problem won't go away - it'll just hit you like a truck of peace because you live your entire life assuming that everything goes well at all times.

4
send_it 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ontario

spirituality mumbojumbo

Now just what are the chances that these people are directly responsible for the current state of Canada via their voting habits?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›