Impressive, the guy who used to be grandstanding loudly about arguing the point instead of the person is being a twat when confronted about him hypocritically arguing the person instead of the point.
Here, let me make it really simple and straight-forward for you.
Marine Le Pen has baggage 2. France was unable to find a more suitable leader than her.
This is objectively true, leaving aside the moral brouhaha surrounding her she has a) breached the rules of the European Parliament by installing her own love interest as a parlamentary secretary in her election district and b) been convicted of defrauding the European Parliament in favor of Front National employees to the tune of roughly 300k Euro.
She would probably be a worse leader than Macron
This is an opinion which sounds reasonable enough given the aforementioned baggage.
What you responded with:
lmao women hater hates women
Ad hominem as defined by...
Merriam-Webster:
marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made
Oxford English Dictionary
(of a criticism, etc.) directed against a person, rather than against what that person says:
dictionary.com
attacking an opponent's character or motives rather than answering the argument or claim.
I don't care who he is. Point out the flaw in the argument or the contradiction between person and argument where it makes sense - or take your holier than thou attitude and shove it.
breaking, ad hominem is still not an argument.
BREAKING: that was not an ad hominem.
Impressive, the guy who used to be grandstanding loudly about arguing the point instead of the person is being a twat when confronted about him hypocritically arguing the person instead of the point.
Here, let me make it really simple and straight-forward for you.
What u/theimpossible1 said:
This is objectively true, leaving aside the moral brouhaha surrounding her she has a) breached the rules of the European Parliament by installing her own love interest as a parlamentary secretary in her election district and b) been convicted of defrauding the European Parliament in favor of Front National employees to the tune of roughly 300k Euro.
This is an opinion which sounds reasonable enough given the aforementioned baggage.
What you responded with:
Ad hominem as defined by...
Merriam-Webster:
Oxford English Dictionary
dictionary.com
Okay, what ever mate.
Apparently, you have no idea who TheImpossible is. Good to know.
I don't care who he is. Point out the flaw in the argument or the contradiction between person and argument where it makes sense - or take your holier than thou attitude and shove it.