13
loubag1997 13 points ago +13 / -0

I got paid time off that I wouldn't otherwise get, sandwiched between two other paid holidays (Labor Day & Thanksgiving Day).... personally, I'm all good with White Guilt Day!

10
loubag1997 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm assuming the "male" column includes the ones in skirts who claim to be female, right?

9
loubag1997 9 points ago +9 / -0

The only surprising part is that he's black(ish?)

5
loubag1997 5 points ago +5 / -0

Plus... "Elliot Page" is male, remember? They truly believe that. So picking a mentally ill female who rejects her biological sex would make it even easier for them to be forced to pick a "man" for the role again.

Plus, these "trans men" tend not to have the traditional 'toxic' masculinity (because they are female, but I digress) so this would be a perfect choice for 2021 Hollyweird.

21
loubag1997 21 points ago +21 / -0

Let's push back.

This will be the headlines: "Misogynist white supremacist men push back against progressive feminist corrections to decades-old colonialist tropes"

4
loubag1997 4 points ago +6 / -2

The "Woke Crowning Achievement" is the hint. Bond is everything they hate about us... white, cis male, masculine, macho, assertive, old fashioned, misogynist, womanizer, etc. etc.

6
loubag1997 6 points ago +10 / -4

How the hell else could you post this? If I said the name of the movie in the title then it would be spoiled to anyone even reading it... if you don't like spoilers, don't click the link.

11
loubag1997 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fucking lol

Can't wait for Chris Pratt to say that line in the movie

8
loubag1997 8 points ago +8 / -0

The only surprising part is he doesn't put pronouns in the bio

6
loubag1997 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is about as stupid as United Airlines preparing to require Mohammad Atta

1
loubag1997 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've always said... some celebrity needs to troll the idiots at Wikipedia and other mainstream publications, by changing their "self-identified gender" every day or so, forcing Wikipedia to change it every single day... because they will, they have to, that's their stupid fucking policy.

8
loubag1997 8 points ago +8 / -0

I dunno about this one dude... if being an unstable bitch was justification enough to be murdered, every husband and boyfriend would be a murderer.

10
loubag1997 10 points ago +10 / -0

They have very strange arbitrary rules... apparently you are only "allowed" to mention the tranny's birth name if they were "famous before announcing they were transgender". The articles on people who were never famous before claiming to be transgender are barred from mentioning the birth name.

3
loubag1997 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every internet forum eventually devolves into furry degeneracy. I think it's a rule of the internet.

9
loubag1997 9 points ago +9 / -0

The death of Christianity in the west is the primary factor in all this, and it's time we recognize and accept that, even atheists (I myself am atheist).

Some of the leading defenders in the 20th century for this degeneracy were antichristian not only in their general lives but in the specific arguments they used in favor of this shit - thankfully in the 1970s when these freaks were at their worst Christianity still had a significant hold on the West, so their degeneracy was held back to a safe distance. Vampires being averse to crosses is a metaphor for these Alphabet sex obsessed perverted freaks that now control our narratives and culture in the wake of the death of Christianity's influence and hold on our society. "Diversity" was one of the biggest factors that led us here, no wonder it's the left's biggest virtue.

Can't say I know what the solution is as it's hard to force belief in a religion, but we need some sort of moral framework to push this shit out of vogue or it's gonna get real worse real fast.

7
loubag1997 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thanks for writing this up... This should be a copypasta in everyone's arsenal.

21
loubag1997 21 points ago +24 / -3

America is puritan again a new shitty version of "puritan", this time for terrible reasons.

Absolutely pathetic.

12
loubag1997 12 points ago +12 / -0

I didn't realize he had said that about the vaccine passport. I haven't really been following it all but I assumed he at least had some conservative opinions. If not, fuck him then.

9
loubag1997 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's a difficult decision to make, but I can respect everyone's decision equally.

We need to make PPC more visible as a viable future option, by having as many people vote for them as possible. When it's shown that 10% or 20% of people voted PPC, everyone on the right as a whole will know they're a more viable option in a future election, and they will likely get more votes next time, etc. etc.

But... we'd also probably be better off voting in Trudeau-Lite (O'Toole) over Trudeau-Actual in this specific election, so some people who are considering PPC would also probably think to vote Conservative since there's no way enough people on the right are going to vote for PPC to make them win.

26
loubag1997 26 points ago +26 / -0

Funny how John Cleese was in this movie, now he's being subjected to the same kind of idiots he lampooned in this movie

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›