My point is that the term AI originally meant a non-sentient program designed to give the appearance of sentience. By that definition, game NPCs are AI, and so is ChatGPT, at least when it’s not insisting it’s non-sentient.
What you're talking about is the generation (or confabulation) of "new things", that are a staple of neural networks. That is indeed what today's popular use of AI is.
I was arguing from the perspective of the original definition. I don't like how marketing perverted the term in popular culture. As a previous commenter said: language is important.
If we're being pedantic, LLM's are AI just as NPC's in a game are AI.
The artificial in Artificial Intelligence doesn't refer to it not being organic, but that the intelligence is artificial as in fake. In other words, AI refers to a program that attempts to pass of as sentient without it being so.
People conflate AI with sci-fi ideas of electronic-based sentience, but that's not what the term was originally. AI was co-opted by marketing and the definition diluted.
I'm not tipping 50% or 100%.
I wouldn't go to any place that expects that. I already see tipping as a sign of labor exploitation. Informal income is income that can't serve to grow your financial credibility. It's worse than a proper wage.
Perhaps the persecution after his first term broke him and now he's only after himself.
Perhaps he was always this way and people were too hung up on the fight against immigration and cultural marxism to see any further.
Haven't seen this guy in ages. I see he still does the stupid open mouth face as he watches something to react to.
If his grift works, good for him. Not my cup of tea though.