What should we use, then?

It's not a bullseye bullet heatmap?

I don't trust complaints about unfair algorithms. Most of the time it's people who are losing popularity out of their own decisions.

He still groomed a minor.

Every content creator past their peak complains about being targeted.

I haven't really watched him too much in nearly a year
when I listen to too much of him, I gotta take a break

There's the real answer. That plus his fall of grace after he groomed a girl and had her move in with him as soon as she was 18, the way he treated her in the leaked audios, and the defense simping for Melonie Mac's hypocrisy.

Now, I know nothing about you or your channel, but from the title it appears that you're uploading the audio of a copyrighted song?

Aren't most school shooters native to the country?

True.

I don't know, man. Perhaps he sold out for the new show. Perhaps he was always this way and the conservative parody made everyone see whatever they wanted to see in him. And perhaps... he's just an actor and it was the old writers who were the talent.

I also have no idea what you tried to say.

I barely touched the last one,

In San Andreas, when you saw a dam, you knew a mission would take you to it. In GTA V, you see a large prison and you never have reason to visit. The world was made for online. Single player was tacked on.

The design decision to make the game multiplayer-focused ruined the potential that the game could have had.

If the terms of a service came with the condition of watching ads, and if one agreed to that deal, blocking ads would constitute a kind of fraud, but not piracy. Piracy refers to violating digital copyright.

Blocking ads might be fraud, but it's not piracy.

Is their point that sex causes cancer?

His name and address has been known for a long time. The only thing the internet doesn't know is what he looks like, which kinda furthers the interest.

In his words, he just couldn't "get behind the 'fuck grandma' argument".

This is wrong.

I began this post writing that it was plagiarism, but then I realized that not every "AI retracing" is that. Then I considered whether it was his malice that made it wrong, but satire, parody and criticism can often be just as searing.

Then it dawned on me. It is the fact that the "retrace" is posted without any mention to the original work. That's what makes it wrong. It's not plagiarism, but erasure. A denial of authorship. It is a wrong thing to do regardless of malice, intellectual property or copyright.

The guy says he did it to piss off the original artist. I believe this is a worse thing to do than a mere insult. He would be singing a different tune if his writings were rephrased by AI and reposted by someone else.

So apparently teenagers have been really destructive? Had to really dig into the article and comments to understand the reason.

Kiddo, even if you are correct, at some point you're responsible for how you end up. Plenty of people have it worse and do better.

Yeah it's definitely fake.

The idea is that they'll lose just that, millions of dollars in lost sales as people gravitate away from them and towards brands that don't do subscriptions.

I hadn't seen it.

His height makes it parodical.

But seriously, what a nightmare. He went in to make it all about himself. It's probably an eternal pattern with him.

Never pay for this crap. Do not allow it to become successful.

Subscriptions allow the sellers to become lazy. VW should be kept in their toes.

Healthcare jobs will continue to be in high demand for the rest of our lifetimes. Becoming a nurse and/or specializing in elder care is one of the most job-secure career paths there are in this generation.

Fair point.

Taking down old trees does feel like a crime of some kind.