There is no law, only the right of the stronger. The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must.
Absolutely true, as it always has been. But particularly galling that they maintain their strength through a false 'legitimacy' that is nothing more than lies backed by an implicit threat of violence. And that they hoard that strength while convincing the masses that weakness is virtue.
. If he's guilty, don't try to get him acquitted, get his sentence lessened or transferred to nicer prison.
They can encourage that but the defendant still runs the show. If a guilty client doesn't want to admit it the lawyer has to defend their 'innocence', even if it means scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Much of our legal system has become a clown show, but scumbag lawyers saying scumbag things is ironically a good thing. It's a sign of a system that values a fair trial, or at least pretends to. Just have to hope Lake's lawyers are good enough to knock it down and the judge is smart enough to see through it not a corrupt piece of shit
Political correctness never makes any art better. Only a worthless hack would say it does.
I don't care if you think making a 'caring' game is better than one with unrestrained humor, if you had to self censor because of outside pressure it's already less than it should have been.
He has to tell himself that everything before CURRENT YEAR was mean spirited and horrible because that's the only way to quiet the cognitive dissonance that tells him what a sellout he is. He knows it isn't true. This is pure cope, manifesting as moral grandstanding
people will criticise that and say ‘woke culture, PC police’ and stuff – but for any art, I’m thinking about how my art will be interpreted by the viewer.
Bullshit Tim. This just means you can't make anyone uncomfortable and the habitually offended are dictating the path of your game. Your 'comedy' will be surface level fluff at best. You have failed.
I try to remember that under a working legal system it's the job of defense attorneys to defend the indefensible, but this is still infuriatingly dishonest.
'You reap what you sow'. They're acting like Lake fucked up and has no right to complain. Guess what? It wasn't Lake they disenfranchised, it was THE FUCKING VOTERS! And he dares to talk about respecting elections while arguing that we shouldn't be allowed to question them and it's okay to botch election day and fuck over thousands of voters? With this fake ass, manipulative display of 'passion'?
Go to hell.
This is what sedition 'trust the experts' gets you. A federal police force that uncritically believes propaganda taught to them by self professed experts with bullshit qualifications.
I think many of the the cabal believe what they're doing is right, and it's thanks to things like this. That's even more dangerous than a cynical opponent.
The compromised institutions educate 'experts' who brainwash the 'authorities' who make and enforce laws that criminalize dissent and prevent challenge to the institutions. Nobody has to take personal responsibility for the ensuing hellscape because they all outsourcing their thinking and morals to someone else.
We already knew this is how they think about us and our struggles, not just white men but all the peasants
But it doesn't make it any less disgusting to see it laid bare.
It's not a big problem if they want to be a man pretending to be a woman, it's a big problem when they force it on everyone with the 'I'm literally a woman and you're oppressing me if you don't enable it' garbage.
If that were true they would identify as a woman, not as trans
So when the ESG funds run out, they got even less talent, more overheads and an even bigger hole to climb out of.
They can't think more than two minutes into the future. Most of society's problems are caused by people incapable of long term thinking, and the widespread encouragement of immediate gratification
Change my mind.
Get fucked
I hope she receives all the harassment she caused others and then some
Get fucked
I hope she receives all the harassment she caused others and then some
Almost all of it can be traced back to universities and NGOs
And the people responsible for the weimar republic
an increasingly woke Games Workshop
Games Wokeshop
Woman: "Oh darling, I want to follow my heart and dreams and care for the sick." Man: "So I am going to have to earn more money while you gain satisfaction from your job? Because the mortgage doesn't fucking are how satisfied I am at work."
So here is the question: Are you going to subsidize her doing what she wants while you bust your hump? To follow up, are you going to thank her for her sacrifice, and then do even more chores?
Okay those are good points. A domestic partnership should recognize the impact that one person's choices have on the other. Taking a fulfilling job over a well paying job sounds great in theory but if that means a partner has to pick up the slack then they need to discuss it and come to an agreement. Of course, feminism tells women that they should do whatever they want and any second not spent fulfilling every whim they have is tragic oppression, so anyone advocating for rationality is facing an uphill battle.
But in OP's scenario, he wasn't busting his hump and she was. She was the one who was stressed and overworked. My whole point was that 'I'm smart and you're not, so you can suffer while I put my feet up' doesn't make for a healthy partnership. But if they want to have a conversation about her chosen career demanding too much and paying too little, and how that affects the rest of the family, that's fair.
Yes, they have the institutions and the influence. There's no denying that. But we are starting to win the people. Or rather, they're losing them. It's hard to say yet, there's decades of propaganda to be undone. But truth is on our side and they can only suppress that so much.
I don't know what you do except that it requires a master's in statistics, does it provide a more worthwhile service to society than caring for the sick? You are much less replaceable than a nurse so sure, from a supply and demand perspective your work is worth more. It's not lesser than hers. But in present terms, hers is more work if you are, by your own words, enjoying a very easy job and she is working hard and stressed from it.
We're likely on the same page, mostly. More goes into assessing value than just what you see on the surface. Feminist messaging is all about ignoring reality in order to coddle women and push all responsibility onto men.
I'm just saying a domestic partnership should be about supporting each other and the larger family, not deciding that you get to put in less work (that you have more time and energy to do) because you're more intelligent and educated than your overworked partner.
I agree in general but there are still some lines we need to be careful about crossing. It's not always easy to walk things back once you've started them. These things have inertia.
At the very least I don't think conservatives should secretly collude to censor, because that's not colluding against the enemy it's colluding against the people.
And being shown to not do that when democrats are doing it freely could gain us a lot of support. We're starting to win the battle for hearts and minds and we shouldn't underestimate the importance of that, we need to be really careful about anything that could ruin it.
Fight back, and fight back using their weapons, but if possible, fight back with a rallying cry from the people you're fighting for, not a chorus of boos.
She now thinks I should contribute more to the household work because I have an easier job despite the fact I earn twice as much as she does. Just because I'm smarter and worked hard to get to where I am doesn't mean I should have to do more work at home simply because of her lack of competence. But women will see it this way.
I agree with the wiring part but not with this. Your intelligence and 8 years of schooling are part of the value you bring to this hypothetical scenario, but you're trying to create a division of labor that works for your family. Being all 'I shouldn't have to do the extra work I clearly have time and energy for, because I earned my easy job because I'm smarter than you' when she's working hard and struggling isn't healthy, and it's very adversarial. You make it sound like your first response to any discussion about fairness is to try and outsmart her so you get what you want and she doesn't.
Conservatives should be careful about playing the censorship game. They need to have the balls to fight fire with fire but also be aware that a huge part of their base cares about free speech and moral consistency. When the dust settles we need to be able to build something good and free.
OTOH, I'm fully in favor of 'enemies of free speech don't get free speech'. Yeah, yeah, free speech is only free speech when everyone has it, but one of the best ways to stop an enemy without principles is to show that you're willing to use the same weapons and tactics. Give them a reason to deescalate and care about the precedent their setting. The punishment fits the crime.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ITS ADOVOCATES AREN'T THE THINGS ERODING TRUTH YOU GASLIGHTING ASSHOLES
YOU DO THAT
YOU DO IT DELIBERATELY
YOU DO IT ALL THE TIME
Pointing out the hypocrisy has a purpose.
They don't care, but seeing their hypocrisy is what gets a lot of people from 'sounds reasonable to me' to 'wait a minute...' to 'do they just want to destroy me and my kind?'
If fear is causing mass heart attacks I guess we need to stop the climate change and covid and antivaxxer and election denier and racism and white supremacy and free speech is bad fearmongering, right?
Any day now.
By the way. A more serious response.
This is FUCKING VILE.
What you don't seem to realize is that women are victims of all this too.
They're extremely obnoxious, entitled victims who support our (and their) enemies because they've been fooled (by emotional manipulation, which they are highly susceptible to) into thinking we're the enemy and overthrowing us is good for them. But they are victims.
I recognized all these things individually but I've never seen them all laid out like that. Makes it obvious, doesn't it?
Pop ups and sidebars that won't leave you alone
sign up to our forum sign up to our forum sign up to our forum sign up to our forum
But as far as discussion goes, 'My brother in christ' is annoying because it's used mostly by non-Christians for the purpose of sarcasm and mockery. Most of them probably are just trying to sound funny, and aren't mocking Christians/Christianity on purpose, but it's still treating it like a punch line. It always reminds me how other religions are sacrosanct but it's acceptable to belittle Christianity