Clearly you want them to be in the wrong for some reason, but there isn't actually any good reason to think that.
They should have done this, should have done that, should be perfect all the time. Like no, the dude is at fault. He brought the conflict, he resisted, he had a gun, he died.
Sans malice, there's nothing unreasonable about what happened.
Their examples are hilarious:
Grok: Jan 6 was a riot by people protesting certification of the election.
Wikipedia: a self-coup attack by Trump and his Trumpers. Reeee.
Grok: Britain First is a far-right party for national sovereignty.
Wikipedia: they're a fascist hate group. Oh and also they're racist and sexist and kick dogs.
Gee I wonder which one is reasonable and neutral, it's so hard to tell. How is this not satire? They're literally insane, their mind is broken.
Because they're too stupid to learn from history that they are the problem.
Hell they had a settlement in like Zambia or wherever hundreds of years ago they got run out of. They couldn't even rule over literal morons without being genocided.
It's not even a morally bad shooting. Dude instigated conflict, he had a gun, he resisted, and he was shot. High level view, nothing immoral.
Only thing that would make this morally bad is if we thought the officer purposely shot him out of malice. I don't see any evidence of that at all.
It's not like the guy was disarmed for 30+ seconds. Last time the shooting officer looked at the holster there was a gun in it, then the crazy guy appeared to reach for the holster.
Totally justified. There's simply not enough time to process "I know there was a gun there but is it still there?" Even if they train for this specific case it's just slowing their reaction down when it matters more and the gun is still there. And they don't need to train for it because: don't fight the cops especially when you have a gun and don't reach for your holster even if it's empty.
Pretty much can assume Google is doing everything for some nefarious reason.
Here's one: they can pollute other company's AIs that scrape youtube with stuff that Google had been censoring and are censoring from their own AI. If they relax the censor then other AIs start knowing all about niggers in the moon and whatnot and the other companies have to put some effort into making them work/family safe.
Greenland is about securing the Arctic Circle for shipping.
But you're right, Trump is responsible in that he's not going anywhere near hard enough. He needs to declare Congress' fake session fake, fire Bondi, recess appoint a real AG, and fill the prisons.
left-wing party looked to be losing ... now had a large bump due to Trump's Greenland posturing.
Yeah and all those other times AfD were murdered, conservatives in EU were ahead and then mysteriously lost, and candidates taken off the ballot or arrested or debanked were also Trump's fault.
Only thing Greenland issue does is change how people say they'll vote. The people who said they were going to vote Right and now say they'd rather have more muslims and trannies to spite Trump were just using it to get leverage with their own left parties, like that Force the Vote thing where some democrats threatened to vote 3rd party (and then didn't).
Trump is partly responsible, but only for not going hard enough.
Which is a totally smoothbrained take, as everyone already knows & constantly states that Epstein was Mossad & all our elites are compromised.
My aged parents didn't know Epstein had anything to do with Israel or Jews until last year. Now one of them knows it and the other says not to talk about it or people might think you're gasp a Nahtze. Both think only Trump is compromised.
So once again, when I find out what Fuentes actually was saying it's perfectly reasonable.
You may not have noticed... but your brain did.
This is why autists fall victim to The Message much more; it's calibrated so you barely notice or tolerate it, but autists see the patterns and clues and take your "great movie 10/10" as support of it.
They think Trump does this because he's sooo desperate for a Nobel that he'll settle for somebody else's. In reality Trump does this to mock the Nobel for ignoring actual peace and giving prizes to people just for being black for example.
Better question is how have they not figured out Trump's messaging by now.
The rest of the alt right was banned, period.
So now you're agreeing with me that "he set up his own private streaming site ... Nobody else did this" whereas before you said "Nick was far from the only guy with this message". They are all got banned including Nick, Nick set up his own self-hosted type streaming, Nick was the only game in town.
Can you think of any other alt-right personalities that set up their own streaming site?
Personally I think Nick was flipped after his January 6 stunt, because there's no way he didn't get charged without protection.
He attended Trump's rally and didn't trespass the so what would they charge him with? This is classic Shadow, you latch on to some factoid which isn't right and that proves your totally unsubstantiated theory.
Maybe they didn't have much influence over Tuvalu, and as I recall he got dos'd on the regular so may not have even been using cloudflare.
If one of the most extremely persecuted voices has been secretly 'flipped' then you might as well hand in your hat, you've got no chance.
And let me get this straight, all the other alt-right that didn't get banned onto their own personal streaming service are okay but the one that did is the double agent secretly furthering Israel's plan?
There's like literally no conspiracy you won't subscribe to is there. All I have to do is invoke the word and you show up "nuh ah it's like totally real dude".
He came back because he set up his own private streaming site that was just him streaming to the void and a handful of followers. Nobody else did this so he was the only game in town for his kind of banned speech.
It doesn't have to be some conspiracy master plan where the jews faked trying to axe him in college to set him up as an anti-Israel later to marginalize the antizionists by being too extreme.
In general it's probably not the most complicated answer you can think of that's still possible. Popular message, only game in town. Simple.
"I'm not a biologist" --Ketanji
At least Jumanji has the excuse that she's actually not a biologist. Sure everybody over 3 years old should know this, but it's not in her job description.
This clown on the other hand is an obstetrician; it's literally her job to know the answer is "no, men cannot get pregnant".
As far as what attracted troons to Rust, I'm quite sure I have no idea.
Primarily because Rust was developed at Mozilla after it was infested by troons. So they latched on to it early because it was their baby (even though it was actual talented non-troon computer scientists that made it).
But also because they gravitate to rules and authoritarian systems so the more rules and the less choices in the language the better for them. They're generally not very intelligent so they want the guardrails to not make stupid choices. Paint by numbers.
Another one like this is Google's Go language. Rob Pike was at least troon-adjacent himself, but it attracted more than a normal share of weirdos because it dictated source formatting and file organization and a bunch of other arbitrary decisions for no good reason. They love arbitrary rules.
Do you mean gap? There's no discrepancy. Every line went up, before they got Maduro.
Adult citizen includes Democrats that would oppose Trump even for absolving their sins so that's why it's half as big as Republican.
Their job isn't to detain people like that guy. They're not state police that can arrest people for a litany of charges, they can only arrest for federal crimes.