Grok: Jan 6 was a riot by people protesting certification of the election.
Wikipedia: a self-coup attack by Trump and his Trumpers. Reeee.
Grok: Britain First is a far-right party for national sovereignty.
Wikipedia: they're a fascist hate group. Oh and also they're racist and sexist and kick dogs.
Gee I wonder which one is reasonable and neutral, it's so hard to tell. How is this not satire? They're literally insane, their mind is broken.
it's jizzmodo,(part of the same gawker network that used to run kotaku) so no surprise there. only reason i even saw the story is it popped up in the start page for firefox. caught the headline first, then saw who it was from.
I see what you mean. As a Christian I still use LLMs. I’d say they’re about as reliable as asking a stranger at a gas station. Sometimes they’ll give you a fresh perspective, but never take their output as gospel.
LLMs are a great tool if used properly. Combined with other tools they can drastically speed up some workflows.
Citing on another? You mean just like the cursed 14 articles that started this mess? AI is guilty of emulating humanity in most autistic manner possible. Be not afraid of looking at it, You're only seeing a honest reflection.
Citing one another happens everywhere if you step back far enough. Let's not pretend you go out of your way to put a thermometer in your stove just to verify that water does in fact boil at 100C.
I'm not trusting AI blindly mind you. I'm trusting it because the conclusions and facts coming from it dont turn me into a oikophobic midwit who splurges his family's inheritence, cut his own dick off mid-process and blame everyone else while thinking himself righteous.
I never had enough suspension of disbelief to accept the premise of shows like Matrix because I just could not accept the possibility that humanity could be THIS FUCKING DUMB. But now I look forward to our machine overlord takeover and hope machines will pick up on my autism to let me live in 01: white clothes, barefeet in sterile laboratory/hospital setting and everything.
halucination happens anyway, constantly, it's why they have the little disclaimers about checking facts everywhere. at least there's a counter-balance to the wikipedos this way, though.
"They" tell the left he is a white supreme yahtzee, and they tell the right he is a gay mexican. Either way "they" dont want anyone to hear what he is saying.
He cant be both the exact opposite entity to exact opposite groups.
If you have two choices in anything, where one choice is dominated by transgender communists and the other one isn't, then there's exactly one correct choice.
Their examples are hilarious:
Grok: Jan 6 was a riot by people protesting certification of the election.
Wikipedia: a self-coup attack by Trump and his Trumpers. Reeee.
Grok: Britain First is a far-right party for national sovereignty.
Wikipedia: they're a fascist hate group. Oh and also they're racist and sexist and kick dogs.
Gee I wonder which one is reasonable and neutral, it's so hard to tell. How is this not satire? They're literally insane, their mind is broken.
it's jizzmodo,(part of the same gawker network that used to run kotaku) so no surprise there. only reason i even saw the story is it popped up in the start page for firefox. caught the headline first, then saw who it was from.
LLMs citing one another IS a bad thing. They're going to hallucinate in a circle and then retards will take it as gospel.
Though Grok is probably more accurate than wikipedia weirdos at this point.
Indeed. Is it a lack of god that causes people to take ai as truth above all else? Still searching for a supreme authority while mocking “sky daddy”.
I see what you mean. As a Christian I still use LLMs. I’d say they’re about as reliable as asking a stranger at a gas station. Sometimes they’ll give you a fresh perspective, but never take their output as gospel.
LLMs are a great tool if used properly. Combined with other tools they can drastically speed up some workflows.
So basically how Wikipedia works now except with humans?
Citing on another? You mean just like the cursed 14 articles that started this mess? AI is guilty of emulating humanity in most autistic manner possible. Be not afraid of looking at it, You're only seeing a honest reflection.
Citing one another happens everywhere if you step back far enough. Let's not pretend you go out of your way to put a thermometer in your stove just to verify that water does in fact boil at 100C.
I'm not trusting AI blindly mind you. I'm trusting it because the conclusions and facts coming from it dont turn me into a oikophobic midwit who splurges his family's inheritence, cut his own dick off mid-process and blame everyone else while thinking himself righteous.
I never had enough suspension of disbelief to accept the premise of shows like Matrix because I just could not accept the possibility that humanity could be THIS FUCKING DUMB. But now I look forward to our machine overlord takeover and hope machines will pick up on my autism to let me live in 01: white clothes, barefeet in sterile laboratory/hospital setting and everything.
halucination happens anyway, constantly, it's why they have the little disclaimers about checking facts everywhere. at least there's a counter-balance to the wikipedos this way, though.
To be fair, MSM has been doing the exact same thing for decades.
Ask it to summarize Nick Fuentes.
"They" tell the left he is a white supreme yahtzee, and they tell the right he is a gay mexican. Either way "they" dont want anyone to hear what he is saying.
He cant be both the exact opposite entity to exact opposite groups.
see for yourself, lol : https://grokipedia.com/page/Nick_Fuentes
i dont know why i was thinking this was a Twitter only thing. but thanks
No worries, i just figured out grok has a chatgpt-like frontend as well myself recently, lol.
If you have two choices in anything, where one choice is dominated by transgender communists and the other one isn't, then there's exactly one correct choice.