I see what you mean. As a Christian I still use LLMs. I’d say they’re about as reliable as asking a stranger at a gas station. Sometimes they’ll give you a fresh perspective, but never take their output as gospel.
LLMs are a great tool if used properly. Combined with other tools they can drastically speed up some workflows.
Citing on another? You mean just like the cursed 14 articles that started this mess? AI is guilty of emulating humanity in most autistic manner possible. Be not afraid of looking at it, You're only seeing a honest reflection.
Citing one another happens everywhere if you step back far enough. Let's not pretend you go out of your way to put a thermometer in your stove just to verify that water does in fact boil at 100C.
I'm not trusting AI blindly mind you. I'm trusting it because the conclusions and facts coming from it dont turn me into a oikophobic midwit who splurges his family's inheritence, cut his own dick off mid-process and blame everyone else while thinking himself righteous.
I never had enough suspension of disbelief to accept the premise of shows like Matrix because I just could not accept the possibility that humanity could be THIS FUCKING DUMB. But now I look forward to our machine overlord takeover and hope machines will pick up on my autism to let me live in 01: white clothes, barefeet in sterile laboratory/hospital setting and everything.
halucination happens anyway, constantly, it's why they have the little disclaimers about checking facts everywhere. at least there's a counter-balance to the wikipedos this way, though.
LLMs citing one another IS a bad thing. They're going to hallucinate in a circle and then retards will take it as gospel.
Though Grok is probably more accurate than wikipedia weirdos at this point.
Indeed. Is it a lack of god that causes people to take ai as truth above all else? Still searching for a supreme authority while mocking “sky daddy”.
I see what you mean. As a Christian I still use LLMs. I’d say they’re about as reliable as asking a stranger at a gas station. Sometimes they’ll give you a fresh perspective, but never take their output as gospel.
LLMs are a great tool if used properly. Combined with other tools they can drastically speed up some workflows.
So basically how Wikipedia works now except with humans?
Citing on another? You mean just like the cursed 14 articles that started this mess? AI is guilty of emulating humanity in most autistic manner possible. Be not afraid of looking at it, You're only seeing a honest reflection.
Citing one another happens everywhere if you step back far enough. Let's not pretend you go out of your way to put a thermometer in your stove just to verify that water does in fact boil at 100C.
I'm not trusting AI blindly mind you. I'm trusting it because the conclusions and facts coming from it dont turn me into a oikophobic midwit who splurges his family's inheritence, cut his own dick off mid-process and blame everyone else while thinking himself righteous.
I never had enough suspension of disbelief to accept the premise of shows like Matrix because I just could not accept the possibility that humanity could be THIS FUCKING DUMB. But now I look forward to our machine overlord takeover and hope machines will pick up on my autism to let me live in 01: white clothes, barefeet in sterile laboratory/hospital setting and everything.
halucination happens anyway, constantly, it's why they have the little disclaimers about checking facts everywhere. at least there's a counter-balance to the wikipedos this way, though.
To be fair, MSM has been doing the exact same thing for decades.