A few weeks ago: "regime change is bad" was updated to "regime change is good". This was a great success, so now new updates are being released.
Now, there is a new update: "must not be infringed" now means "if you're carrying a concealed gun at a protest, you are a domestic terrorist and will be summarily executed after being disarmed and restrained."
Please prepare for your next update, due to be released in a couple of months. In "We oppose Middle Eastern quagmires", strike the word 'oppose' and insert 'support'.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, and remember to keep trusting the plan.
It's not even a morally bad shooting. Dude instigated conflict, he had a gun, he resisted, and he was shot. High level view, nothing immoral.
Only thing that would make this morally bad is if we thought the officer purposely shot him out of malice. I don't see any evidence of that at all.
I think there's moral culpability in being so incompetent that six agents can't subdue one retard
Clearly you want them to be in the wrong for some reason, but there isn't actually any good reason to think that.
They should have done this, should have done that, should be perfect all the time. Like no, the dude is at fault. He brought the conflict, he resisted, he had a gun, he died.
Sans malice, there's nothing unreasonable about what happened.
Are you retarded? I'm not looking for them to be wrong. It's no different than women not being fit for field work as police officers. If you cannot do the job then you shouldnt take it. You seem to be struggling to grasp that it's not the shooting I have a problem with but the inability to do the basics of their job
Their job isn't to detain people like that guy. They're not state police that can arrest people for a litany of charges, they can only arrest for federal crimes.