FBI didn't 'release the footage', they showed part of it in a press conference.
Don't worry about what I believe, what you should worry is that your conclusions are based on false and nonsensical premises.
Why would the college release the footage? It makes no sense for them to do that.
Why would you have seen footage of it? The college doesn't want to advertise how easy it is walk onto campus, climb onto their roofs with a gun, assassinate somebody and then escape the scene.
Prosecutors never show their evidence to the public unless they are corrupt and trying to do politics.
The only way you'd have seen more of this footage is if somebody hacked into the college and stole it in the week or whatever that they store old camera footage or he happened to be in some random selfie video a student was taking and they realized it and shared it.
Like I said before, whether they did it or not they want to take credit for it but on the down low.
They want everybody saying 'don't cross Israel or you'll get palm-gun murdered in plain sight' but without any actual proof that could blow back on them.
Just 15 years ago any ONE of these would have been world shattering:
Which one of these is something other Administrations haven't done?
Other than the irrelevant details (ie others made WH look ugly in other ways, just not gold).
This is like a list of "yep he's an American President".
You can still get a mutant strain that's "covid" in name only and substantially different, but it doesn't sound like he even knows how people with natural immunity get "reinfected".
Vaccinated people, that's a different story. It seems they may even be reinfected with the same version, unmutated, because their immune system was tricked into thinking it's an allergen instead of an infection. Regardless their protection against mutant variants is much less.
I think normally they compare protein coding genes, not 'junk DNA' (which isn't really junk but whatever).
Doesn't matter if a gene is on chromosome 1 or 7 if it's the same gene, except for interbreeding.
But yeah it's all bullshit blank slate apologism. You can be a fully functional adult or a vegetable with just one base pair being wrong if it's certain ones.
Oh there's only a few million base pairs different between the races? That could be a little bit of difference or a fucking lot, it depends on what they are. And sure seems like some of them are fairly important.
That's why we say "they", could be one group or several acting together.
The point is somebody had the ability to plant evidence, but only exactly enough to make an impossible to believe story. Or they purposely made an impossible to believe story so you know they were forced to cover it up.
Just asking the question makes an already unlikely conspiracy theory even more unlikely. Why only exactly as much cover-up as to make an impossible to believe story?
Sure, those reasons are also part of covid - win-win for them. Point that you agree with is they were telling lies to accomplish their goal.
But here you think that goal was just to cover up a really incompetent mistake. So now we know a lot more about this conspiracy. They're super advance in planning and execution, made a really key mistake, didn't abort, then used their assets to plant a fake bullet, but were unable to plant a gun even though since the patsy didn't actually shoot and didn't have the gun with him they could put his DNA on any gun they wanted.
Simple!
China wanted Trump out, EU wanted him out, liberal Americans wanted him out. That's pretty much the globe.
Leaders of those groups don't care about actual people being harmed.
But do tell your more believable theory.
edit: also, do you remember how they announced the Warp Speed vaccines like literally two days after the election? Big Pharma who withheld that and investigative reporters who didn't break that news early were certainly doing it for the election.
A 30-06 not creating an exit wound when shot at a human neck is physically impossible. Winning the lottery isn't.
But that's exactly my point. "They" purposely told a story you believe is impossible so you're sure there's a cover-up. Why did they do that?
A nation-state level operation that smuggled an exploding lapel pin with high tech shaped charge designed to kill and look like a specific type of gun onto Kirk's shirt without him knowing or feeling the extra weight in coordination with their brainwashed patsy don't make mistakes, certainly not the kind like "uh, did anybody check the type of gun?"
It's one step too far for the theorists to explain why the masterminds wanted you to believe it's a conspiracy, but if it was a conspiracy and not a miracle they obviously planned to make it unbelievable to this target audience.
"I went out and bought ten lottery tickets and none of them won therefore nobody ever wins the lottery"
I watch this conspiracy porn for fun sometimes, but I've never seen them discuss why they believe the people orchestrating some complicated unknown scheme want people like this guy to believe it's a conspiracy.
"They" could have just claimed the patsy used a reasonable weapon so obviously it was part of the plan not just to take out Kirk but also to make guys like this sure it was a fake coverup. I think they know "...and they did it do drive a wedge between red-pill MAGA and trust-the-plan MAGA!1" is one step too far for their target audience.
Dude it's all weak shit.
- Guy had a rock in his shoe before he picked up the rifle? Must be a conspiracy!
- FBI didn't want a boring-ass press conference
- Guy wanted to clear his 'partner'
3 is particularly funny since I asked you if you were using AI to confirm your theories, which you didn't answer, and now you're posting 'Chat GPT says the texts are "most likely fabricated"' as evidence.
Save the videos, wait for the trial, find out you were wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz43uy0K8fY
Higher power rounds penetrate less distance. Normally they penetrate enough to exit, especially a neck, but that just means something abnormal happened this time.
There's 100 million insane liberals willing given the opportunity, hundreds of millions of guns. So that's nothing, there's probably ten crazy liberals at every event Kirk did. Text messages was shooter trying to get his trans boyfriend off the hook after shooter knew he was found out. The only thing hard but not impossible to explain is the bullet not exiting.
In other words it only takes you one unlikely fact to believe in conspiracies. Go read about the Birthday Paradox because unlikely events happen all the time when you have lots of events - like as in literally everything that happens every day. If that's all it takes you're going to see conspiracies all around you.
I do feel you on the government lying and covering up stuff. I feel like they're probably covering up the extent of this gay tranny discord network and their involvement. Probably to stop 'hate' crimes or a moral panic or save the Democrat party or some other dumb reason like to protect Discord investors or TLA ops using it or whatever. Hopefully they're quietly building a legal case, but doubtful.
lol what, if you don't have the evidence you shouldn't assume anything not the most convoluted explanation you can possibly imagine.
But regardless, I asked you what evidence and your evidence is a lack of evidence. Okay...
Yeah what evidence? Kirk is dead from a gunshot wound, somebody looking like the claimed shooter was on the roof with a gun.
What's the contrary evidence to that? He "couldn't" have shot Kirk because "reasons"? Ok well prove it couldn't have happened that way. Go ahead.
Well thanks for finally explaining your theory... turns out magic did it! A handgun with Hogwarts invisibility cloak over it so nobody in the crowd of thousands saw and it wasn't on video. A midget shot upwards from the stage trapdoor, but again there's zero evidence but that's okay because magic.
Or are you an adherent to the "squib theory" that Kirk is still alive lol.
Let me translate from Jumanji speak because she's had this idea many times in other cases.
What she's trying to say is that any result different from what it "should" be is proof of systemic discrimination. Kagan (I think?) even asked her directly in one of Katanji's first cases what the system discrimination was and she said, 'you know like the results aren't equitable so that's systemic discrimination'. You could hear the other justices roll their eyes.
I call this effect and cause thinking because these retard liberals seem to actually start from the effect.
Since blacks aren't 12% of representatives because winner-take-all isn't "equitable" that's proof of systemic discrimination from the government that must be fixed by making the voting system unfair to everybody else. That's what she's saying.