It is now proven almost beyond the shadow of a doubt that Charlie Kirk was not wearing any body armor. The attending sheriff, Erika Kirk, dozens of photographs showing the outline of his pectoral muscles and nipples, and front row witness statements all concur that he was just wearing a t-shirt.
The idea that he was wearing body armor was based on a few frames of Charlie's t-shirt jerking up, and a good faith attempt to make the FBI story make sense. But the most credible proponent of that theory, Paramount Tactical, admitted (before statements from Erika Kirk etc) that there was already a "90% chance Charlie wasn't wearing body armor."
For their part, Turning Point USA's version of the story, and the FBI's, do not mention body armor at all. The official version of the story is that the bullet didn't exit and was trapped under the skin of Charlie's back.
So what are we left with? The officially blamed weapon is a Mauser 98 firing a 30-06 round over less than 200 yards. A typical 30-06 round has a muzzle energy of 2,500-3,000 ft-lbs. That's enough to shoot through solid buckets of ice, cow bones, steel plate, and bear skulls. Conclusion: there is no way that a 30-06 round shot Charlie in the neck and did not exit.
The official story is provably false. So what really happened?
edit: Paramount also threw cold water on the idea of a frangible 30-06 round.
lol what, if you don't have the evidence you shouldn't assume anything not the most convoluted explanation you can possibly imagine.
But regardless, I asked you what evidence and your evidence is a lack of evidence. Okay...
Nice try but that's not how this works. The evidence is the rifle, the round, the "lack" of exit wound, the suspicious video and text messages, the old Jewish guy yelling that he was the killer after the shot was fired. After 9/11 and Vegas, I am going to assume a lot, because history has shown what these people will do to cover up their crimes. I don't believe some angsty gay guy from UVU did this.
There's 100 million insane liberals willing given the opportunity, hundreds of millions of guns. So that's nothing, there's probably ten crazy liberals at every event Kirk did. Text messages was shooter trying to get his trans boyfriend off the hook after shooter knew he was found out. The only thing hard but not impossible to explain is the bullet not exiting.
In other words it only takes you one unlikely fact to believe in conspiracies. Go read about the Birthday Paradox because unlikely events happen all the time when you have lots of events - like as in literally everything that happens every day. If that's all it takes you're going to see conspiracies all around you.
I do feel you on the government lying and covering up stuff. I feel like they're probably covering up the extent of this gay tranny discord network and their involvement. Probably to stop 'hate' crimes or a moral panic or save the Democrat party or some other dumb reason like to protect Discord investors or TLA ops using it or whatever. Hopefully they're quietly building a legal case, but doubtful.
It's based on a lot of inconsistencies, not just one. At some point, when you see your government do this again and again, you have to stop being stupid. You have to.