Early Scientists Who Proposed Africans/Aboriginals as Subspecies

---

1. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach

Key Work: De Generis Humani Varietate Nativa

Institutions: University of Göttingen (Germany)

Quote on brain structure:

• "The African skull, particularly the frontal lobe, is less developed than that of the Caucasian, which may account for the perceived differences in intellectual capacity and moral sensibility."

2. Carl Linnaeus

Key Work: Systema Naturae

Institutions: Lund University (Sweden), Uppsala University (Sweden)

Quote on skull structure:

• "The African race, with its dark skin, woolly hair, and prognathic jaws, exhibits a cranial structure that is markedly different from the European type, suggesting a distinct subspecies."

3. Louis Agassiz

Key Work: Essay on Classification

Institutions: Harvard University (USA), University of Neuchâtel (Switzerland)

Quote on racial hierarchy:

• "The Negro, with his flattened forehead and prominent facial features, is not merely a variety of the human species but a distinct and inferior subspecies, incapable of achieving the same intellectual heights as the Caucasian."

4. Samuel George Morton

Key Work: Crania Americana

Institutions: University of Pennsylvania (USA), Jefferson Medical College (USA)

Quote on brain size:

• "The average cranial capacity of the African is significantly smaller than that of the European, suggesting a fundamental difference in intellectual potential and placing them in a distinct subspecies category."

5. Charles Hamilton Smith

Key Work: The Natural History of the Human Species

Institutions: Royal Military Academy (UK)

Quote on skull structure:

• "The Australian Aboriginal, with his broad nose, thick lips, and prognathic jaw, exhibits a cranial structure that is markedly different from the European, indicating a distinct subspecies."

Science is the study of the world based on observable or unique differences. IQ statistics and global crime rates still correlate with this observable data today.

Cultural Marxists changed their definition of science and have the audacity to tell you to "Trust the Science" when it isn't observable and doesn't correlate with observable facts.

Your shitpost is shit. Try using a picture where the head is orientated properly and not tilted backwards which the ears alone are a dead giveaway of, and that's before bringing up the skin on the back of the neck.

This is RACIST and WRONG!😡

Chimpanzees and humans share 99% of their DNA but are considered a different species

That's almost the same percentage shared between all the different human races, yet all those races are considered the same human species.

Why is that? Seems somewhat contradictory and deliberate saying all the human races are the same species even though there are vast differences between them.