Why would you have seen footage of it? The college doesn't want to advertise how easy it is walk onto campus, climb onto their roofs with a gun, assassinate somebody and then escape the scene.
Prosecutors never show their evidence to the public unless they are corrupt and trying to do politics.
The only way you'd have seen more of this footage is if somebody hacked into the college and stole it in the week or whatever that they store old camera footage or he happened to be in some random selfie video a student was taking and they realized it and shared it.
The FBI released the cut roof footage. So unless they release the full length of it I'm assuming they're lying through their teeth. Because what we got shows exactly nothing.
If you want to trust the FBI and the justice system after all that has happened because you want to believe Tyler killed Charlie... be my guest. I'm going to trust my pattern recognition ability and will not ignore red flags.
FBI didn't 'release the footage', they showed part of it in a press conference.
Are you seriously trying to argue semantics now? When it doesn't even make sense? They showed it during a press conference. A public press conference. Which means the FBI released the footage to the public. And the TV networks showed that footage. Not screen recordings of that footage but the actual video footage itself.
Why would the college release the footage? It makes no sense for them to do that.
Really? I mean... really? We've been talking about what the FBI has and hasn't released and now you're trying to spin it that I'm saying the college should release the footage?
I listed out all the parties that could release "the footage" meaning all the parts you want to see. College wouldn't have released any of it, prosecutors wouldn't have released any of it, FBI would only release enough for PR to make themselves look competent (they shouldn't have shown any of it, but that's the FBI).
Why would you expect to have seen more of the footage? You think FBI is going to have a 10 hour press conference and go through all the evidence they've collected, or even just an extra 15 minutes of watching silent video? It's a crazy premise.
Why would you have seen footage of it? The college doesn't want to advertise how easy it is walk onto campus, climb onto their roofs with a gun, assassinate somebody and then escape the scene.
Prosecutors never show their evidence to the public unless they are corrupt and trying to do politics.
The only way you'd have seen more of this footage is if somebody hacked into the college and stole it in the week or whatever that they store old camera footage or he happened to be in some random selfie video a student was taking and they realized it and shared it.
The FBI released the cut roof footage. So unless they release the full length of it I'm assuming they're lying through their teeth. Because what we got shows exactly nothing.
If you want to trust the FBI and the justice system after all that has happened because you want to believe Tyler killed Charlie... be my guest. I'm going to trust my pattern recognition ability and will not ignore red flags.
FBI didn't 'release the footage', they showed part of it in a press conference.
Don't worry about what I believe, what you should worry is that your conclusions are based on false and nonsensical premises.
Why would the college release the footage? It makes no sense for them to do that.
Are you seriously trying to argue semantics now? When it doesn't even make sense? They showed it during a press conference. A public press conference. Which means the FBI released the footage to the public. And the TV networks showed that footage. Not screen recordings of that footage but the actual video footage itself.
Really? I mean... really? We've been talking about what the FBI has and hasn't released and now you're trying to spin it that I'm saying the college should release the footage?
I listed out all the parties that could release "the footage" meaning all the parts you want to see. College wouldn't have released any of it, prosecutors wouldn't have released any of it, FBI would only release enough for PR to make themselves look competent (they shouldn't have shown any of it, but that's the FBI).
Why would you expect to have seen more of the footage? You think FBI is going to have a 10 hour press conference and go through all the evidence they've collected, or even just an extra 15 minutes of watching silent video? It's a crazy premise.