Kirk was a charismatic, actual Christian
TP USA top guys were power-hungry grifters
Erika is a poser Christian
Robinson was a furry simp
Explains everything.
Erika with her Tammy Faye act and makeup is obviously faking the 'good Christian' role and lying to protect her image, TP lying to posture for power and hide 'misappropriations', the guy thought he was going to impress his trans friend that hated Kirk.
The mistake people are making is thinking they're all tied together other than Kirk. "They're all lying so it must be a grand conspiracy they're in on!" Like, no, they're just bugs scurrying around after their rock was removed.
CHIPS act was 2022 so that's three years where we've been funding semiconductor factories here ($280 billion), Trump's Krach was leaning on TMSC to come here back in 2019.
Both parties wanted it, it was going to happen, so definitely accounted for somehow. Seems reasonable that US going nuts on factories would disrupt the market.
Korea had like all their government records destroyed recently because they're so bad at datacenter so I doubt they're conspiring to make everything cloud.
More likely we're building a bunch of plants all the sudden because of CHIPS act and onshoring panic so there should be a glut of supply soon, so in anticipation Asia hasn't expanded production so in the meantime there's a crunch of all kinds of chip things.
You say you'd massively prefer a lone gay furry-lover, which is far far more likely and supported by evidence, but you still go with the "mob" of elite assassins that you can't even identify much less lay out a detailed theory of.
That's the definition of cope.
But I don't even blame you guys for wanting to believe these far-out theories, because the actual truth that there's 150 million insane liberals most of whom would murder you if they knew your beliefs and knew they could get away with it is terrifying.
You can see this fear in Crowder's Change My Mind he did afterwards; even behind bulletproof glass with a real security team he was visibly (and justifiably) shaking in fear. And everyone right of center feels this to some extent because Kirk was an everyman that nobody thought was under the gun.
It was some Mossad midget that popped up out of the trap door and shot him and that's why they confiscated the SD card to hide the evidence -- this is the easy answer because it lets you pretend that you're not surrounded every day by people who would do the same thing to you.
The world feels precarious and on a razor's edge if one person could do this. Almost anybody could be killed at almost any time.
Well that's how it is, and it's cowardly to pretend otherwise. One crazy liberal could sneak a long gun onto a roof in public past a security team. Easily.
The bullet is weird and should be explained, and could just be a one in a million thing, but everything else is not even a stretch. Crazy liberal wants to kill somebody because they're saying 'mean words'? Uh, yeah, where have you been the last ten years.
That's your opinion on what was implied by what was said and it's refuted by the person who said it.
In any case all of this comes from Nick - he's the only source for everything here. He's either telling the truth and it's a wrong implication or you're taking the word of a liar.
Sometimes liars tell the truth, but that's not really the strongest foundation is it.
There was a decent show called Coal (2011) with actual West Virginial coal miners mining coal.
It's impossible to find now probably because it showed poor white people working hard in a dangerous job just to get by which isn't convenient for their narrative of 'white privilege'. Also one-word title doesn't help.
Something I didn't even pick up on before is Piers is (of course) selectively editing the quote to make it sound like his dad didn't want to go to restaurants run by blacks, but later when he's defending his attack to make sure he's got it right reads "black fare".
So the anecdote was really saying his dad didn't want to go to KFC, even run by white employees, which jibes with Nick later saying his dad was just a food snob.
getting offended at his dad being named by Piers: I don't get it.
Nick explained it in the interview. It's hearsay. His dad isn't there to defend himself and only his dad can say what he meant. They don't bring the local gossip in to court to say "Nancy said this and meant that" they bring Nancy in.
Two, putting out his dad's name isn't really doxing him.
It's actually worse than doxing. The only reason for Piers to focus on the dad is to involve him, a private non-famous citizen, against his will against his son. Dad didn't choose to take on the 'not full-on doxing' risk and threats to himself, Piers did it to him and now he is a target of leftoids.
pay for terminal cancer treatments, but Nick is a millionaire at this point. He can't help his parents out?
Could be all kinds of reasons. Maybe they'll end up bankrupt and any money Nick sends won't actually help them but will go to Pfizer and UHC. Maybe they don't like Nick and won't accept his dirty money. Maybe his parents are jerks and Nick doesn't want to help them, but he's magnanimous and won't disparage them in public. Maybe he is helping them out.
Who knows and who cares?
That was my favorite part.
Piers was saying Nick was a denier because he said maybe it was a 'ridiculously' low number like 200k so Fuentes countered that he thought it was a ridiculously high number, obviously mocking Piers.
I think he went from 7 million or higher earlier to 100 times hoping that Piers would pick up on it and he could make the point that we can't say what's ridiculous without debate. But Piers...
Other favorite part was the ads funded by Daily Wire. Kind of on the nose.
Twitter shouldn't leave EU, but every time they get a bullshit fine raise prices on Europeans.
EU fines them $150 million, now blue checkmark costs $10 instead of $8 for Europeans. EU government account checkmark costs $1 million/mo instead of free.
Let Europe pay for their own fines.
Little follow-up on the Netflix story posted a few days ago:
Paramount will go straight to WBD shareholders with an all-cash, $30-per-share offer. ... The offer is backstopped with equity financing from the Ellison family and the private-equity firm RedBird Capital and $54 billion of debt commitments from Bank of America, Citi and Apollo Global Management.
"We're really here to finish what we started," Ellison told CNBC's "Squawk on the Street"
ie finish controlling the entire US media. Looks like blue-haired tranny Americans getting Warner Bros is the lesser of two evils.
after its plastic air induction elbow, bought at an air show in North America, collapsed
Air show was in USA. Was this written by AI or are BBC doing some weird newspeak?
Apparently the printed part was claimed by the seller to be made from plastic that melts at 220 F, which was higher than the official part at 180 F, but whoever printed it used the wrong plastic so it melted at 120 F. It also didn't have a metal insert to prevent collapse even if it did melt like the official part.
So 3d printing wasn't entirely the issue except you're trusting a rando individual instead of a business that has multiple customers and probably at least one employee involved that doesn't want to go to jail.
Not proof but there is evidence for it, namely being charged. Grand jury said he might be the guy. They only see one side of the evidence, but that side exists.
But I never said the FBI's case was proven, and neither did Fuentes. He said there's no proof in these conspiracy theories and there's not. He's right, Ian Carroll is wrong.
I feel like you guys' emotions are overcoming your ability to actually read and think critically. You guys haven't contradicted anything I said or Fuentes said but you're mighty angry about it.
She is the victim and she victimized herself.
Never a clearer example of how victim culture is negative, it doesn't build anything, it only ruins things.
She's got two felony charges and of course she'll get off most of the consequence because woman, her life is much worse today.
I think there was a bunch of megalomaniac televangelist types at the top of Turning Point that looked the other way or maybe had a hand in it, like the secret service at Trump's shooting.
Is that the official story?
That's supported by actual facts.
Ian Carroll is saying there's smoke so that's the same thing as fire. Fuentes is saying where's the fire. Fuentes is right.
That's why you have to say 'if you think anything else then you're a dumb-dumb' instead of actually showing proof.
It looks really suspicious to you, but that's all it is is your suspicions. If you don't have proof by now you won't ever.
Little doubt on who wants to be seen as the assassins. Jews want credit so that people are afraid to criticize Israel - whether they did it or not