Piers got demolished, but piers doesn’t care, Fuentes gives him clicks so he can keep eating while Britain disappears. Probably the biggest hit was when Fuentes called Piers a tabloid journalist, you could tell he was seething from that one.
Piers didn't get demolished exactly. He allowed Fuentes to make his point, he was somewhat cordial despite clearly hating Fuentes. Very British actually.
The audience that watches Piers had their beliefs confirmed and Fuentes did make his points well enough except for not being gay part.
The part where Fuentes asked, why is it to soon? was incredibly funny. I'm also glad Fuentes did get that monologue in uninterrupted about genocide. That was a point Piers did not engage or he would have lost. Clearly Piers set up the interview in an attempt to "de-radicalize" Fuentes viewers so any pushback against the idea of genocide would have lost any hope in reaching his goal audience.
It’s crazy how the subject Piers spent the most time on was Nick’s opinions on black crime, which is probably Nick’s most mainstream view at this point. Everybody is fucking tired of black crime.
What's crazy is that 15 years ago, discussing black crime (and all the bullshit around it) was so outside of the Overton window that it was only allowed on places like 4chan or chimpout dot com. Now, it's on nearly every mainstream social media app constantly. Imagine what else people will be allowed to be honest about in another generation.
I plan to watch the full thing in the evening when I get home, but it's pretty wild.
No matter who (if any) of these people you like, Piers is way out of his depth. He's getting destroyed, because he's looking weak trying to destroy Fuentes with clips and "gotchas."
Validity of arguments aside, just on competence, Piers can't keep up.
Piers thought the answer to "what percentage of whites are school shooters" was "2/3 of school shooters are white". I thought he embarrassed himself, but you never know how people will see this sort of thing. Probably the stuff that was cited will be disqualifying to a lot of normies.
Meanwhile, all of Fuentes' actually problematic views are left untouched - like him openly shilling for empire.
What was wild was that it was the same percentage of black school shooters and that would have nullified his initial argument that you should keep away from white people in school.
The point Fuentes made about staying away from black people was in relation to how disproportionate they commit crime in large cities. He even said he would rather offend an innocent black person then risk his life.
Speaking of London, I visited it for a couple of weeks almost a decade ago and one night we were out drinking at a pub and we left late. My manager who was born and raised in London told me that if I see a group of black guys just run and don't look back. He was not racist, he had friends of all ethnicities but it was just a fact that it was safer to run and risk being racist.
No matter who (if any) of these people you like, Piers is way out of his depth. He's getting destroyed, because he's looking weak trying to destroy Fuentes with clips and "gotchas."
Piers gets destroyed by anyone with half a braincell. He always looks like a complete idiot. Because he is a complete idiot.
No matter who (if any) of these people you like, Piers is way out of his depth.
This is a regular feature of his show. In fact he should probably retitle it "Out of My Depth with Piers Morgan" because it happens with Bassem Youssef, John Mearsheimer, Tucker, various conservatives every single time they come on, and he keeps having them back.
Piers is a different animal than anyone else in the MSM. He genuinely seems to like yakking for the sake of it, no matter how bad it makes him look.
He loses to anyone who stands up for themselves confidently, whether they're right or wrong. I don't hate Piers, but all he's got is milquetoast bullying and appeals to false virtue.
He got destroyed by Dan Bilzerian too, simply because Dan refused to back down or be cowed. You can win an argument with Piers by simply saying "Chad yes" or "nope, you're just wrong."
You ever wonder if this is deliberate? Like, he knows he's not allowed to say that stuff, but can have others come on to say it, and he loses the argument because he's not allowed to agree. I mean, he could go to prison for agreeing with people like Fuentes
It happens so consistently I think there's at least a possibility. He started with a standard Zionist position getting hammered every week on Gaza, but over time he's become more critical of Israel. Maybe that's because he had a change of heart, or maybe he needed the outward justification.
Piers pretending to not understand per capita makes this unwatchable. Maybe I'll skip ahead later but I suspect he keeps hammering home the same crap.
I got a good chuckle when he said he lives in London so he know what it's like to live in the ghettos that Nick was referring to. At most, his driver takes a wrong turn through a bad part of the city and Piers has to deal with looking at it for two minutes.
Was it streamed live or was it prerecorded? I heard Fuentes say last week that he was going to record the whole interview from his end to try to protect his own ass from bad faith editing.
I only heard Nick complaining last week that all these 9-5 interviews were killing him because he hasn't been awake at 9 am for an obligation since HS.
Piers got demolished, but piers doesn’t care, Fuentes gives him clicks so he can keep eating while Britain disappears. Probably the biggest hit was when Fuentes called Piers a tabloid journalist, you could tell he was seething from that one.
My favorite bit that I caught was "Too soon?" when Piers said you can't joke about the Holocaust.
Perfection, absolute perfection.
That's Nick's real strength; telling it like it is, and being willing to say it confidently and not get rattled.
My favorite so far is when Fuentes said heck it could be 100 times more than 6 million Jews.
His real strength is not underestimating the audience's intelligence.
https://x.com/themattmentzer/status/1998109580434588087
Piers didn't get demolished exactly. He allowed Fuentes to make his point, he was somewhat cordial despite clearly hating Fuentes. Very British actually.
The audience that watches Piers had their beliefs confirmed and Fuentes did make his points well enough except for not being gay part.
The part where Fuentes asked, why is it to soon? was incredibly funny. I'm also glad Fuentes did get that monologue in uninterrupted about genocide. That was a point Piers did not engage or he would have lost. Clearly Piers set up the interview in an attempt to "de-radicalize" Fuentes viewers so any pushback against the idea of genocide would have lost any hope in reaching his goal audience.
It’s crazy how the subject Piers spent the most time on was Nick’s opinions on black crime, which is probably Nick’s most mainstream view at this point. Everybody is fucking tired of black crime.
What's crazy is that 15 years ago, discussing black crime (and all the bullshit around it) was so outside of the Overton window that it was only allowed on places like 4chan or chimpout dot com. Now, it's on nearly every mainstream social media app constantly. Imagine what else people will be allowed to be honest about in another generation.
I plan to watch the full thing in the evening when I get home, but it's pretty wild.
No matter who (if any) of these people you like, Piers is way out of his depth. He's getting destroyed, because he's looking weak trying to destroy Fuentes with clips and "gotchas."
Validity of arguments aside, just on competence, Piers can't keep up.
Piers thought the answer to "what percentage of whites are school shooters" was "2/3 of school shooters are white". I thought he embarrassed himself, but you never know how people will see this sort of thing. Probably the stuff that was cited will be disqualifying to a lot of normies.
Meanwhile, all of Fuentes' actually problematic views are left untouched - like him openly shilling for empire.
What was wild was that it was the same percentage of black school shooters and that would have nullified his initial argument that you should keep away from white people in school.
The point Fuentes made about staying away from black people was in relation to how disproportionate they commit crime in large cities. He even said he would rather offend an innocent black person then risk his life.
Speaking of London, I visited it for a couple of weeks almost a decade ago and one night we were out drinking at a pub and we left late. My manager who was born and raised in London told me that if I see a group of black guys just run and don't look back. He was not racist, he had friends of all ethnicities but it was just a fact that it was safer to run and risk being racist.
Piers gets destroyed by anyone with half a braincell. He always looks like a complete idiot. Because he is a complete idiot.
Every six months or so of his non-stop yakking, Morgan actually says something mostly intelligent.
That puts him light years ahead of most of the MSM and quite a few Fox News hosts.
This is a regular feature of his show. In fact he should probably retitle it "Out of My Depth with Piers Morgan" because it happens with Bassem Youssef, John Mearsheimer, Tucker, various conservatives every single time they come on, and he keeps having them back.
Piers is a different animal than anyone else in the MSM. He genuinely seems to like yakking for the sake of it, no matter how bad it makes him look.
He loses to anyone who stands up for themselves confidently, whether they're right or wrong. I don't hate Piers, but all he's got is milquetoast bullying and appeals to false virtue.
He got destroyed by Dan Bilzerian too, simply because Dan refused to back down or be cowed. You can win an argument with Piers by simply saying "Chad yes" or "nope, you're just wrong."
You ever wonder if this is deliberate? Like, he knows he's not allowed to say that stuff, but can have others come on to say it, and he loses the argument because he's not allowed to agree. I mean, he could go to prison for agreeing with people like Fuentes
It happens so consistently I think there's at least a possibility. He started with a standard Zionist position getting hammered every week on Gaza, but over time he's become more critical of Israel. Maybe that's because he had a change of heart, or maybe he needed the outward justification.
Piers pretending to not understand per capita makes this unwatchable. Maybe I'll skip ahead later but I suspect he keeps hammering home the same crap.
I got a good chuckle when he said he lives in London so he know what it's like to live in the ghettos that Nick was referring to. At most, his driver takes a wrong turn through a bad part of the city and Piers has to deal with looking at it for two minutes.
Was it streamed live or was it prerecorded? I heard Fuentes say last week that he was going to record the whole interview from his end to try to protect his own ass from bad faith editing.
I only heard Nick complaining last week that all these 9-5 interviews were killing him because he hasn't been awake at 9 am for an obligation since HS.
No clue. It premiered live, and was tagged as "LIVE," but it could still go either way.
Nick W, boomers on suicide watch, my sides in orbit
That's how you know nick is controlled op. Why is he getting platformed all of a sudden?
Also, all the normies like Tim Pool are using Nick, who they used to despise, as tools to uphold the status quo. It's pretty insane.
Piers is another retarded journalist:
https://x.com/realpeteyb123/status/1998099257073754221
As expected Piers just interrupted him non stop :
https://x.com/digginginthedi1/status/1998206812861161892