I plan to watch the full thing in the evening when I get home, but it's pretty wild.
No matter who (if any) of these people you like, Piers is way out of his depth. He's getting destroyed, because he's looking weak trying to destroy Fuentes with clips and "gotchas."
Validity of arguments aside, just on competence, Piers can't keep up.
Piers thought the answer to "what percentage of whites are school shooters" was "2/3 of school shooters are white". I thought he embarrassed himself, but you never know how people will see this sort of thing. Probably the stuff that was cited will be disqualifying to a lot of normies.
Meanwhile, all of Fuentes' actually problematic views are left untouched - like him openly shilling for empire.
What was wild was that it was the same percentage of black school shooters and that would have nullified his initial argument that you should keep away from white people in school.
The point Fuentes made about staying away from black people was in relation to how disproportionate they commit crime in large cities. He even said he would rather offend an innocent black person then risk his life.
Speaking of London, I visited it for a couple of weeks almost a decade ago and one night we were out drinking at a pub and we left late. My manager who was born and raised in London told me that if I see a group of black guys just run and don't look back. He was not racist, he had friends of all ethnicities but it was just a fact that it was safer to run and risk being racist.
No matter who (if any) of these people you like, Piers is way out of his depth. He's getting destroyed, because he's looking weak trying to destroy Fuentes with clips and "gotchas."
Piers gets destroyed by anyone with half a braincell. He always looks like a complete idiot. Because he is a complete idiot.
No matter who (if any) of these people you like, Piers is way out of his depth.
This is a regular feature of his show. In fact he should probably retitle it "Out of My Depth with Piers Morgan" because it happens with Bassem Youssef, John Mearsheimer, Tucker, various conservatives every single time they come on, and he keeps having them back.
Piers is a different animal than anyone else in the MSM. He genuinely seems to like yakking for the sake of it, no matter how bad it makes him look.
He loses to anyone who stands up for themselves confidently, whether they're right or wrong. I don't hate Piers, but all he's got is milquetoast bullying and appeals to false virtue.
He got destroyed by Dan Bilzerian too, simply because Dan refused to back down or be cowed. You can win an argument with Piers by simply saying "Chad yes" or "nope, you're just wrong."
You ever wonder if this is deliberate? Like, he knows he's not allowed to say that stuff, but can have others come on to say it, and he loses the argument because he's not allowed to agree. I mean, he could go to prison for agreeing with people like Fuentes
It happens so consistently I think there's at least a possibility. He started with a standard Zionist position getting hammered every week on Gaza, but over time he's become more critical of Israel. Maybe that's because he had a change of heart, or maybe he needed the outward justification.
I plan to watch the full thing in the evening when I get home, but it's pretty wild.
No matter who (if any) of these people you like, Piers is way out of his depth. He's getting destroyed, because he's looking weak trying to destroy Fuentes with clips and "gotchas."
Validity of arguments aside, just on competence, Piers can't keep up.
Piers thought the answer to "what percentage of whites are school shooters" was "2/3 of school shooters are white". I thought he embarrassed himself, but you never know how people will see this sort of thing. Probably the stuff that was cited will be disqualifying to a lot of normies.
Meanwhile, all of Fuentes' actually problematic views are left untouched - like him openly shilling for empire.
What was wild was that it was the same percentage of black school shooters and that would have nullified his initial argument that you should keep away from white people in school.
The point Fuentes made about staying away from black people was in relation to how disproportionate they commit crime in large cities. He even said he would rather offend an innocent black person then risk his life.
Speaking of London, I visited it for a couple of weeks almost a decade ago and one night we were out drinking at a pub and we left late. My manager who was born and raised in London told me that if I see a group of black guys just run and don't look back. He was not racist, he had friends of all ethnicities but it was just a fact that it was safer to run and risk being racist.
Piers gets destroyed by anyone with half a braincell. He always looks like a complete idiot. Because he is a complete idiot.
Every six months or so of his non-stop yakking, Morgan actually says something mostly intelligent.
That puts him light years ahead of most of the MSM and quite a few Fox News hosts.
This is a regular feature of his show. In fact he should probably retitle it "Out of My Depth with Piers Morgan" because it happens with Bassem Youssef, John Mearsheimer, Tucker, various conservatives every single time they come on, and he keeps having them back.
Piers is a different animal than anyone else in the MSM. He genuinely seems to like yakking for the sake of it, no matter how bad it makes him look.
He loses to anyone who stands up for themselves confidently, whether they're right or wrong. I don't hate Piers, but all he's got is milquetoast bullying and appeals to false virtue.
He got destroyed by Dan Bilzerian too, simply because Dan refused to back down or be cowed. You can win an argument with Piers by simply saying "Chad yes" or "nope, you're just wrong."
You ever wonder if this is deliberate? Like, he knows he's not allowed to say that stuff, but can have others come on to say it, and he loses the argument because he's not allowed to agree. I mean, he could go to prison for agreeing with people like Fuentes
It happens so consistently I think there's at least a possibility. He started with a standard Zionist position getting hammered every week on Gaza, but over time he's become more critical of Israel. Maybe that's because he had a change of heart, or maybe he needed the outward justification.