No matter who (if any) of these people you like, Piers is way out of his depth.
This is a regular feature of his show. In fact he should probably retitle it "Out of My Depth with Piers Morgan" because it happens with Bassem Youssef, John Mearsheimer, Tucker, various conservatives every single time they come on, and he keeps having them back.
Piers is a different animal than anyone else in the MSM. He genuinely seems to like yakking for the sake of it, no matter how bad it makes him look.
He loses to anyone who stands up for themselves confidently, whether they're right or wrong. I don't hate Piers, but all he's got is milquetoast bullying and appeals to false virtue.
He got destroyed by Dan Bilzerian too, simply because Dan refused to back down or be cowed. You can win an argument with Piers by simply saying "Chad yes" or "nope, you're just wrong."
You ever wonder if this is deliberate? Like, he knows he's not allowed to say that stuff, but can have others come on to say it, and he loses the argument because he's not allowed to agree. I mean, he could go to prison for agreeing with people like Fuentes
It happens so consistently I think there's at least a possibility. He started with a standard Zionist position getting hammered every week on Gaza, but over time he's become more critical of Israel. Maybe that's because he had a change of heart, or maybe he needed the outward justification.
This is a regular feature of his show. In fact he should probably retitle it "Out of My Depth with Piers Morgan" because it happens with Bassem Youssef, John Mearsheimer, Tucker, various conservatives every single time they come on, and he keeps having them back.
Piers is a different animal than anyone else in the MSM. He genuinely seems to like yakking for the sake of it, no matter how bad it makes him look.
He loses to anyone who stands up for themselves confidently, whether they're right or wrong. I don't hate Piers, but all he's got is milquetoast bullying and appeals to false virtue.
He got destroyed by Dan Bilzerian too, simply because Dan refused to back down or be cowed. You can win an argument with Piers by simply saying "Chad yes" or "nope, you're just wrong."
You ever wonder if this is deliberate? Like, he knows he's not allowed to say that stuff, but can have others come on to say it, and he loses the argument because he's not allowed to agree. I mean, he could go to prison for agreeing with people like Fuentes
It happens so consistently I think there's at least a possibility. He started with a standard Zionist position getting hammered every week on Gaza, but over time he's become more critical of Israel. Maybe that's because he had a change of heart, or maybe he needed the outward justification.