"Jew hate" is a relatively recently popularized term, it seems to me. And I'm not sure Charlie used the phrase "brainrot."
It just feels fake. Her obvious acting aside, I don't even believe her claims either. I don't think Charlie said those things, at least in those words. He did feel similarly, and had condemned antisemitism, but this phrasing is a lie and an op.
She is acting. And she's terrible at it. That clip is obviously rehearsed. Does it prove anything? No. But it definitely should make you suspicious considering all the inconsistencies in the official story.
You should always be suspicious of the 'official story'.
It doesn't take extraordinary evidence to suspect governments, particularly the government of Operation Northwoods fame. But I do ask for extraordinary evidence for claims that a woman was involved and/or had preknowledge of the murder of her husband and the father of her children, and I haven't even gotten ordinary evidence.
If the love of my life was murdered in front of a live audience, and I was then accused of being involved, my behavior might also seem strange to random commenters online. This ain't rocket science.
You know that when Kyle Rittenhouse showed his trauma in the courtroom, everyone on the left accused him of "fake crying" with no evidence? I thought the right was better. Turns out, the right is as bad but just directs its fire at its own.
If the love of my life was murdered in front of a live audience, and I was then accused of being involved, my behavior might also seem strange to random commenters online. This ain't rocket science.
"Please don't investigate my husband's death" and cancelling his company-wide audit is a really weird grief response. Lying about his text messages is also weird. TPUSA reporters suddenly cheering on war is pretty weird too!
This is just a reskinned version of the believe all women discussion where literally no behavior could call rape accusers into question because "everyone responds differently."
Let's be real, this isn't about any investigation, but about the rampage Candace Owens has been on - accusing everyone in Charlie's orbit of betraying him and being complicit in his murder.
This is just a reskinned version of the believe all women discussion where literally no behavior could call rape accusers into question because "everyone responds differently."
Big difference is that rape accusers have an accusations they're trying to prove, while in this case, people are claiming that this poor woman was complicit in her husband's murder. If you can successfully cast some doubt on a rape accuser, that will bring the claim beneath the 'reasonable doubt' threshold. But you need gigantic amounts of proof for this nefarious business.
Let's be real, this isn't about any investigation, but about the rampage Candace Owens has been on - accusing everyone in Charlie's orbit of betraying him and being complicit in his murder.
Well, the accused have acted in the guiltiest way possible, so as tilted as Candace gets I think her questions deserve some answers. I don't know if they were plotting murder - but they're covering up something.
Big difference is that rape accusers have an accusations they're trying to prove, while in this case, people are claiming that this poor woman was complicit in her husband's murder. If you can successfully cast some doubt on a rape accuser, that will bring the claim beneath the 'reasonable doubt' threshold. But you need gigantic amounts of proof for this nefarious business.
There's a ton of reasonable doubt to be had here. The FBI is obviously trying to pull the wool over the public's eyes for some reason. TPUSA is doing their best to help with their claims of superman necks and nonexistent 911 calls. Who's the new CEO of TPUSA? Erika. How long did it take for her to be appointed? A couple days?
If she wasn't running a multimillion dollar company that directly profited from Charlie's death and reversed course from Charlie's most important views in life, I'd never question her. But... she is.
Spouses aren't sacred untouchable territory for investigations.
Well, the accused have acted in the guiltiest way possible
What's acting guilty? I don't think I can judge that. If the love of your life was murdered and then people started accusing you of being the killer, I'm pretty sure you'd act pretty strange too in ways people may call 'acting guilty'.
There's a ton of reasonable doubt to be had here. The FBI is obviously trying to pull the wool over the public's eyes for some reason. TPUSA is doing their best to help with their claims of superman necks and nonexistent 911 calls. Who's the new CEO of TPUSA? Erika. How long did it take for her to be appointed? A couple days?
My point was that there is a much higher evidentiary bar when the burden of proof is with you than when it goes against you. The burden of proof is with the accuser, which is why it's easier to disprove (sufficiently) an accusation than it is to prove involvement in a murder.
She 100% was complicit, but the "blame Israel" cuck army is leading the discussion away from the truth.
We know she's fucking Vance. We know natalism failed in their efforts to cement their unwanted cult as dictators of America. We know that Kirk's death was immediately used to shill natalism.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that Vance and Erika Kirk planned the assassination together to prop up the absolutely dismal level of support for their pathetic natalism drive. Trump is a passenger in his own government.
You know that when Kyle Rittenhouse showed his trauma in the courtroom, everyone on the left accused him of "fake crying" with no evidence?
Kyle was accused of that by political activists who wanted to lynch him for racial reasons even though it was a clear cut case of self defense. His breaking down in the court room and getting overwhelmed by the memories of what had happened is a natural reaction. It wasn't in any way weird or strange.
That is not comparable to this situation.
If the love of my life was murdered in front of a live audience, and I was then accused of being involved, my behavior might also seem strange to random commenters online. This ain't rocket science.
Her behavior was strange before anyone accused her of anything. For example she uploaded a very creepy closeup video of her kissing her dead husbands hands.
You cannot tell me that her behavior in that interview seems genuine to you. There is absolutely no way she's talking from the heart. Obviously that doesn't have to mean anything but it is very fucking weird and that she wants people to stop asking questions makes it even weirder.
Kyle was accused of that by political activists who wanted to lynch him for racial reasons even though it was a clear cut case of self defense. His breaking down in the court room and getting overwhelmed by the memories of what had happened is a natural reaction. It wasn't in any way weird or strange.
And now Erika Kirk has been accused of all sorts of things after her husband was just murdered. Putting a lot of pressure on her and then claiming victory when that pressure leads to her acting in ways they find weird.
That is not comparable to this situation.
It's not the same, but it's most definitely comparable.
Her behavior was strange before anyone accused her of anything. For example she uploaded a very creepy closeup video of her kissing her dead husbands hands.
I've seen people deal more weirdly with deaths that were much more natural and at a more normal age than this.
You cannot tell me that her behavior in that interview seems genuine to you. There is absolutely no way she's talking from the heart. Obviously that doesn't have to mean anything but it is very fucking weird and that she wants people to stop asking questions makes it even weirder.
She wants Candace Owens to stop flinging crap at everyone and everything. That's all. I'm not going to stop "asking questions". I'm not going to imply that a grieving widow was involved in the murder of the father of her children tho.
And now Erika Kirk has been accused of all sorts of things after her husband was just murdered. Putting a lot of pressure on her and then claiming victory when that pressure leads to her acting in ways they find weird.
Like I already stated she behaved weird long before anyone accused her of anything.
It's not the same, but it's most definitely comparable.
Sure, you can compare anything to anything if you feel like it.
I'm not going to imply that a grieving widow was involved in the murder of the father of her children tho.
Never suggested you should. I can think of plenty of other explanations for her disingenuous behavior.
Like I already stated she behaved weird long before anyone accused her of anything.
In a way that you find weird. Shove a camera in my face or your face, and I'm pretty sure people will judge us as "weird" too, eh?
Never suggested you should. I can think of plenty of other explanations for her disingenuous behavior.
I don't think the most likely suspect is Israel, but if it were, then I can imagine that she could be threatened. That would still be no reason to attack her though.
The most important take-away from Charlie Kirk's assassination is that Israel is our greatest ally and that our country was founded on Judeo-Christian values.
it is 100% reasonable for a recent widow due to political violence to be very upset by a political mass murder event. I imagine it would dredge up terrible memories.
I would contest the descriptor "very upset" since in this same clip, she's able to stanch her (unobservable) tears and produce a creepy smile on command.
Her response goes from sorrow to anger to awe to appeal... all in one minute. It would be remarkable for someone to genuinely shift to all those emotions even across the span of a conversation. It's scripted.
"Leftist Jews are responsibly for many of our societal ills."
"Israel was likely complicit in October 7th."
"Jewish billionaires have massive undue influence."
"Israel is going to kill me." (Allegedly on this one.)
"These Jews are matching every stereotype."
He was provably moving further away from Zionism, in a big way. And he was being called a Nazi and antisemite by various Jewish interest groups for years.
EDIT: Oh, yeah, and they hated him for platforming "antisemite of the year nominee" Tucker Carlson, and major (and highly effective) Israel critic Dave Smith. Dave destroyed Josh Hammer, and that victory was handed to him on a plate by Charlie, in front of a live TPUSA crowd.
It's funny how easily odious characters like Ben Domenech and Erik Erickson whitewashed their record.
Ben Domenech, a co-founder of The Federalist, wrote, “If Charlie Kirk remains the head of TPUSA, the right has an anti-Semite problem that will follow them into the coming elections.” src
This filthy creature and wife to Megan McCain said this before the 2024 election.
Erik Erickson: At this point. @tpusa is looking like not just a grifting operation, but an anti-Semitic grifting operation. src
The New York Times was also doing the same thing over completely innocuous commnets.
Not that Mr. Kirk has stopped his antisemitic comments. In April, he went on a rant on his show saying that Jews deny they are white and foment anti-white prejudice.
“White means you, too,” he said, addressing Jewish Americans. “Welcome to the most hated class in America today.” src
UCLA has engaged in blatant racial discrimination in admissions for both undergraduate and medical school admissions. It also allowed radicals to create an exclusion zone for Jewish students during pro-Palestine demonstrations in 2024.
Their entire movement is hitching their wagons to Israel because Trump will be gone soon and the rest of the base is suspicious of Jews. Even the normies.
I don't think anything. But people deal with grief in different and sometimes - to the uninitiated - strange ways. And I'm not going to micro-examine a widow for evidence of God-knows-what.
Well, good thing she's on a weeklong Leave Me Alone publicity tour then. Why anyone would examine her behavior across multiple cable interviews and a special sitdown with an Israeli propagandist, I have no idea.
I mean, it's not as if people were leaving her alone before. Candace Owens said that she'd stop if Erika told her to stop, and then she didn't. BTW, I think some of the questions, including by Owens, were completely legitimate, but she has gone completely off the deep end.
Not a single one of Candace's questions has been answered, whether you consider them legitimate or not. She has good reason to believe there is a coverup going on and TPUSA is involved. I don't fault her for continuing to investigate.
Well shit. It's a shock that after 3 months of having shit flung at her that she is now sick of it. Also Charlie was a zionist up until shortly before his death. Are you shocked that a woman has similar views as her husband
Are you sure she has similar views as her husband? 2025 Charlie was openly speculating that Netanyahu left the border open on October 7th and calling out Jewish donors on his show. If Erika expresses any of that anti-Israel sentiment, she gets more credibility in my eyes. But that seems very unlikely.
Yeah and Charlie didn't start that until recently. Women adopt the views of their husbands and other males in their life. Also Candace is claiming they buried the hatchet
Kirk was a charismatic, actual Christian
TP USA top guys were power-hungry grifters
Erika is a poser Christian
Robinson was a furry simp
Explains everything.
Erika with her Tammy Faye act and makeup is obviously faking the 'good Christian' role and lying to protect her image, TP lying to posture for power and hide 'misappropriations', the guy thought he was going to impress his trans friend that hated Kirk.
The mistake people are making is thinking they're all tied together other than Kirk. "They're all lying so it must be a grand conspiracy they're in on!" Like, no, they're just bugs scurrying around after their rock was removed.
Grief has no defined path so the claim someone is acting "weird" is speculative at best. Compared to what? What's the normal way to act as a new a single Mother to 2 young Kids after watching their Father get killed live on TV whilst trying to take up the mantle of his work at the same time? Being an internet autist really has downsides when it comes to reading human emotion.
Obviously everyone around her is swooping on her and pissing in her ear. I think it's far more likely she's not in a position to realise the people whispering in her ear are not friendly advisors.
Being an internet autist really has downsides when it comes to reading human emotion.
I actually think I'm firmly in the non-autistic camp on this one and a lot of you just aren't good at reading cues of superficiality.
Obviously everyone around her is swooping on her and pissing in her ear. I think it's far more likely she's not in a position to realise the people whispering in her ear are not friendly advisors.
So why is she the president of a $150M organization if she's such a babe in the woods? Doesn't make any sense bro. Who thought it was a good idea for her to instantly replace Charlie? What was their reasoning? Why did she accept?
You seriously don't think anyone else was equipped to run TPUSA? They have other leaders there, it's a $150M business. Erika wasn't even really a public figure before this.
This dumb bitch hit paydirt the second that bullet ripped through her husband's neck, and you can see it on her face she knows it. Grifters grift, it's all they know
"Jew hate" is a relatively recently popularized term, it seems to me. And I'm not sure Charlie used the phrase "brainrot."
It just feels fake. Her obvious acting aside, I don't even believe her claims either. I don't think Charlie said those things, at least in those words. He did feel similarly, and had condemned antisemitism, but this phrasing is a lie and an op.
She knew and is acting.
Come on.
She is acting. And she's terrible at it. That clip is obviously rehearsed. Does it prove anything? No. But it definitely should make you suspicious considering all the inconsistencies in the official story.
You should always be suspicious of the 'official story'.
It doesn't take extraordinary evidence to suspect governments, particularly the government of Operation Northwoods fame. But I do ask for extraordinary evidence for claims that a woman was involved and/or had preknowledge of the murder of her husband and the father of her children, and I haven't even gotten ordinary evidence.
If the love of my life was murdered in front of a live audience, and I was then accused of being involved, my behavior might also seem strange to random commenters online. This ain't rocket science.
You know that when Kyle Rittenhouse showed his trauma in the courtroom, everyone on the left accused him of "fake crying" with no evidence? I thought the right was better. Turns out, the right is as bad but just directs its fire at its own.
"Please don't investigate my husband's death" and cancelling his company-wide audit is a really weird grief response. Lying about his text messages is also weird. TPUSA reporters suddenly cheering on war is pretty weird too!
This is just a reskinned version of the believe all women discussion where literally no behavior could call rape accusers into question because "everyone responds differently."
Let's be real, this isn't about any investigation, but about the rampage Candace Owens has been on - accusing everyone in Charlie's orbit of betraying him and being complicit in his murder.
Big difference is that rape accusers have an accusations they're trying to prove, while in this case, people are claiming that this poor woman was complicit in her husband's murder. If you can successfully cast some doubt on a rape accuser, that will bring the claim beneath the 'reasonable doubt' threshold. But you need gigantic amounts of proof for this nefarious business.
Well, the accused have acted in the guiltiest way possible, so as tilted as Candace gets I think her questions deserve some answers. I don't know if they were plotting murder - but they're covering up something.
There's a ton of reasonable doubt to be had here. The FBI is obviously trying to pull the wool over the public's eyes for some reason. TPUSA is doing their best to help with their claims of superman necks and nonexistent 911 calls. Who's the new CEO of TPUSA? Erika. How long did it take for her to be appointed? A couple days?
If she wasn't running a multimillion dollar company that directly profited from Charlie's death and reversed course from Charlie's most important views in life, I'd never question her. But... she is.
Spouses aren't sacred untouchable territory for investigations.
What's acting guilty? I don't think I can judge that. If the love of your life was murdered and then people started accusing you of being the killer, I'm pretty sure you'd act pretty strange too in ways people may call 'acting guilty'.
My point was that there is a much higher evidentiary bar when the burden of proof is with you than when it goes against you. The burden of proof is with the accuser, which is why it's easier to disprove (sufficiently) an accusation than it is to prove involvement in a murder.
She 100% was complicit, but the "blame Israel" cuck army is leading the discussion away from the truth.
We know she's fucking Vance. We know natalism failed in their efforts to cement their unwanted cult as dictators of America. We know that Kirk's death was immediately used to shill natalism.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out that Vance and Erika Kirk planned the assassination together to prop up the absolutely dismal level of support for their pathetic natalism drive. Trump is a passenger in his own government.
Eat lead.
Absolutely brilliant. Keep at it.
Kyle was accused of that by political activists who wanted to lynch him for racial reasons even though it was a clear cut case of self defense. His breaking down in the court room and getting overwhelmed by the memories of what had happened is a natural reaction. It wasn't in any way weird or strange.
That is not comparable to this situation.
Her behavior was strange before anyone accused her of anything. For example she uploaded a very creepy closeup video of her kissing her dead husbands hands.
You cannot tell me that her behavior in that interview seems genuine to you. There is absolutely no way she's talking from the heart. Obviously that doesn't have to mean anything but it is very fucking weird and that she wants people to stop asking questions makes it even weirder.
Rittenhouse was also facing the very real possibility of being locked away forever to sate the bloodlust of the BLM chimps.
A year after being in the custody of the State for long periods.
And sitting across from fink faggot corrupt prosecutors that literally argued "Everyone has to take a beating sometime".
And now Erika Kirk has been accused of all sorts of things after her husband was just murdered. Putting a lot of pressure on her and then claiming victory when that pressure leads to her acting in ways they find weird.
It's not the same, but it's most definitely comparable.
I've seen people deal more weirdly with deaths that were much more natural and at a more normal age than this.
She wants Candace Owens to stop flinging crap at everyone and everything. That's all. I'm not going to stop "asking questions". I'm not going to imply that a grieving widow was involved in the murder of the father of her children tho.
Like I already stated she behaved weird long before anyone accused her of anything.
Sure, you can compare anything to anything if you feel like it.
Never suggested you should. I can think of plenty of other explanations for her disingenuous behavior.
In a way that you find weird. Shove a camera in my face or your face, and I'm pretty sure people will judge us as "weird" too, eh?
I don't think the most likely suspect is Israel, but if it were, then I can imagine that she could be threatened. That would still be no reason to attack her though.
Such as? And by whom?
She is also being accused by political activists
Also, lying.
The most important take-away from Charlie Kirk's assassination is that Israel is our greatest ally and that our country was founded on Judeo-Christian values.
And natalists are willing to kill their own advocates to promote their shitty, unwanted breeding cult. Don't forget that.
Weird Imp conclusion.
It's the most logical conclusion.
The Nazi faggots can be dismissed immediately, the official story is glaringly fake and there's no other known motives.
it is 100% reasonable for a recent widow due to political violence to be very upset by a political mass murder event. I imagine it would dredge up terrible memories.
this rant definitely feels forced though.
I would contest the descriptor "very upset" since in this same clip, she's able to stanch her (unobservable) tears and produce a creepy smile on command.
Her response goes from sorrow to anger to awe to appeal... all in one minute. It would be remarkable for someone to genuinely shift to all those emotions even across the span of a conversation. It's scripted.
If she was so upset she probably wouldn't be dolling herself up, caked in make up and gold rings, and pretend to cry about it constantly on TV.
that's hollywood. if you go on tv, you get dressed up and made up per the producer's requirements
Exactly. Its hollygay and she's willingly playing her part.
Charlie was part of the propaganda operation. He was a wall kissing zionist.
Charlie, paraphrased:
"Jewish donors are pressuring me."
"Leftist Jews are responsibly for many of our societal ills."
"Israel was likely complicit in October 7th."
"Jewish billionaires have massive undue influence."
"Israel is going to kill me." (Allegedly on this one.)
"These Jews are matching every stereotype."
He was provably moving further away from Zionism, in a big way. And he was being called a Nazi and antisemite by various Jewish interest groups for years.
EDIT: Oh, yeah, and they hated him for platforming "antisemite of the year nominee" Tucker Carlson, and major (and highly effective) Israel critic Dave Smith. Dave destroyed Josh Hammer, and that victory was handed to him on a plate by Charlie, in front of a live TPUSA crowd.
It's funny how easily odious characters like Ben Domenech and Erik Erickson whitewashed their record.
This filthy creature and wife to Megan McCain said this before the 2024 election.
The New York Times was also doing the same thing over completely innocuous commnets.
Never forget and never let them forget.
https://xcancel.com/charliekirk11/status/1949908699411288130#m
https://xcancel.com/charliekirk11/status/1951400325593575853#m
Such antisemitism. Much hatred.
We have no firsthand proof of any of those statements.
We have proof of all of them but the rumor...
Why did every talking head immediately have their quotes ready for "Charlie supported family and marriage" after the cuck was shot?
Most obvious sign of a psy-op is when everyone moves on lockstep to the same place.
Why did MGTOW choose a Nazi to be moderator instead of you? The humiliation was so great you rage quit lol lmao even
Well considering all his comments are negative everywhere might be an indicator.
Alot of these people do not care about the truth. They like being outraged more than facts
and he was killed shortly after he started going off script.
It's just fucking Israel, Israel, Israel with her now.
I don't know how they did it yet, but you can reverse engineer from all this exact who she works for and who profited most off Charlie's death.
Their entire movement is hitching their wagons to Israel because Trump will be gone soon and the rest of the base is suspicious of Jews. Even the normies.
No, that's just called "being a Christian". And what was she responding to? F that propagandist Bari Weiss for putting a widow in this position.
Really? Do you see the jarring switch in emotions starting at 45 seconds? You think that smile is legitimate?
I don't think anything. But people deal with grief in different and sometimes - to the uninitiated - strange ways. And I'm not going to micro-examine a widow for evidence of God-knows-what.
Well, good thing she's on a weeklong Leave Me Alone publicity tour then. Why anyone would examine her behavior across multiple cable interviews and a special sitdown with an Israeli propagandist, I have no idea.
I mean, it's not as if people were leaving her alone before. Candace Owens said that she'd stop if Erika told her to stop, and then she didn't. BTW, I think some of the questions, including by Owens, were completely legitimate, but she has gone completely off the deep end.
Not a single one of Candace's questions has been answered, whether you consider them legitimate or not. She has good reason to believe there is a coverup going on and TPUSA is involved. I don't fault her for continuing to investigate.
Investigating is good, but chasing wild tales and breathlessly presenting them as established fact is not.
Sometimes Candace does this. It's a mixed bag. But overall she is the only one with a national platform that's asking questions at all.
Well shit. It's a shock that after 3 months of having shit flung at her that she is now sick of it. Also Charlie was a zionist up until shortly before his death. Are you shocked that a woman has similar views as her husband
Are you sure she has similar views as her husband? 2025 Charlie was openly speculating that Netanyahu left the border open on October 7th and calling out Jewish donors on his show. If Erika expresses any of that anti-Israel sentiment, she gets more credibility in my eyes. But that seems very unlikely.
Yeah and Charlie didn't start that until recently. Women adopt the views of their husbands and other males in their life. Also Candace is claiming they buried the hatchet
They were supposedly a really tight couple, right? A year is more than enough time for her to cotton to some of his views.
tips yarmulke
Go away, yid.
Kirk was a charismatic, actual Christian
TP USA top guys were power-hungry grifters
Erika is a poser Christian
Robinson was a furry simp
Explains everything.
Erika with her Tammy Faye act and makeup is obviously faking the 'good Christian' role and lying to protect her image, TP lying to posture for power and hide 'misappropriations', the guy thought he was going to impress his trans friend that hated Kirk.
The mistake people are making is thinking they're all tied together other than Kirk. "They're all lying so it must be a grand conspiracy they're in on!" Like, no, they're just bugs scurrying around after their rock was removed.
The funniest thing with this clip is that I genuinely can't tell if she's an asset or simply an Evangelical.
Grief has no defined path so the claim someone is acting "weird" is speculative at best. Compared to what? What's the normal way to act as a new a single Mother to 2 young Kids after watching their Father get killed live on TV whilst trying to take up the mantle of his work at the same time? Being an internet autist really has downsides when it comes to reading human emotion.
Obviously everyone around her is swooping on her and pissing in her ear. I think it's far more likely she's not in a position to realise the people whispering in her ear are not friendly advisors.
I actually think I'm firmly in the non-autistic camp on this one and a lot of you just aren't good at reading cues of superficiality.
So why is she the president of a $150M organization if she's such a babe in the woods? Doesn't make any sense bro. Who thought it was a good idea for her to instantly replace Charlie? What was their reasoning? Why did she accept?
Who else would take it over?
You seriously don't think anyone else was equipped to run TPUSA? They have other leaders there, it's a $150M business. Erika wasn't even really a public figure before this.
This dumb bitch hit paydirt the second that bullet ripped through her husband's neck, and you can see it on her face she knows it. Grifters grift, it's all they know
Erika Kirk knows what she's doing here.
Heat off the people it needs to be on, by being "caught" supporting Israel.
If the Democrats want to win, they should run on stringing up the members of Project 2025.
Kirk was the retard martyr of the failed natalist movement.
Nothing you say ever matters. Post a pic of your noose, zippertits. 41% already.
Freudian slip?
Oh. Definitely.