She is acting. And she's terrible at it. That clip is obviously rehearsed. Does it prove anything? No. But it definitely should make you suspicious considering all the inconsistencies in the official story.
You should always be suspicious of the 'official story'.
It doesn't take extraordinary evidence to suspect governments, particularly the government of Operation Northwoods fame. But I do ask for extraordinary evidence for claims that a woman was involved and/or had preknowledge of the murder of her husband and the father of her children, and I haven't even gotten ordinary evidence.
If the love of my life was murdered in front of a live audience, and I was then accused of being involved, my behavior might also seem strange to random commenters online. This ain't rocket science.
You know that when Kyle Rittenhouse showed his trauma in the courtroom, everyone on the left accused him of "fake crying" with no evidence? I thought the right was better. Turns out, the right is as bad but just directs its fire at its own.
If the love of my life was murdered in front of a live audience, and I was then accused of being involved, my behavior might also seem strange to random commenters online. This ain't rocket science.
"Please don't investigate my husband's death" and cancelling his company-wide audit is a really weird grief response. Lying about his text messages is also weird. TPUSA reporters suddenly cheering on war is pretty weird too!
This is just a reskinned version of the believe all women discussion where literally no behavior could call rape accusers into question because "everyone responds differently."
Let's be real, this isn't about any investigation, but about the rampage Candace Owens has been on - accusing everyone in Charlie's orbit of betraying him and being complicit in his murder.
This is just a reskinned version of the believe all women discussion where literally no behavior could call rape accusers into question because "everyone responds differently."
Big difference is that rape accusers have an accusations they're trying to prove, while in this case, people are claiming that this poor woman was complicit in her husband's murder. If you can successfully cast some doubt on a rape accuser, that will bring the claim beneath the 'reasonable doubt' threshold. But you need gigantic amounts of proof for this nefarious business.
You know that when Kyle Rittenhouse showed his trauma in the courtroom, everyone on the left accused him of "fake crying" with no evidence?
Kyle was accused of that by political activists who wanted to lynch him for racial reasons even though it was a clear cut case of self defense. His breaking down in the court room and getting overwhelmed by the memories of what had happened is a natural reaction. It wasn't in any way weird or strange.
That is not comparable to this situation.
If the love of my life was murdered in front of a live audience, and I was then accused of being involved, my behavior might also seem strange to random commenters online. This ain't rocket science.
Her behavior was strange before anyone accused her of anything. For example she uploaded a very creepy closeup video of her kissing her dead husbands hands.
You cannot tell me that her behavior in that interview seems genuine to you. There is absolutely no way she's talking from the heart. Obviously that doesn't have to mean anything but it is very fucking weird and that she wants people to stop asking questions makes it even weirder.
Kyle was accused of that by political activists who wanted to lynch him for racial reasons even though it was a clear cut case of self defense. His breaking down in the court room and getting overwhelmed by the memories of what had happened is a natural reaction. It wasn't in any way weird or strange.
And now Erika Kirk has been accused of all sorts of things after her husband was just murdered. Putting a lot of pressure on her and then claiming victory when that pressure leads to her acting in ways they find weird.
That is not comparable to this situation.
It's not the same, but it's most definitely comparable.
Her behavior was strange before anyone accused her of anything. For example she uploaded a very creepy closeup video of her kissing her dead husbands hands.
I've seen people deal more weirdly with deaths that were much more natural and at a more normal age than this.
You cannot tell me that her behavior in that interview seems genuine to you. There is absolutely no way she's talking from the heart. Obviously that doesn't have to mean anything but it is very fucking weird and that she wants people to stop asking questions makes it even weirder.
She wants Candace Owens to stop flinging crap at everyone and everything. That's all. I'm not going to stop "asking questions". I'm not going to imply that a grieving widow was involved in the murder of the father of her children tho.
Come on.
She is acting. And she's terrible at it. That clip is obviously rehearsed. Does it prove anything? No. But it definitely should make you suspicious considering all the inconsistencies in the official story.
You should always be suspicious of the 'official story'.
It doesn't take extraordinary evidence to suspect governments, particularly the government of Operation Northwoods fame. But I do ask for extraordinary evidence for claims that a woman was involved and/or had preknowledge of the murder of her husband and the father of her children, and I haven't even gotten ordinary evidence.
If the love of my life was murdered in front of a live audience, and I was then accused of being involved, my behavior might also seem strange to random commenters online. This ain't rocket science.
You know that when Kyle Rittenhouse showed his trauma in the courtroom, everyone on the left accused him of "fake crying" with no evidence? I thought the right was better. Turns out, the right is as bad but just directs its fire at its own.
"Please don't investigate my husband's death" and cancelling his company-wide audit is a really weird grief response. Lying about his text messages is also weird. TPUSA reporters suddenly cheering on war is pretty weird too!
This is just a reskinned version of the believe all women discussion where literally no behavior could call rape accusers into question because "everyone responds differently."
Let's be real, this isn't about any investigation, but about the rampage Candace Owens has been on - accusing everyone in Charlie's orbit of betraying him and being complicit in his murder.
Big difference is that rape accusers have an accusations they're trying to prove, while in this case, people are claiming that this poor woman was complicit in her husband's murder. If you can successfully cast some doubt on a rape accuser, that will bring the claim beneath the 'reasonable doubt' threshold. But you need gigantic amounts of proof for this nefarious business.
Kyle was accused of that by political activists who wanted to lynch him for racial reasons even though it was a clear cut case of self defense. His breaking down in the court room and getting overwhelmed by the memories of what had happened is a natural reaction. It wasn't in any way weird or strange.
That is not comparable to this situation.
Her behavior was strange before anyone accused her of anything. For example she uploaded a very creepy closeup video of her kissing her dead husbands hands.
You cannot tell me that her behavior in that interview seems genuine to you. There is absolutely no way she's talking from the heart. Obviously that doesn't have to mean anything but it is very fucking weird and that she wants people to stop asking questions makes it even weirder.
Rittenhouse was also facing the very real possibility of being locked away forever to sate the bloodlust of the BLM chimps.
A year after being in the custody of the State for long periods.
And sitting across from fink faggot corrupt prosecutors that literally argued "Everyone has to take a beating sometime".
And now Erika Kirk has been accused of all sorts of things after her husband was just murdered. Putting a lot of pressure on her and then claiming victory when that pressure leads to her acting in ways they find weird.
It's not the same, but it's most definitely comparable.
I've seen people deal more weirdly with deaths that were much more natural and at a more normal age than this.
She wants Candace Owens to stop flinging crap at everyone and everything. That's all. I'm not going to stop "asking questions". I'm not going to imply that a grieving widow was involved in the murder of the father of her children tho.
She is also being accused by political activists
Also, lying.