I am curious to know what the metric is for "inclusiveness" - ie how do these people who want a thing to "be more inclusive", decide which actions to take to achieve it, and measure whether they were successful.
Another question is what the reason is for wanting to do this, but that might be tackled in light of the metric. But what is it?
Maybe this proves that Italians are of-colours.
It's always struck me as odd that Spaniards in Spain aren't of-coloured, but those that moved to the americas are "brown bodies". Perhaps Italians visiting the UK are colourful.
She might just be saying what (she thinks that) the studio or industry "wants" to hear, in response to some leading question.
I disagree with the Drinker saying that women can't have an impressive, imposing physiques are the preserve of chaps. In my ideal marvel universe the ladies would have harder bodies, which might also please the journalists, but also more shiny catsuits, stiletto boots etc, which might not.
Until this happens, I can just continue to throw money at Kickasskandy and similar.
With aliens, the audience roots for Ripley in part because they know what she knows, and what the bureaucrats and gung-ho professional soldiers don't listen to. It has something in common with the typical contemporary girl better than stinky boys thing, but without denigrating half the audience.
According to some self appointed expert website referenced by the article: "“Demisexual people only feel sexually attracted to someone when they have an emotional bond,”
If some new word can be "discovered" and defined such that people of that "sexual orientation" "only feel sexually attracted to someone when they are married to them", then God's light might be strayed closer to.
I suspect Jack is actually not nearly as bad as people make out. Will be interested to see what he does, or is revealed to have been doing, next.