8
f1111 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hang about. I got the impression that Telegram was to facilitate free expression. I didn't get an account because it requires a phone number. Any recommendations?

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is madness. Hopefully enough people will notice and favour any companies and services that actually do what they're supposed to. (ie, provide goods and services to those who wish to pay for them, without discrimination)

7
f1111 7 points ago +7 / -0

Perhaps in future, people will swat themselves so they can build a relationship with their local police at a time of their choosing!

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's true, but I use the same VPN for the entire computer. Maybe there are other ways to configure it.

4
f1111 4 points ago +4 / -0

Perhaps Raytheon will pivot into smart-IEDs-as-a-service.

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

It seems odd that they're using FMV for this, when it has fallen out of fashion for the cutscenes themselves.

5
f1111 5 points ago +5 / -0

It gets written about in the press.

1
f1111 1 point ago +1 / -0

Presumably they want to recruit even the not very capable for propaganda value when they die horribly. I don't know how to feel about this.

1
f1111 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes I had the same thought. Perhaps he means some kind of peaceful voluntary collaboration between neighbours or something. Or perhaps paying lip-service to stuff like that means more people stick around and listen, and Youtube doesn't derank or close the channel as quickly.

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but it adds latency.

4
f1111 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you can use maths like that, then a braver man than i can complete this thought.

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm no word expert, but would "celebrate her" be better?

18
f1111 18 points ago +18 / -0

The best evidence I have that it is credible is that reddit quarantined it.

9
f1111 9 points ago +9 / -0

Snopes rated false: technically, it's not your DNA any more, since it infringes several patents.

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

We live in a twitterocracy. I don't like it.

7
f1111 7 points ago +7 / -0

badass doesn't have a space. Gary Glitter was a bad ass leader.

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is really shit.

7
f1111 7 points ago +7 / -0

The point is to normalise oppression and financial deplatforming of people within and without the US, whenever they say so.

1
f1111 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liz Truss would actually be pretty good as PM. I could be wrong. I also have some money on this, if Ladbrokes haven't figured out some way to weasel out of the bet.

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

By "state sponsored", does that mean that the money I pay to the government is actually going to these overpaid, RGB LGB-Tedious video shitter-outers? Taxation is theft, but if it actually did go to feeding the poor and making the trains run on time, I wouldn't mind nearly as much.

5
f1111 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm surprised they don't isolate the audio from the speaker and pipe in fake applause.

4
f1111 4 points ago +4 / -0

I didn't know Imgur had a front page. Though it was just image hosting.

2
f1111 2 points ago +2 / -0

900,000 lines of code? Are journalists defining the entire repo including GUI, fonts etc as "the algorithm"?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›