but it'd be less objectionable if they actually acted like it didn't matter (and picked the man for the job)
No such thing in film & theatre. Casting directors always cast on opinion, and more often than not engage in nepotism. Additionally, you can always find someone that matches the source material perfectly. Not doing so is a deliberate act.
You can literally use archived newspapers and journals to see the point at which the average surface level temperature of the Earth "changed" from 15ºC to 14ºC with no explanation back in 1997.
Plans for a 15-storey women-only tower block in west London have been given the green light.
Brook House, an area of low-rise blocks owned by WPA opposite Acton Town tube station, will be knocked down and replaced.
The proposals received 56 objections, with eight expressions of support. Concerns, which were raised by residents, conservation groups and the Met Police, objected to the height of the building and the risk of anti-social behaviour, as well as the impact on the environment and pollution. One objector warned the area would turn into a "concrete jungle".
It was also disclosed that the site had not been deemed suitable for tall buildings in Ealing Council's local strategy. Despite the number of objections, Ealing Council said the concerns were "not considered sufficient to outweigh" the recommendation for approval.
When something is done for women, it doesn't matter if it goes against your own strategy. Make it make sense.
Zoom and Teams is unironically better than YouTube for streaming (Zoom can’t even ingest rtmp yet, let that sink in). Most corps do use expensive streaming orgs like Brightcove, although it’s probably better for multinationals with money to burn on gourmet meals and exotic plants.
t. AV tech
Farrow added: “It’s scary that the police can take someone’s word for something and just come and arrest you. All they could say is ‘we’ve had an allegation which needs to be investigated.'”
The “funny” part about this is that if you call the police and inform them that someone has threatened to kill you, they’ll tell you that they can’t prevent a potential crime, only react to it. That is, until, you say no no words on the internet. 🙄
Very subtle https://i.imgur.com/TPLaBbY_d.webp
That's more than enough agents for any of them to be provocateurs and cause significant damage. Would explain why the Capitol Police let the protestors in as FBI answers to Congress. Beyond an inside job, just like many of us suspected as it was happening.