has there been legislation or court cases stating they're not? generally curious as to why you think this is the case.
seems obvious that online speech is protected under the 1st amendment, but we live in a clown world, so I don't doubt you.
10 points
ago
+10 / -0
there something more seriously than a lot of billionaires that have a lot influence fucking little kids?
i'd argue exposing such people and executing them on national television (yeah, i know it won't happen) is of the upmost importance.
https://nitter.net/ecotwil/status/1730079788730114401
explains a lot
jews dead-set on killing off all White people