9
The_Gay_Deceiver 9 points ago +10 / -1

Chris Rock said it perfect 20 years ago, and he can't unsay it no matter how much he wants to.

What'd he say? I'm gonna guess something like "there are black people, and then there's niggers."

Which is actually my boomer dad's way of putting it as well. I guess I can't say it's a bad way to put it.

Just adding to the conversation, me and my friend actually use nigger as a kind of verb and will say it about whoever. Usually for exceptionally petty theft. Like we had some faggot take our stuff out and steal our cart at the store one time, described it as "niggered our cart".

7
The_Gay_Deceiver 7 points ago +7 / -0

There's a reason Islamic terror attacks are much more scarce in the US.

Well, two. The first being we don't import as many. Which is obviously a massive factor, but also it's because the US isn't to the point where it tolerates terror attacks yet.

Remember that draw Muhammad competition in Texas and as soon as some angry muzzies acted up they found out? There was no retaliation after it happened.

Stalwart enforcement of laws and principles works. Even against the most ideologically radical types because even they will realize they need to pump the brakes a bit and proceed more cautiously.

But it'll never happen with blacks in Democrat strongholds as long as the political corruption persists.

20
The_Gay_Deceiver 20 points ago +21 / -1

I like the rule here. I can say the nigger word I just can't use it on anyone.

That's how I do it irl anyway. I've never unironically called a black person nigger before. Earnest insults based on race are pretty weak anyway.

1
The_Gay_Deceiver 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah yes. I've only been looking at this from the American perspective. I bet all these countries with socialized healthcare systems have absolutely loved all the new justification to write shit off. Bet they've saved billions.

4
The_Gay_Deceiver 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not even a Christian dude. It's just blatantly clear monogamy is the best way to raise kids.

And we're not gonna defeat shit if everyone with any kind of moral constitution dies out in a generation.

22
The_Gay_Deceiver 22 points ago +23 / -1

The stage was not set for feminism to take hold due to a tenuous agreement between religious people and feminists that porn was amoral. Their reasons for thinking it weren't even the same (religious: it's simply amoral, don't do it - fems: its degrading to women, male fantasy, whatever). That's like saying people like us are in a partnership with TERFs because we both disagree with trannies. You have a real time example of that being not the case and you can't see it just because this one sparse historical connection could possibly lend credence to your view with a few truckloads of added assumptions.

You need to stop this top down approach of attributing everything to your disliked group and then trying to draw a line from there. You're worse than the zealots on consumeproduct with jews.

27
The_Gay_Deceiver 27 points ago +27 / -0

religious shits been going on for thousands of years

gender roles have been maintained throughout them out of necessity

religions coincide with gender roles because they coincide similarly with the necessities of life

wealth expands in the early 19th century and gives rise to greedy jealous faggots (socialists)

feminism coincides with the retard ideology because women realized they could play the class game

but no its totally religon's fault

3
The_Gay_Deceiver 3 points ago +3 / -0

alright I followed everything else but wtf does poundmetoo mean? lol

29
The_Gay_Deceiver 29 points ago +33 / -4

I myself am a MGTOW who doesn't want to date, fuck or cohabitate with a woman and I definitely will never marry.

I like how it took all of this modernist bullshit to make young people who generally stray from religion realize that traditional religious practices are actually a good fucking idea lol.

4
The_Gay_Deceiver 4 points ago +4 / -0

They don't do that either. The air just blasts out the sides and rolls around and diffuses into the air all the same. Unless you have that one that's fitted to your face with adhesives that makes you breath everything through a filter, it's worthless.

I suspect that even if those weren't in far too short supply for the general populace to use, a lot fewer people would be willing to put up with that.

3
The_Gay_Deceiver 3 points ago +3 / -0

In this one I'm remembering they had the kiddos put on some kind of outer rubber coat and goggles or something to make it seem even more dystopic. I think it was told from the perspective of the kid's mom who was trying her darnedest to give her kids a relatively normal beach experience despite the dangers.

I also remember them saying something like "we could tolerate the sun's rays for a short time without the equipment, which we did just to enjoy the beach air for a moment, but only for a short time".

100% blatant turbo propaganda. At least 15 years later and literally nothing's changed.

14
The_Gay_Deceiver 14 points ago +14 / -0

Early 2000's they ran the shit about the ozone too.

I distinctly remember propaganda stories we had to read about how if you want to go to the beach to make sandcastles you would have to wear a bunch of protective equipment, and that it was just for sandcastles because going in the water made it worse or something.

22
The_Gay_Deceiver 22 points ago +22 / -0

Still approaching it incorrectly. Always remember the government has no true legal standing to regulate private ownership of weapons.

They can false flag all of the kids they like, that fact will never change.

34
The_Gay_Deceiver 34 points ago +34 / -0

Black people: BLM! Black power! Fuck whitey! We own this shit now!

Literally any Democrat: strolls up and slaps the fuck out of him

Literally any Democrat: You're going to vote Democrat next time around, right boy?

Black people: yes massa

blackcommunity.jpg

3
The_Gay_Deceiver 3 points ago +3 / -0

The more attention he gets while people disregard Biden because everything he says is stupid, incomprehensible and painfully boring, the more awareness of the sham of it all, I would say. If enough people wake up that will undoubtedly turn the tide.

3
The_Gay_Deceiver 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is discriminatory and the legal arguement can already be made (racial protection laws in the states do not distinguish which races they protect). The issue is craptivist legislators, lawyers and judges corrupting the system and turning a blind eye to it.

3
The_Gay_Deceiver 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm glad you said this. I STILL see a lot of people use the terms "commie", "socialist", "marxist", etc. in a pejorative sense against the left nowadays.. mostly naive boomercons.. but lots of political newbies on the right too.

I do. To me it's like calling them a faggot. I'm aware it's a generalization. But at the same time I would argue it's all the same shit. Still, I use it in a dismissive fashion with people I don't have any intention of actually engaging with. Otherwise I probably wouldn't be calling them names in the first place.

And similarly, I guess the boomercons now just love to use "Xiden" instead of "Biden" because of blah blah chinese ccp puppet whatever.. but these were the same people who complained when Trump was called Drumpf.

I prefer "Most popular president of all time Joe Biden" myself.

6
The_Gay_Deceiver 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes and one could argue those things are an infringement on personal freedoms and should be avoided. I'm not sure if it's actually unconstitutional in the UK, however.

As far as the US is concerned, there's the possibility of martial law but it's well regulated by the fact that the citizenry is extremely well armed and they generally know it's not a good idea to do it, let along maintain it too long, without legitimizing reasons.

There's a delicate balance to it, sometimes restrictions via martial law are actually legitimate and it's a good idea. Imo that's best regulated by having a dangerous populace like the US has. It's a hard thing to argue when the restrictions are too much, so the best course of action is to have it subject to the will of the people, and backed by arms.

9
The_Gay_Deceiver 9 points ago +9 / -0

Hahaha, one? I wish. In Germany we have around 70 state-run local radio stations. They're all fear porn, far-left bullshit and government propaganda.

Literally NPR. They have local stations in lots of places in all the states. They all play the core national programs but when those aren't on it's all local.

People who don't realize NPR is state propaganda are serious tards.

15
The_Gay_Deceiver 15 points ago +15 / -0

James O'Keefe was falsely put on the NICS to deny him his 2nd amendment and he won that one very quickly.

Reminds me of how UK judges were putting Tommy Robinson in jail for whatever short periods of time they could justify in the hopes that the Muslims there would off him. I bet they were hoping someone would attack him and he wouldn't have legal recourse to defend himself properly.

5
The_Gay_Deceiver 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sooooew, is there a solution other than what Hitler tried? Obviously reverting to as small a government as possible will constrict such influence. But idk.

Also, if you know, I'm curious what the fundamental difference is between Islam and Judaism that makes Jews so much better at manipulating other groups non-violently whenever pretty much all the Muslims have is radicalization and terrorism? There's obviously some kind of major intellectual difference between the two that I'm having trouble substantiating from simply a religion.

10
The_Gay_Deceiver 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah it's funny. The idea is "it's anonymous and they have no reason to lie, so why would they?" But they don't realize the double edged sword in that case lol.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›