Matthew 5:10-12 "Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." "Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake." "Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you."
1Pet 3:12-16 For the eyes of the Lord are over the righteous, and his ears are open unto their prayers: but the face of the Lord is against them that do evil. And who is he that will harm you, if ye be followers of that which is good? But and if ye suffer for righteousness’ sake, happy are ye: and be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ.
Wicked overreaches are a boon for you before they eyes of God who see's everything. Also and before the eyes of men if you know how (and are able) to capitalize on them.
Though really sometimes, It can end up being far more effective to let God have his way with them.
Romans 12:19-21 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord. Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
Matthew 6:34 "Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof."
I recommend also reading the context in Matthew 6:24-34 for a beautiful scriptural "whitepill". Finally also:
Matt 10:28 "And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
He just needs to write some articles delivering fulsome praise upon the Biden administration to get his Social Credit score back up to the point he can travel again.
James O'Keefe was falsely put on the NICS to deny him his 2nd amendment and he won that one very quickly.
Reminds me of how UK judges were putting Tommy Robinson in jail for whatever short periods of time they could justify in the hopes that the Muslims there would off him. I bet they were hoping someone would attack him and he wouldn't have legal recourse to defend himself properly.
The airlines also have their own no-fly lists, which they share with each other. You would think that would fall under "Refusal to Deal" anti-trust laws, but I doubt any court would rule that way because "muh pandemic" or "muh insurrection".
... Why would libertarians respond to a government mandated enforcement mechanism by telling people to build an airline that is still going to be subject to government regulation?
That's like saying that Nick Fuentes got a search warrant on his house, and that lolbertarians would respond by telling him to build his own house. ... That's not going to do anything, and isn't related to anything either.
Depends on which “the no-fly list” we’re talking about, which is why people should really be more specific.
There’s speculation that he’s been put on an industry no-fly list due to mask wearing-related “offenses” on a previous flight that he tweeted about. If so, that would not be “government mandated”.
I kinda understand where the OP is coming from but the argument is nonsense. In a free market companies would tend not to bar people from doing business with them. That would be stupid. It might happen - companies are often stupid - but there would be many more airlines to choose from. (so less likely they'd all follow the same no-fly list)
(I'm NOT a "free market is perfect and solves everything" type, but it's going to work better than anything we have now.)
Commercial air travel is one of if not the most heavily regulated industry in existence. As such it is subject to significant regulatory capture and cannot be considered a "free market". This is something a lot of "liberaltarians" or "lolbertarians" (not accusing you or the GP of this, but I have had to make this point to some people IRL) forget.
That said, even in AnCapistan airlines would have insurers who would probably have all number of policy riders that set standards for passengers who were an increased safety risk and whose passage on an insured aircraft would invalidate the policy. "Rule by Actuary" is a problem I've yet to see an AnCap give serious treatment to.
You post that as if it wasn't some distinctly orchestrated false flag by the Left, completely with police removing barriers and telling people to "Go, go, go!" toward the Capitol building.
Finding videos of the incident has become difficult due to it all being banned/censored from Big Tech controlled sites, but here's the video of the police waving people in, (conveniently YouTube has it behind an age restriction):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJiKVpHlLcU&ab_channel=SteveBlevins
You post that as if it wasn't some distinctly orchestrated false flag by the Left, completely with police removing barriers and telling people to "Go, go, go!" toward the Capitol building.
I made no statement at all about that. I don't think it's a 'false flag', but I think it's been greatly exaggerated and that there is mass hysteria about it. So it would not be surprising that they would be targeting him for being present at said 'peaceful protest'.
Even if he was at the protest, adding people to no-fly list if they didn't cause any disruptions is bullcrap.
Of course it is. And even people who do cause disruptions - since when is it justified to put people on a no-fly list for 'causing disruptions'?
Get the right plane and you don't need an airfield.
The Fi 156 has a stall speed of 31 miles an hour. There was an occasion in Italy where they quite literally VTOL'ed on the top of a hill by just steering into the wind.
I seem to recall seeing a short documentary about modern barnstormers. Obviously it'd be more dangerous and slower, but theoretically you could fly anywhere you want.
If you look at his tweets, he had a ticket purchased, but was unable to get a boarding pass. He then tried multiple other airlines with the same result
Wicked overreaches are a boon for you before they eyes of God who see's everything. Also and before the eyes of men if you know how (and are able) to capitalize on them.
Though really sometimes, It can end up being far more effective to let God have his way with them.
I recommend also reading the context in Matthew 6:24-34 for a beautiful scriptural "whitepill". Finally also:
Treated like a terrorist for being anti immigration and not believing that trans women are women.
We might as well prepare to meet eachother in a mass grave for wrongthinkers, 'cause that's where this is going.
Don't worry, we can laugh at them and point out their hypocrisy as they force us to dig our grave
He just needs to write some articles delivering fulsome praise upon the Biden administration to get his Social Credit score back up to the point he can travel again.
What makes you think the courts will side with a questionably straight huwite male over the federal government?
Reminds me of how UK judges were putting Tommy Robinson in jail for whatever short periods of time they could justify in the hopes that the Muslims there would off him. I bet they were hoping someone would attack him and he wouldn't have legal recourse to defend himself properly.
He should definetely try, but Fuentes doesn't have friends in Wasington or the media reach. Con Inc explicitly hates him.
The airlines also have their own no-fly lists, which they share with each other. You would think that would fall under "Refusal to Deal" anti-trust laws, but I doubt any court would rule that way because "muh pandemic" or "muh insurrection".
Muh domestic white terrorist
... Why would libertarians respond to a government mandated enforcement mechanism by telling people to build an airline that is still going to be subject to government regulation?
That's like saying that Nick Fuentes got a search warrant on his house, and that lolbertarians would respond by telling him to build his own house. ... That's not going to do anything, and isn't related to anything either.
Depends on which “the no-fly list” we’re talking about, which is why people should really be more specific.
There’s speculation that he’s been put on an industry no-fly list due to mask wearing-related “offenses” on a previous flight that he tweeted about. If so, that would not be “government mandated”.
If that were the case, TSA wouldn't have been involved at all
I kinda understand where the OP is coming from but the argument is nonsense. In a free market companies would tend not to bar people from doing business with them. That would be stupid. It might happen - companies are often stupid - but there would be many more airlines to choose from. (so less likely they'd all follow the same no-fly list)
(I'm NOT a "free market is perfect and solves everything" type, but it's going to work better than anything we have now.)
Commercial air travel is one of if not the most heavily regulated industry in existence. As such it is subject to significant regulatory capture and cannot be considered a "free market". This is something a lot of "liberaltarians" or "lolbertarians" (not accusing you or the GP of this, but I have had to make this point to some people IRL) forget.
That said, even in AnCapistan airlines would have insurers who would probably have all number of policy riders that set standards for passengers who were an increased safety risk and whose passage on an insured aircraft would invalidate the policy. "Rule by Actuary" is a problem I've yet to see an AnCap give serious treatment to.
Reject insurance.
Embrace black market airlines.
Well, obviously some would, but it's rare. Some people are genuinely worth banning.
Black market airlines now.
Allegedly. Though he was part of the January 6th "peaceful protest", so that may explain this.
I am glad he didn't lie, because principled people including Greenwald denounced this.
All of the people involved in January 6th are on a no-fly list? Does this extend to those protesting outside the capitol building?
I'm more curious about the Antifa members who were filming inside the Capitol building.
You post that as if it wasn't some distinctly orchestrated false flag by the Left, completely with police removing barriers and telling people to "Go, go, go!" toward the Capitol building.
Finding videos of the incident has become difficult due to it all being banned/censored from Big Tech controlled sites, but here's the video of the police waving people in, (conveniently YouTube has it behind an age restriction): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJiKVpHlLcU&ab_channel=SteveBlevins
Here's another of the videos of the police purposely removing the barriers to let people in: https://rumble.com/vchzin-capitol-police-appear-to-remove-fence-barrier-containing-protestors.html
The video of the police opening the doors of the Capitol building to let people in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiF4EIReuY4
And the infamous video of the police leading the "protestors" through the building and up to the second floor: https://rumble.com/vcj6kn-the-poor-security-at-the-capitol-1-7-201.html
Even if he was at the protest, adding people to no-fly list if they didn't cause any disruptions is bullcrap.
I made no statement at all about that. I don't think it's a 'false flag', but I think it's been greatly exaggerated and that there is mass hysteria about it. So it would not be surprising that they would be targeting him for being present at said 'peaceful protest'.
Of course it is. And even people who do cause disruptions - since when is it justified to put people on a no-fly list for 'causing disruptions'?
Why would they put an FBI informant on the no fly list?
Get the right plane and you don't need an airfield.
The Fi 156 has a stall speed of 31 miles an hour. There was an occasion in Italy where they quite literally VTOL'ed on the top of a hill by just steering into the wind.
I seem to recall seeing a short documentary about modern barnstormers. Obviously it'd be more dangerous and slower, but theoretically you could fly anywhere you want.
A smart libertarian would point out that airlines are basically controlled by the government so that shit show is not representative of a free market.
Every time.
He's an edgy paleo conservative. Anti-immigration, anti-foreign aid to Israel, pro-Christian, American First.
MIght have been due to his role in this thing
If you look at his tweets, he had a ticket purchased, but was unable to get a boarding pass. He then tried multiple other airlines with the same result