17
SturmMilfEnthusiast 17 points ago +17 / -0

Had another thought I want to expand on.

When somebody refers to a normal person by "their" pronouns, it's not because they were told, it's because it's obvious. But it's also because they're being honest. In the most basic terms, they're experiencing the world and truthfully describing their perception. It's not something most of us even need to explain, it's just a natural state of living. Even literal drooling retards do this, to the best of their ability.

If an otherwise intelligent person repeatedly misgendered a normal person, it would be a problem. Not because of it's an insult, but because it's deeply dishonest. That's a level of dishonesty and belligerence that would make them incompatible with polite society. Being honest with your senses is the single most basic form of honesty there is, that's why we medicalize dishonest senses as "delusions." If you aren't suffering from delusions, you're just that dishonest by nature, then you're evil almost by definition.

Trannies use their social power to make us lie to remain in polite society, meaning any time we're in the presence of a tranny, we're a society of sociopaths, choosing to lie about our basic senses. What would otherwise be psychotic, violent anger is a totally healthy and justified reaction to a sociopathic society. Some dude having a whinge is almost too tame, by comparison.

19
SturmMilfEnthusiast 19 points ago +19 / -0

The problem is that there's not much recognition on the right that tranny pronouns aren't pronouns, they're titles, but we're all still using the term "pronoun" to refer to them, because it's just too damn difficult to do otherwise.

Pronouns are descriptive. A thing can be blue, or large, or dry, or masculine, and these are all obvious to anyone with functional senses. All a pronoun does is refer to a person in general, using their plainly obvious description, rather than specifically.

Tranny pronouns are titles. They aren't descriptive, they're prescribed. Just like tranny pronouns, your senses don't tell you if somebody is a Sir, or My Lord, or Your Honorable. Trannies have to tell your their pronouns the same as nobility once had to present their titles. And like titles, if you choose not to use one after being told to, you can be punished for it.

Backdooring titles into pronouns makes it damn near impossible to deal with. There's no other language you can fall back on, and it's a complicated enough trick that people aren't going to independently invent and settle on pithy comebacks to their attacks.

My best attempt at a comeback to your example would be something like "They stopped being used like pronouns a long time ago," and that doesn't exactly embed that entire explanation into one sentence, does it? It's one of those end-stage leftist tricks that's so complex and manipulative, I can't imagine how you can beat it with speech. Language and human limitations are more easily weaponized by the dishonest.

15
SturmMilfEnthusiast 15 points ago +15 / -0

All I did was jokingly point out that that criticism may not actually apply to him, and you're chimping out like I called him a nigger. If you're implying what I think you're implying, then good work, you proved a point I wasn't even trying to make.

12
SturmMilfEnthusiast 12 points ago +13 / -1

and made by people who hate you

I think OP is our token black, so they'd actually worship him, at least at first glance.

3
SturmMilfEnthusiast 3 points ago +3 / -0

If it's his job, he's not doing it "for free." He's just doing an incredibly shitty job. Guys like this aren't worth defending anyways. He's practically advertising for Bethesda, and his sperge out is better propaganda for leftists than it is for us. There is absolutely no benefit to having him around.

2
SturmMilfEnthusiast 2 points ago +2 / -0

A few years ago, I started assuming that in every photograph of MLK Jr., if you could somehow magically turn the camera around, you'd see a bunch of shit on fire. That's more or less how it works now, after all, at least when they're not brazenly gloating by showing us the fire.

11
SturmMilfEnthusiast 11 points ago +11 / -0

Well they fucked up then, cause you most certainly can kill animals. In fact, you have to if you want to survive the first stage of the game. You can't actually grow anything until you make it way out to one of the islands, and most people take a couple hours just to get settled first.

27
SturmMilfEnthusiast 27 points ago +27 / -0

Maybe if we could convince self-hating whites that they aren't the "good ones," they'll finally rope themselves en masse and we'll be spared their endless faggotry.

39
SturmMilfEnthusiast 39 points ago +39 / -0

  T W O

W E E K S

6
SturmMilfEnthusiast 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, using Brave. I don't care enough to test specifically what it is, but I'm guessing it's uBlock Origin. It works in a private window.

15
SturmMilfEnthusiast 15 points ago +15 / -0

Not sounding the alarm was a calculated choice. This isn't like the carpet catching fire in a brick apartment, where everyone outside can stand around and watch. You do not want people going in the wrong direction in a wildifre. It can sit and smolder for hours, then one gust of wind and half a mile is burned out in a couple minutes. You wouldn't have a chance to run at that point. That's why most wildfire warnings have you prepped to evacuate on a known route long before you can even see the fire.

6
SturmMilfEnthusiast 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's what the mute function does. It's already a feature. It has been for god knows how long.

2
SturmMilfEnthusiast 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's old fashion sense. When you're trying to be more traditional, the men usually wear darker colors - notice that they're all wearing dark green. Somehow it highlights their masculinity. Most of the women are wearing bright red, to try to look more youthful. Darker colors on women either make them more sensual, or more maternal, and that uncertainty is why women were traditionally more careful with them.

I don't know why any of it works that way, but it does. The women who self-insert into these movies probably play at heterodoxy, but when it comes right down to it, it works on them. To quote RLM, "You may not have noticed, but your brain did." I'm certain whoever did the advertising was well aware of that.

1
SturmMilfEnthusiast 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's just denial. Secular Christmas is obviously real or he wouldn't have a clue what you're talking about. Western Christians haven't figured out how to live on the cultural fringes yet, and obstinate pedantry is just a poor way of coping with it.

46
SturmMilfEnthusiast 46 points ago +46 / -0

That's a given. The funny thing about the word "modder" is that it barely has anything to do with the word "moderator," yet the worst modders have the exact same disposition. The owner of Nexus himself isn't a modder, but he runs his site like a personal fiefdom, and is too much of a chickenshit to plainly lay out his rules, because if he did, he'd only be advertising just how much of a diva he is.

56
SturmMilfEnthusiast 56 points ago +56 / -0

If nothing else it'll be a good test of ModDB. No doubt there'll be shrieking now that it's in a more publicly visible location.

8
SturmMilfEnthusiast 8 points ago +8 / -0

I've heard this a lot but I really don't think it's true. It certainly doesn't explain the numbers. Even gen Xers weren't being dragged to church by their parents at anywhere near the rates the boomers were. As a millenial, growing up, I intellectually knew some families went to church, but I only met a handful of kids for whom that was a reality. None of those kids grew up to be anti-theists.

The fall of Christianity and the generation it was most noticable in are conflated, but you have to look a few generations back to find the actual beginning. Millenial anti-theism has its own mythology about the evils of Christianity, but none of them ever actually went to church to begin with, let alone experienced any kind of Christian "oppression" like they claimed to feel.

14
SturmMilfEnthusiast 14 points ago +17 / -3

If you get your ass beat defending Lowes and their first response is to fire you for it, it wasn't a decent place to begin with. Especially since the ones who fired you don't suffer any consequences for it, and the ones who attacked you are gonna get a slap on the wrist. All you're left with in the end is a beating.

10
SturmMilfEnthusiast 10 points ago +10 / -0

So, it should be obvious to anyone with a brain that they are deliberately overcharging and over sentencing the January 6th people to send a message that if you mess with the government like that they will destroy you.

They admitted that when they sentenced the shaman. "It's not about what you did, it's about what you represent" I think was the judge's quote.

0
SturmMilfEnthusiast 0 points ago +3 / -3

Glad to see my old elementary school teachers have hobbies in their retirement, even if it's apparently writing slogans for feds.

3
SturmMilfEnthusiast 3 points ago +3 / -0

Titles and special military privileges. It's a good thing they're useless cosmopolitans, otherwise Gates could dole out some land and round off this new generation of petty nobility.

3
SturmMilfEnthusiast 3 points ago +3 / -0

If that were all it was, lefties wouldn't have cracked down as hard and as quickly as they did.

Superstraight revealed that trannies have a difficult relationship with consent. In the current culture, supposedly, anyone has any right to deny or revoke consent, for any reason, at any time. "Any reason" includes biological sex. That means there's at least one reasonable and completely unassailable context in which trannies could not punish you for denying them.

It forced them into a position where you can either side with trannies, or respect consent, but not both. And of course, every single non-leftist person, even the normies, are going to respect consent. The trannies threw fits, because they are entitled little predators, and for just a moment, that truth was undeniable. All leftists could do is shut it down as hard and as fast as possible.

9
SturmMilfEnthusiast 9 points ago +9 / -0

At this point, the FBI should change their slogan to "We live to fish."

9
SturmMilfEnthusiast 9 points ago +9 / -0

One is a suggestion, a line of inquiry. The other is a definitive statement. The headline does the latter, but the body repeatedly does the former twice right in the opening:

claiming the bug was a genetically engineered bioweapon that may have been “ethnically targeted” to spare Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people.

Kennedy floated the idea

The thing about "antisemitism" is that its loudest opponents are always the most deliberate liars. They have to be, because their schtick requires that any opposition to any bad behavior by any Jew, or to any special treatment of any Jew, is to be treated like genocide.

The key word here is "deliberate." In any other hit piece, the writer might just be a retard. But when it comes to antisemitism, that need to exaggerate harm to comical levels means that there's no room for the benefit of the doubt. The whole thing is already an act, so you can't treat any part of the smear as incidental.

4
SturmMilfEnthusiast 4 points ago +4 / -0

Right, even if you consider the animal fuckers, I can't imagine there's a particularly high number of bear fuckers out there. They're just not popular animals in general. Furries seem to gravitate towards either what's culturally popular (so, wolves), or whatever animal is featured in their favored autistic obsession. There's a reason you never hear of duck furries. Unless I gravely misunderstood what a "gay bear" was, there's just no way it's fueled by an actual sexual interest.

It might be in 10 years because of this, but not right now, at least.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›