Yet another psyop to get the public to support the expansion of government further into our daily lives.
I'm going to guess that the answer is "fuck no!"
^ This guy watches campaign ads from the 1950s lol
Yes, it is a shame. We would have been significantly better off today had we taken heed of this idea.
President Eisenhower imagined what could have been done with all that money in the 1950s:
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone.
It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.
The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities.
It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population.
It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some 50 miles of concrete highway.
We pay for a single fighter plane with a half million bushels of wheat.
We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people.
Could replace the Walmart setting with a public school and that would be the only major change in detail.
Blue sky? It's Blue Cry. (No Agenda podcast came up with this, not me. I just agree with it.)
I wonder if 2 years of development and growth being stolen from them has had any impacts...
Yes, it has. Just visit any high school and observe for the day. You will see it.
I liked Penguin and also agree with some of the criticism about the girl boss stuff. Shame about Vincent.
HL2: Update is a sort of remaster by a fan. It has updated lighting and some bug fixes as I recall. I played it a long time ago, its the original game just with improvements to the visuals.
Yeah, hope they don't squander it too much.
This is from PC Gamer, who are a bunch of liberal cucks that are known to twist words. Houser has a better reason than the implied "orage man bad" that the headline suggests. https://archive.is/Jv8SM
That's too bad.
Probably by not allowing them to pick someone else to run as their party's choice for president and instead announcing herself instead.
IGN edited out the blatant political support description but here is the cringe: https://youtu.be/sKakDER6pT4?si=602tzZuMVww_ebkX
I don't know. I won't give her my attention. The only similar instance that comes to mind is saying she wants to legalize marijuana (said for the 2020 election and now again in the attempt at targeting black men who smoke it).
May also be lazy. She's admitted that she smokes weed.
Based.
Mirrormask was really good.
If the exec doesn't work there now, was this statement made before, or after, the separation?
Problem that I see with that thinking is right wing people vote for Republicans. As soon as Trump is done running for President, those Republicans are going to go immediately back to foisting shit candidates upon voters. Candidates no better than what the Democrats have to offer. The Republicans don't truly support Trump except where their interests overlap. So unfortunately, it seems unlikely we would be any better off even the right wing voters were the people the left makes them out to be because they'll just be sold out by the uniparty establishment.
May have been looking through the windows of the citizens car, which brought his attention to their presence.
Sounds like the judge started out doing his job responsibly then got his dick wet.