You are not speaking to my point, but around it. English Protestantism must be the ideology occupying the value system of the state, in order for it to limit itself. The doctrine of separation caused English Protestantism to vacate the state, making room for Progressivism to enter.
The institution is occupied by people, and those people will have values. Either those values will be chaotic, and the institution will collapse, or those values will harmonize, that harmony being described by a moral system.
A state having a moral system described by a religion doesn't necessarily mean it will violently enforce that religion. It depends on the religion. Islam, progressivism, communism, these will be violently enforced. Christianity, there is no guarantee.
Man, I wish the industry were only as outright politically activist as it was in 2014. I used to be able to tell coworkers my political beliefs without them taking the first opportunity available to run me out of town.
It's also nothing compared to the 2038 problem. Unlike Y2k, where the things that needed to change were mostly display-side, and the few things to get missed weren't critical, it is virtually guaranteed that central infrastructure in multiple countries will be missed. Then, in the early morning of January 19, 2038, UTC, these central systems will suddenly believe its December 12, 1912.
I don't think I am. The ideology is specifically designed to enable the footsoldiers, not to wrap them up writing theory papers. It hands those emotional losers the guise of righteous anger to go about doing what they always wished they could. They may not understand it, but they do believe it.
All those DnD people saying black people are orcs have a nice bit of representation at the tower of Cirith Ungol, as well.