Title is clunky but correct. The guidelines only apply to short jail sentences, so everyone who would've otherwise been jailed for a short period won't be - except straight white men who will be jailed as per normal.
There's a linked tweet or something in the last tweet in this thread which shows as "unavailable" to me - anyone know what that is/was?
Severely needs more attention. This is massive, absolutely massive.
Why is it making all of them some variation of goblin? I'll bet it's Progressivism's antagonism toward family.
he dodged a bullet
Dodged one but caught another
I don't even like Disney but that first one "slapped" as the kids say. 2nd one made me want to rip my brain out.
Every theme park in NY will either close down now or have to replace everything to accomodate landwhales and prices will skyrocket and they'll have to close down later anyway.
TIL much of academia, the media, and even the UN itself have been trying to genocide men for years.
https://www.youtube.com/@UnleashedComedy/videos
It's hit and miss but there are some good ones.
The replies are without exception skewering them. One of the replies points out that the author is a DIE consultant. That would make this article undeclared advertising and probably illegal.
Also, previously, if you searched an exact quote from a tweet Google would return it in the top result. Now it's not even returned unless you add "twitter" to the search string.
Ok fair enough. The domain itself has been siezed by Chaturbate so what's written on there is their own opinion. But in the linked PDF, if you navigate around the legalise, it says they found that the domain name is too similar to chaturbate. That is their sole finding. They then repeat what Chaturbate claims about copyright infringement, but they don't make a finding on that. They say that because Recurbate didn't respond, they will take Chaturbate's claim as proven. About the copyright, they only say copyright infringement can't be used as a counter-argument for legitimate use of a domain name. AFAIK, this particular body can't sieze a domain due to copyright infringement alone, only the kinds of things they list in this finding (counterfeiting, fraud, hacking, etc). In other words, if the same website had a domain name that didn't sound like chaturbate, they wouldn't have been able to sieze it.
BREAKING NEWS: retard is too retarded to understand he's a retard
This is a good neutral overview to read in conjunction. Looks like Altman is basically trying to take over the company (which isn't a normal company) and go counter to its mission, and the board fired him for it.
No it doesn't. Try actually reading it.
Found an article about it.
Tl;dr - people sue NY Rainbow-Marxist scum regime and win. NY Rainbow-Marxist scum regime appeal and win. This will now be appealed and, hopefully, overturned, because it is insane.
The Hollywood Jews vs Woke Cult war is going to be awesome
And "affect" can also be a noun, as in "her affect was that of a feminist legbeard on her period".
n=144
guessing race based on a proxy
Academia must be dismantled.
Yep. China is demographically terminal. Barring a huge expansionist war, it's guaranteed to collapse economically within about 15 years. The only question is whether Rainbow-Marxism/wokeness will destroy the US before that. When that happens, all 3 major world powers of the 20th century will have been destroyed by Marxism (USSR, China, USA).
"The most hated scumbag emperor? It was one of us!"
It's even worse than you think: https://www.cspicenter.com/p/heading-towards-the-fiscal-cliff#details
Fun fact: this is common in charities, most of which are just grifts where the employees enrich themselves with exorbitant salaries and help themselves to a bottomless pit of petty cash for "work" expenses. NGOs are just end-boss charities.