The proposals also tell judges for the first time to consider whether older women who commit crimes may be experiencing changes in their mental health caused by the menopause.
Exactly lmao. Same thing is happening in the dating world, with more women wanting to be courted before giving up the pussy because they can't get a man to commit.
But seriously, there certainly are some worth courting imo but there's no good way to separate them from the rest. I don't think it's worth rolling those dice because ultimately you're putting half your net worth on the line.
They only do that for their potential beta providers. Chad still gets to bend that over in the club bathroom after thirty minutes of rehearsed pickup lines.
Yeah mostly true, but I'm referring to 30+ year old women who have been used by Chad's for 15 years and they are finally realizing it doesn't make them happy. Some of them are withholding even from Chad in the hopes that Prince Charming is real and will respect them.
But give it a year or two and they'll be back to their old ways.
Rehabilitation doesn't work when the deterrents NOT TO commit crimes aren't there. The police in the UK are cucked beyond belief, there's no death penalty for serious crimes and the public don't have easily available means of defence.
You're better off just releasing packs of German shepherds to control crime.
Rehabilitation was never the purpose of incarceration. The real reasons for imprisonment are retribution and segregation. Criminals must be punished and separated from society.
Rehabilitation is what they are 'said' to be offering instead of short prison services. So instead of isolating them your making them work near vulnerable people usually.
There may have been a time before prisons became commercial when rehabilitation was the desired outcome. The minute prisoners provided profits to a corporation, recidivism became more important than rehabilitation.
I'm going to assume you don't know this piece of information. Corporate prisons can sue States for lack of profits if they don't convict enough people. It's one of the little known things about the screwed up system.
Courts could soon be handing out more rehabilitative community sentences, rather than sending people to jail for short terms, under radical new plans.
I think you're thinking of the US system, the UK system seems to be barely holding together and the few friends I have in the UK that have ties to prison officers there tell me the private prisons are MUCH worse with gangs essentially owning the prison.
Title is clunky but correct. The guidelines only apply to short jail sentences, so everyone who would've otherwise been jailed for a short period won't be - except straight white men who will be jailed as per normal.
LOL! Noeyes is right. You made that whole bit about "straight, white men" up. I mean, sure, the way things are I bet that's actually what's going to happen... but, still... kinda fakenewsy, bro.
Though I wonder if the government is preparing for the arrival of Palestinians into the country. I mean, what's the point of importing a horde of violent, murderous savages if all you're going to do is keep sending them all to jail? How are they going to replace your current population when they are constantly locked up?
I'm confused how you don't know that no one likes a snarky, passive-aggressive bitch.
But, yeah, I did find what you're referring to. It was not in the op's link, but in the link to the "consultation" on the Sentencing Council's website. I had to unzoom the page, because the side-menu wasn't scrolling and it is all the way at the bottom of the page.
You are correct. I was reading comments and not the article. Typical American asshole behaviour, I know. However, now that you point it out, I do find it interesting how the dynamics differ between the two countries, even down to the structure of punishment.
🤡
Full-circle : "your honor, excuse this dumb broad, she had a hysteric moment due to her hormones and isn't responsible for her actions." ~Feminism.
Exactly lmao. Same thing is happening in the dating world, with more women wanting to be courted before giving up the pussy because they can't get a man to commit.
Are there any left worth courting and will I get in trouble for attempting to court them?
No, and yes.
But seriously, there certainly are some worth courting imo but there's no good way to separate them from the rest. I don't think it's worth rolling those dice because ultimately you're putting half your net worth on the line.
They only do that for their potential beta providers. Chad still gets to bend that over in the club bathroom after thirty minutes of rehearsed pickup lines.
Yeah mostly true, but I'm referring to 30+ year old women who have been used by Chad's for 15 years and they are finally realizing it doesn't make them happy. Some of them are withholding even from Chad in the hopes that Prince Charming is real and will respect them.
But give it a year or two and they'll be back to their old ways.
Rehabilitation doesn't work when the deterrents NOT TO commit crimes aren't there. The police in the UK are cucked beyond belief, there's no death penalty for serious crimes and the public don't have easily available means of defence.
You're better off just releasing packs of German shepherds to control crime.
Rehabilitation was never the purpose of incarceration. The real reasons for imprisonment are retribution and segregation. Criminals must be punished and separated from society.
Rehabilitation is what they are 'said' to be offering instead of short prison services. So instead of isolating them your making them work near vulnerable people usually.
Who has said this?
There may have been a time before prisons became commercial when rehabilitation was the desired outcome. The minute prisoners provided profits to a corporation, recidivism became more important than rehabilitation.
I'm going to assume you don't know this piece of information. Corporate prisons can sue States for lack of profits if they don't convict enough people. It's one of the little known things about the screwed up system.
The first line of the article:
I think you're thinking of the US system, the UK system seems to be barely holding together and the few friends I have in the UK that have ties to prison officers there tell me the private prisons are MUCH worse with gangs essentially owning the prison.
I like to think it's a quarantine. If someone is too dangerous to roam free, we isolate them until they are no longer dangerous.
in theory, anyway.
If the criminal cannot be rehabilitated then why not do the humane thing and just kill him?
"We need sensible dog control laws!"
-Hysterical UK leftists, probably
If you've paid any attention at all the past decade the "something" is already under way and has been in process for centuries.
"stop"?
i feel like you worded your title incorrectly. according to your words, White men will be getting shorter sentences. but it's the opposite, in fact.
ah, i see now. still, a rather confusing title.
Title is clunky but correct. The guidelines only apply to short jail sentences, so everyone who would've otherwise been jailed for a short period won't be - except straight white men who will be jailed as per normal.
EDIT: MY BAD (eyesight)!
LOL! Noeyes is right. You made that whole bit about "straight, white men" up. I mean, sure, the way things are I bet that's actually what's going to happen... but, still... kinda fakenewsy, bro.
Though I wonder if the government is preparing for the arrival of Palestinians into the country. I mean, what's the point of importing a horde of violent, murderous savages if all you're going to do is keep sending them all to jail? How are they going to replace your current population when they are constantly locked up?
I'm confused how it's fake news when it lists every group except straight white men....
I'm confused how you don't know that no one likes a snarky, passive-aggressive bitch.
But, yeah, I did find what you're referring to. It was not in the op's link, but in the link to the "consultation" on the Sentencing Council's website. I had to unzoom the page, because the side-menu wasn't scrolling and it is all the way at the bottom of the page.
Here, the actually relevant link.
EDIT: I suck at linking. Just go to the bottom of the page and scroll up until you see the title "Equality and Diversity."
It is in OP's link, it's the paragraph highlighted in blue.
Disregard everything I said before. I'm apparently going blind. Also, there's no blue highlight on my end.
Next time I visit family in Aberdeen, remind me to only speak Spanish in public.
Canada has already introduced reduced sentences for nonwhite offenders. At what point do you recognize the targeted genocide of Whites for what it is?
You are correct. I was reading comments and not the article. Typical American asshole behaviour, I know. However, now that you point it out, I do find it interesting how the dynamics differ between the two countries, even down to the structure of punishment.