6
NoEyesNoGroin 6 points ago +6 / -0

I downloaded his 2023 special after the first thing happened and didn't find him funny.

10
NoEyesNoGroin 10 points ago +10 / -0

One of the comments says this isn't as bad as the headline says: https://nitter.net/Quidnam/status/1734051265649250400#m

The entire frame of the article's headline comes from the third paragraph here -- which doesn't actually substantiate it.

The mere fact that he's sending a delegate doesn't mean much (or at least it's too soon to say).

8
NoEyesNoGroin 8 points ago +8 / -0

Plz don't link directly to ragebait like this.

5
NoEyesNoGroin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well said.

I think it goes all the way back to philosophic scepticism, which is at the root of nihilism. This mental disease was Aristotle's motivation for formalising logic, to show that philosophic scepticism is self-refuting.

43
NoEyesNoGroin 43 points ago +44 / -1

Progressivism (and all other forms of Marxist mental derangement) is build on the notion that being itself is a prison. This is never stated ofcourse (that would require self-awareness) but it underlies the psychology. Once you understand this, everything from Star Trek to this feminist tumour's delusions about her own female human nature make sense.

18
NoEyesNoGroin 18 points ago +18 / -0

Can anyone explain to me how someone, or some group, isn't suing them and easily winning and taking a bunch of free money? Lawyers chase ambulances but blatantly illegal shit like this they aren't interested in?

20
NoEyesNoGroin 20 points ago +20 / -0

Academia is infested with Progressives, aka Rainbow-Marxists.

1
NoEyesNoGroin 1 point ago +1 / -0

If that happened at all it certainly wasn't common. Countless things can skew results, that's why randomised controls are used.

2
NoEyesNoGroin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I use this extension and have been blissfully unaware of shorts for a while now.

34
NoEyesNoGroin 34 points ago +34 / -0

Where he says "women weren't required to be included in studies until 1993", what he really meant was "participating in studies is voluntary and mostly men volunteered, so women shot themselves in the foot, again, and now feminists and simps like me are blaming men for it, again".

22
NoEyesNoGroin 22 points ago +22 / -0

Sloppy seconds would be thousands and thousands of times an improvement for this digusting wizard sleeve.

25
NoEyesNoGroin 25 points ago +25 / -0

He's not even a nobody - he's a real estate agent.

22
NoEyesNoGroin 22 points ago +22 / -0

extends baton Pick up the verification can.

15
NoEyesNoGroin 15 points ago +15 / -0

Depression check is a foregone conclusion. I'd bet the entire gold reserves of the entire planet on it.

4
NoEyesNoGroin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Anyone have an archivable source for this, i.e., from a newspaper outlet?

15
NoEyesNoGroin 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yup, I haven't checked them for like 10 years but there are whole agencies that rate charities by how corrupt they are, or to be more precise, how much of the money they get actually ends up going to the people they claim to be helping. These days I wouldn't expect such agencies to not be corrupt themselves, though. However, the last time I checked, the majority of charities spent the majority of their money on themselves.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›