4
Mpetey123 4 points ago +4 / -0

I get subjective taste. A lot of Taker matches are his entrances. I quite like his style. Mark Calloway does seem less carny in retirement which is weird since he was so protective of kayfabe as a wrestler.

4
Mpetey123 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't think it was just being PG it was the lack of consistent storytelling and Vince's weird booking. Like ending the Taker's streak no one seems happy with it and it didn't serve anybody. Vince just did it to swerve the crowd.

-1
Mpetey123 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Be kinda funny because one of the things people teased Shaka about was having a small penis. So given stereotypes maybe he was white

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

His blackness is essential to his character.

5
Mpetey123 5 points ago +5 / -0

Arguing over viability is such a stupid hill for either side. Because they will constantly bevtrying to shift that line.

3
Mpetey123 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought it was okay. It goes out of it's way to paint McMahon in a positive light and skims over his personal life. It was more of a history of the WWE through McMahon's eyes than a McMahon biography. Which is a shame because it suggested a lot of interesting hints about McMahon's life.

6
Mpetey123 6 points ago +7 / -1

The whole series made me compelled to really find out more about Vince McMahon as a person. So much of his life was glossed over to get to his business and wrestling persona. They left a lot of meat on the bone. And some of the things Vince said without any pushback from the filmmakers, were intriguing.

It's amazing hearing wrestlers talk because you know they are always "working." They know why they are there and are usually accommodating.

Bret Hart is a mark for himself. If you ever heard Scott Hall talk about him he said, "Bret would argue for titles over money."

Trips is underated if anything. Phenomenal worker, Phenomenal character work, very good promo skills, I-uh understand-uh why-uh some people-uh don't-uh like-uh it though. I can't imagine the attitude era without Trips.

I enjoy Bishoff on his podcast and think he's smart and entertaining. But in this series they did play up smary Bishoff

43
Mpetey123 43 points ago +43 / -0

I'm so sick of this performative activision that targets working people. Go chain yourself to a private jet. Create human chains in the driveways of celebrities. Throw soup on Taylor Swift. You know target people who are actually doing damage according to your paradigm.

No you have to fuck up regular people just trying to live their lives. I hate these selfish fucks

1
Mpetey123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not to mention referring to it as a crisis.

5
Mpetey123 5 points ago +5 / -0

But Dan Quayle mispelled potato so that shows how dumb conservatives are.

14
Mpetey123 14 points ago +14 / -0

It's like a socialist explaining how it's vastly different from communism because the "private" companies own the means of production, even though the government owns the private companies

21
Mpetey123 21 points ago +21 / -0

Don't forgot cocaine in the White House, twice

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +2 / -0

The context is missing so who knows who is the butt of the joke

4
Mpetey123 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wonder if Military Contractors are going to fall under the definition of a militia?

42
Mpetey123 42 points ago +42 / -0

It's only troubling because no one's released the videos much less translated them. People aren't neo-NAZIs they are interested in the truth. They are tired of being told and selectively shown clips, and being treated like children.

2
Mpetey123 2 points ago +4 / -2

We don't get the full context of the joke. I will say him saying it while doing a Trump impersonation is probably more of a shot at Trump than Trudeau. The people are laughing at Trump being mocked not Trudeau.

Gillis isn't some righty comedian. People keep trying to paint him as a righty comedian but he's not.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›