5
Indipendepede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ask her if it's okay, then, if they 3D scan a sexy model specifically consenting to be sexualised in-game. What now, dipshit- does the character have agency or is a woman not allowed to sexualise her own likeness?

1
Indipendepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

While not the intention, it makes sense since they are constantly being gas lit!

1
Indipendepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

sexy woman

citation needed, or you are being... heavily generous with your assessment.

by folx
2
Indipendepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

And you know for a fact they'd probably clap like seals to any post of "what school never taught me".

5
Indipendepede 5 points ago +6 / -1

Imp, I don't usually downvote you, but I really didn't need that mental image. My own fault for reading the whole thing when I knew where it was going, but still, that was gross.

1
Indipendepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Illegals are covered under labour law" has the exact same energy as "You can't bring guns into a gun-free zone". Smoothest of smoothbrain Notes.

The illegals will be more afraid of deportation than the company will be of them going to court, so nobody will report it. Laws can't be enforced on crimes the authorities aren't aware of.

6
Indipendepede 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you can be held accountable for drunk driving, then you should be equally accountable for consenting to drunk sex. Sadly, they don't care about consistency, just power.

2
Indipendepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it's more the group than the anonymity- crowd mentality can easily push normal people in real life to do things they normally wouldn't even consider.

Jordan's biggest problem is that he's an "acceptable target", so he would still get trolled and receive death threats even if identities were exposed. Forced identification primarily hurts those who need to remain anonymous for their protection e.g. Christians in Muslim nations, whistle blowers etc.

1
Indipendepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, but you forget that men can also be fat and incompetent (and probably evil)!

They will never be happy unless they see a facsimile of themselves onscreen being hyper-competent and adored by all.

18
Indipendepede 18 points ago +18 / -0

Jordan, the reason we need anonymity is because nobody should have to lose their job, friends, family, and life ruined just because of trolling i.e. being an asshole. If you are an ass in real life, people will dislike you and react proportionately, but like anything else on the Internet, the mob will amplify the issue beyond any reasonable limit.

You literally were on the receiving end of this multiple times because your real identity was exposed by a random asshat that felt you deserved scrutiny from the entire world. The world likes nothing more than to pass judgement on someone it deems lesser- to the point you needed medicating for your mental health. Stop trying to inflict your trauma on everyone else.

8
Indipendepede 8 points ago +8 / -0

Doxing should be criminal offence and witness protection put in place to remove connection between the on-line persona and the IRL person (at doxer's expense).

4
Indipendepede 4 points ago +4 / -0

When all banks are condensed into MEGA BANK ONE, governments will only need to target one bank.

by folx
3
Indipendepede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cut them some slack; they don't actually know what respect is.

1
Indipendepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol. Now I'm curious what you'd call a "flock" of primordial oozes; coven would probably be accurate. Whatever weight class they fit into should sound large, like Jupiter class.

2
Indipendepede 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think you could argue that in order to count as being in a relationship with multiple people, you would first have to qualify as "people". If the author looks like primordial sludge, I hate to think what its' beta orbiters look like.

4
Indipendepede 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm honestly coming around to the opinion that anything even slightly tinged with "the gay" should go right back into the closet where it belongs. If "we just want to get married" leads this way, I'm more than happy to backtrack to that particular fork in the road and take the other path- you degenerates (the gays) had your chance.

5
Indipendepede 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is so far beyond true it's not even funny. Most female violence wouldn't even be considered violence let alone get reported. When you do report, you're a weak man who can't stand up to a woman, but if you do defend yourself, you get a personal lesson on the Duluth model.

6
Indipendepede 6 points ago +6 / -0

money printing machine

money vote printing machine

3
Indipendepede 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's not the "retard" who can't make a coherent argument. He might not even like or support loli, but we all know where this goes with free speech, so we defend it even if it's objectionable. Ban porn, not loli (before you say anything, YES, that means drawn porn too, but NO, loli is not drawn porn of little girls).

0
Indipendepede 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just because Yanks bastardised the term for their own usage doesn't change the definition. You are literally an ignorant foreigner misunderstanding a Japanese word because online debates have swung in that direction. Muddying a term until it's useless or deviates enough from the original meaning to confuse arguments is the left's greatest tactic.

Loli in anime doesn't actually refer to child porn- not even drawn. It's literally a type of character like muscle-man, thug, hero, Gal/Ganguro, and specifically evokes certain kinds of tropes.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›