She looks crazy enough to steal other people's children, insert them into her vagina and 'abort them'. Either way, 21 murders.
WhyNotBoth.gif
At that size, she weighs in on pretty much everything at the same time- usually in tonnes.
Once you pop, you just can't stop... because then you have to face the fact that you're a monster, so you keep doing it to hide from the reality of the situation.
lol, gg deep lore reference
Lol, less of a dartboard and more of a magnifying glass: "GUYS, CALL LEGAL, WE FOUND ANOTHER CHARACTER!"
That's a bold move assuming that the gaping flesh hole represented is a vagina.
Hopefully, the same happens to her medical license.
~~~~Turns out he's an American idiooooot~~~~~
It's even funnier when they do it with medical diagnoses; don't give black people the correct treatment because acknowledging that differences in physiology leads to different outcomes is wrong and racist and we need to "fix" the AI so all ethnicities are treated like white people.
All according to cake!
Jesus, that's an understatement and a half. OP wasn't kidding- it's literally the entire front page dedicated to seething.
Very lawful, actually- as long as they do everything through legal means. Fortunately, legal != moral. So, what you should be asking is:
How moral is a society in which sentences are determined by gender, skin colour or political affiliation?
abortion should be prohibited in all cases
You'd have a point if MargarineMongoose had said that at all. You can't argue the general concept of abortion for your side of the argument, but then apply the fringe cases to the other side.
Then I would not call the position morally bankrupt
That is literally the case in most places even where it's "banned" to one extent or another, but you made the point anyway.
I get to call him the same for supporting inflicting such massive trauma on some poor 12-year-old girl
And if you'd been arguing the fringe cases rather than the general concept, you'd be right. Instead, you took great pride in erecting a straw puppet of "things he never said" and knocking it down. Even if that is his opinion, the point stands that the baby is also innocent along with the victim, but that's another argument entirely.
Probably more convincing than anything else she has to say.
For real; who is impregnating that things, thumb-sexuals?
So, the rest of abortion should be okay because of the <0.5% of cases? You call that slight of hand persuasive? What if there's an allowance for rape/incest/life of mother like is allowed pretty much anywhere?
You're using an emotional, straw-man argument to justify baby murder.
Non-Christian and anti-abortion? Of course I know him, he's me!
It's funny that RGB waited because Hillary wasn't supposed to lose. Makes you think how many other plans were not only disrupted, but outright foiled just by Trump existing. HAHAHAHA
Always love that bit at the end- especially the flash of purple that hints at the hobo guardsman being saved by the chaos gods. Alfa is comic genius.
Can we find one more? I almost have "failed modern woman" Bingo
So, if a wealthy millionaire accrues massive amounts of debt, the courts would saddle his trophy housewife with millions in debt- equally split?
[X]
I'm sure what you're talking about is the negotiation of splitting assets and finances, not what is legally mandated by courts and judges as "compensation" for being a housewife. We're talking about the unfairness of alimony, which is an extraction of wealth regardless of debt.
Why should a man be able to dump his wife
.... not even gonna finish the whole thing- as if it's the men who initiate most divorce...
Heap fallacy
Fallacy doesn't mean it's wrong. I don't mean you wouldn't be able to do it accurately, I mean you shouldn't put a number on it at all. It's not a paid position or something requiring reimbursement. It's like billing your friend for a favour that didn't financially cost anything- you could put a number on it, but you shouldn't.
sacrificed work experience
That's your opinion. You've artificially deemed it a "sacrifice" instead of a choice. If she chooses to take a lower-paying job, is she entitled to the pay from her old job? No, that's dumb, and so is alimony. Divorcing is like quitting or getting fired- you don't get to keep a salary afterwards.
benefited the man
This isn't a 1-way street. The woman benefits too. Many would say the woman benefits more by not having to remain a corporate drone to put food on the table. You view marriage like a sacrifice of the woman that only benefits the man- I won't be able to make a convincing argument otherwise until you see marriage as equal partnership of 2 mutually consenting adults instead of "man inflicts spousal contract on woman".
She gets the earnings that expanded in the time that they were married, and debts acquired during the marriage, not pre-existing property or debts
Bull. Never heard of a woman having to pay after the man gets down on his luck.
Never said I supported that
That's what alimony is. Otherwise, why is alimony tied to the man's income?
Okay, I need to talk about the 'vagina suit' in the background.... WTF
Any bets on whether it looks better than hers or accurately depicts it? It definitely looks like it's supposed to be worn with your head sticking out of it. God help us all if that's what the next generation of pussy-hats look like: 'vagina robes'