The boldest was to have the Ontario government “formally declare intimate partner violence as an epidemic”
After COVID showed them how much they can get away with, they're now using the disease paradigm on everything, from non-existent racism to something that is a problem but not nearly as big as they make it out to be.
Since the triple homicide on 22 September 2015, 111 women in Ontario have been murdered by their current or former partner
So 111 in 7 years, less than 20 a year. That is less than 9% of the murders in Ontario each year, and ones for which it is least clear how you're going to stop pathetic losers whose response to rejection is murder - at least without becoming draconian police states or legalizing gun ownership.
The jury also recommended official prominence be given to the word “femicide”
It's a made up and ungrammatical word. Homicide means killing of a homo (man, human), what is a fema?
“A lot of the recommendations are groundbreaking,” said Pamela Cross, a lawyer and expert on intimate partner violence in Ontario who testified at the inquest.
The inquest, which heard from nearly 30 witnesses over three weeks, was meant to examine the systems that broke down in the weeks, months and years leading up to the day Basil Borutski got in a borrowed car, drove to Carol Culleton’s cottage and strangled her with a coaxial cable, then moved on to Anastasia Kuzyk’s house where he shot her to death and then to Nathalie Warmerdam’s farm where he shot her too.
That's a whole lot of 'self-defense'.
Or are you just glad that a few womenNazi gender members were murdered?
It doesn't work like that. You just said that any time a man murders his wife or girlfriend, it is 'self-defense'.
A bit like when they want to censor, they start with the stormcucks. Because they're indefensible.
Wait, so you know that they start censoring when it's someone they can more easily defend censoring, and still you supported censoring GC?
Or did you delude yourself into thinking that it was about their supposed hate for men, like you deluded yourself that the Democrats were turning on the womans because they supported drafting women?
What I said was that women being killed is not the problem they claim it is
Wrong. That is what I said. You said that it is not a problem at all, and you referred to all cases as 'self-defense'.
Me: "something that is a problem but not nearly as big as they make it out to be."
You: "Men using self-defense against violent women isn't a problem."
You finally sense that you went too far by advocating for literal murder? It will not be long before you become the next Marc Lepine.
Canadian media recently adopted as writing style guideline to highlight women getting killed as femicides / féminicides.
Because women are always special victims who need more exclusive ressources to feminists orgs, and men are an ever-increacing threat the needs adressing by more overbearing government and propaganda in schools and media.
Which was swiftly enacted with campaings shaming men because "hey dude, violence against women is NEVER okay. It stops now." Not a word about the more aboundant violence against men and boys though.
It's always "a crisis of misoginist male violence" which reflects on society as a whole when a woman is killed, but crickets when a woman tried to murder her two children, succeeding for one, at the begining of the lockdowns. Had the guy tried to go to a shelter for victims of domestic violence to hide with his kids, he would have been refused, because shelters refuse male victims or fathers of kids abused by the mother.
Duluth model in action.
Please ignore men are 2 to 3 times more likely to get killed, and 5 to 10 times more likell to die in a work accident. Apparently THAT is not a reflection of how society trivializes male deaths. The real victims are women. Always.
Men remain disposable as per usual
WhyNotBoth.gif
Why don't they just criminalize murder?
After COVID showed them how much they can get away with, they're now using the disease paradigm on everything, from non-existent racism to something that is a problem but not nearly as big as they make it out to be.
So 111 in 7 years, less than 20 a year. That is less than 9% of the murders in Ontario each year, and ones for which it is least clear how you're going to stop pathetic losers whose response to rejection is murder - at least without becoming draconian police states or legalizing gun ownership.
It's a made up and ungrammatical word. Homicide means killing of a homo (man, human), what is a fema?
EXPERT.
The inquest, which heard from nearly 30 witnesses over three weeks, was meant to examine the systems that broke down in the weeks, months and years leading up to the day Basil Borutski got in a borrowed car, drove to Carol Culleton’s cottage and strangled her with a coaxial cable, then moved on to Anastasia Kuzyk’s house where he shot her to death and then to Nathalie Warmerdam’s farm where he shot her too.
That's a whole lot of 'self-defense'.
Or are you just glad that a few
womenNazi gender members were murdered?It was preemptive self-defense!
Stormcucks are people who live in Tornado Alley.
It doesn't work like that. You just said that any time a man murders his wife or girlfriend, it is 'self-defense'.
Wait, so you know that they start censoring when it's someone they can more easily defend censoring, and still you supported censoring GC?
Or did you delude yourself into thinking that it was about their supposed hate for men, like you deluded yourself that the Democrats were turning on the womans because they supported drafting women?
Wrong. That is what I said. You said that it is not a problem at all, and you referred to all cases as 'self-defense'.
Me: "something that is a problem but not nearly as big as they make it out to be."
You: "Men using self-defense against violent women isn't a problem."
You finally sense that you went too far by advocating for literal murder? It will not be long before you become the next Marc Lepine.
Canadian media recently adopted as writing style guideline to highlight women getting killed as femicides / féminicides.
Because women are always special victims who need more exclusive ressources to feminists orgs, and men are an ever-increacing threat the needs adressing by more overbearing government and propaganda in schools and media.
Which was swiftly enacted with campaings shaming men because "hey dude, violence against women is NEVER okay. It stops now." Not a word about the more aboundant violence against men and boys though.
It's always "a crisis of misoginist male violence" which reflects on society as a whole when a woman is killed, but crickets when a woman tried to murder her two children, succeeding for one, at the begining of the lockdowns. Had the guy tried to go to a shelter for victims of domestic violence to hide with his kids, he would have been refused, because shelters refuse male victims or fathers of kids abused by the mother.
Duluth model in action.
Please ignore men are 2 to 3 times more likely to get killed, and 5 to 10 times more likell to die in a work accident. Apparently THAT is not a reflection of how society trivializes male deaths. The real victims are women. Always.
Did you know close to 50% of abortions happen to women?
Let us come together to ban the legal murder of defenseless women.
It's less than 50%.
More and more men will opt out of doing the society thing.
Already most young men don't want to get married.. I guess they want that to be a 100% reason there will be no marriages and no kids.
I fucking hate this country I hope it burns to the ground so I can become a warlord.
There is so much Canada has to be sorry for lately...
Who?