The inquest, which heard from nearly 30 witnesses over three weeks, was meant to examine the systems that broke down in the weeks, months and years leading up to the day Basil Borutski got in a borrowed car, drove to Carol Culleton’s cottage and strangled her with a coaxial cable, then moved on to Anastasia Kuzyk’s house where he shot her to death and then to Nathalie Warmerdam’s farm where he shot her too.
That's a whole lot of 'self-defense'.
Or are you just glad that a few womenNazi gender members were murdered?
It doesn't work like that. You just said that any time a man murders his wife or girlfriend, it is 'self-defense'.
A bit like when they want to censor, they start with the stormcucks. Because they're indefensible.
Wait, so you know that they start censoring when it's someone they can more easily defend censoring, and still you supported censoring GC?
Or did you delude yourself into thinking that it was about their supposed hate for men, like you deluded yourself that the Democrats were turning on the womans because they supported drafting women?
What I said was that women being killed is not the problem they claim it is
Wrong. That is what I said. You said that it is not a problem at all, and you referred to all cases as 'self-defense'.
Me: "something that is a problem but not nearly as big as they make it out to be."
You: "Men using self-defense against violent women isn't a problem."
You finally sense that you went too far by advocating for literal murder? It will not be long before you become the next Marc Lepine.
The inquest, which heard from nearly 30 witnesses over three weeks, was meant to examine the systems that broke down in the weeks, months and years leading up to the day Basil Borutski got in a borrowed car, drove to Carol Culleton’s cottage and strangled her with a coaxial cable, then moved on to Anastasia Kuzyk’s house where he shot her to death and then to Nathalie Warmerdam’s farm where he shot her too.
That's a whole lot of 'self-defense'.
Or are you just glad that a few
womenNazi gender members were murdered?It was preemptive self-defense!
A bit like when they want to censor, they start with the stormcucks. Because they're indefensible.
But what do I know, it's not like this exact same playbook happened in my birth country.
First it was "protect women from random murderers"
Then it was "protect women from being killed by violent partners"
Then it was "protect women from coercive partners"
Then they dropped all pretenses and let us watch them defend a man in a wheelchair being beaten to death.
It doesn't work like that. You just said that any time a man murders his wife or girlfriend, it is 'self-defense'.
Wait, so you know that they start censoring when it's someone they can more easily defend censoring, and still you supported censoring GC?
Or did you delude yourself into thinking that it was about their supposed hate for men, like you deluded yourself that the Democrats were turning on the womans because they supported drafting women?
No I didn't. What I said was that women being killed is not the problem they claim it is, because they've played this game before.
Wrong. That is what I said. You said that it is not a problem at all, and you referred to all cases as 'self-defense'.
Me: "something that is a problem but not nearly as big as they make it out to be."
You: "Men using self-defense against violent women isn't a problem."
You finally sense that you went too far by advocating for literal murder? It will not be long before you become the next Marc Lepine.
Stormcucks are people who live in Tornado Alley.