What I said was that women being killed is not the problem they claim it is
Wrong. That is what I said. You said that it is not a problem at all, and you referred to all cases as 'self-defense'.
Me: "something that is a problem but not nearly as big as they make it out to be."
You: "Men using self-defense against violent women isn't a problem."
You finally sense that you went too far by advocating for literal murder? It will not be long before you become the next Marc Lepine.
Besides, didn't you earlier claim that I actually am a woman?
I have no desire to harm anyone, I'm not a woman.
Because women commit most murders and assaults. Oh right, it's all covered up by KIM POTTER!
They have done this before, pointing to these kinds of stories, and then slowly reducing the level of harm they want to be protected from, until you've got courts clapping like trained seals for pre-meditated murder of a disabled man.
This all has nothing to do with you labeling the murder of intimate partners as not a problem at all and declaring it to be self-defense.
So what was the reference to self-defense about then, eh? Which instances of a woman being killed were 'self-defense'? Let me guess, all of them, because the Nazi gender is trying to kill you?
My suspicion about you has always been that you spend too much time talking to TERFs and delude yourself into thinking they aren't evil.
It does not matter to me. Evil or not does not prevent people from serving as cannon fodder, whether it's you or TERFs. They're certainly less evil than you.
I don't believe you're a woman, because you'd have called me an incel by now.
Come now, even women do not call 6'7" guys incels...
I said desire, not actually following through.
Women are bad because some post comments on Twitter, rather than actually harming people. Makes perfect sense.
People get murdered and there's nothing you can do about it
That's what I said in my first comment, dumbass. But you decided to call it "not a problem" and to assert that it's all just self-defense.
I didn't read the whole article
You didn't even read my comment, or you ignored it.
Wrong. That is what I said. You said that it is not a problem at all, and you referred to all cases as 'self-defense'.
Me: "something that is a problem but not nearly as big as they make it out to be."
You: "Men using self-defense against violent women isn't a problem."
You finally sense that you went too far by advocating for literal murder? It will not be long before you become the next Marc Lepine.
You're one to talk about acting like a woman.
Besides, didn't you earlier claim that I actually am a woman?
Because women commit most murders and assaults. Oh right, it's all covered up by KIM POTTER!
This all has nothing to do with you labeling the murder of intimate partners as not a problem at all and declaring it to be self-defense.
So what was the reference to self-defense about then, eh? Which instances of a woman being killed were 'self-defense'? Let me guess, all of them, because the Nazi gender is trying to kill you?
It does not matter to me. Evil or not does not prevent people from serving as cannon fodder, whether it's you or TERFs. They're certainly less evil than you.
Come now, even women do not call 6'7" guys incels...
Women are bad because some post comments on Twitter, rather than actually harming people. Makes perfect sense.
That's what I said in my first comment, dumbass. But you decided to call it "not a problem" and to assert that it's all just self-defense.
You didn't even read my comment, or you ignored it.