Thank you for reminding me of the feminist idiocy surrounding the slave Leia scene - where an enslaved woman chokes her enslaver to death with the chain he used to shackle her, and despite him not only being killed, but being disgusting bloated slug-thing, feminists looked at this scene and decided it was glorifying the enslavement of women because it had the temerity to dress a sex slave in a bikini that was, all things considered, less revealing that what you'd see many women wearing at any American beach or swimming pool, even in 1983.
Don't have an autistic focus on dialectic, rhetoric is perfectly valid also. More convincing to many people in fact. Attacking both her points and her appearance is the way to go. We have a natural repulsion towards sick looking people giving disturbing arguements. The folly of her choices is evident just by looking at her. So why not point that out. Mockery is a powerful rhetorical tool.
Do you even know what rhetoric is? It's definitely not a fair and rational comparison of physical appearances. Rhetoric is very much the unfair, dirty fighting side of politics and people influencing.
All the autists trying to reshape the world with handfuls of their ultra rational peers need to realize they are always going to be vastly outnumbered by the much less rational populace and plan accordingly, if they don't want their asses beaten by one rhetorician and his army of useful idiots.
See this is where I'm sure you don't understand what's happening.
Because you, personally and rightly, may not give value to the political opinions of the hot and famous are. But it's definitely not no-one caring. Huge numbers of people in fact are influenced by them, and deciding to stick your head in the sand and declare them non-existent doesn't change that. Ignore them and try to seriously oppose the politics espoused by said hot starlets and you're just going to get crushed by that same huge number of idiots.
Rhetoric is words and language, words and language specifically chosen with the intent to elicit emotional short-circuits that will over-ride rational thought and get people to think and act in a way the rhetorician wants. And sometimes the emotional switch is "holy fuck they're ugly, I want nothing to do with that"
Yes, someone claimed that facts/evidence/logic/reason and even feelings weren't very convincing arguments (oh, it was you) and I provided them an example.
You're in a different thread now and here we're joking around and shooting the shit.
The Reddit hivemind connoisseurs of fart sniffing and the daily show never stopped making fun of buck toothed rednecks, and that somehow that never stopped them.
Her claims are absurd and so is her appearance, which in a holistic sense is relevant because of course your brain is more likely to come up with retarded ideas when it's stewing in a biological cesspit.
So true. Hutts get pregnant too, but nobody talks about it. Glad a representative of the species was able to remind us of this.
All I heard was "UNTAT GOONTAT...SOLOOOO"
HO HO HO
Thank you for reminding me of the feminist idiocy surrounding the slave Leia scene - where an enslaved woman chokes her enslaver to death with the chain he used to shackle her, and despite him not only being killed, but being disgusting bloated slug-thing, feminists looked at this scene and decided it was glorifying the enslavement of women because it had the temerity to dress a sex slave in a bikini that was, all things considered, less revealing that what you'd see many women wearing at any American beach or swimming pool, even in 1983.
For real; who is impregnating that things, thumb-sexuals?
Have I mentioned physiognomy this week? Because it is getting increasingly relevant.
krispy kreme gendered?
no, only women get abortions. none of those other things you listed exist.
It can barely breath. Holy shit there are so many wastes of life out there anymore.
I'm getting "Honey I blew up the baby" vibes.
Which is especially ironic in the context of what she's (further) losing her mind over
lol.. the one ones interested in that are scrawny white dudes 1/4th her weight or a black guy lol
It gets out of breath if it talks for more than five seconds.
Don't have an autistic focus on dialectic, rhetoric is perfectly valid also. More convincing to many people in fact. Attacking both her points and her appearance is the way to go. We have a natural repulsion towards sick looking people giving disturbing arguements. The folly of her choices is evident just by looking at her. So why not point that out. Mockery is a powerful rhetorical tool.
Do you even know what rhetoric is? It's definitely not a fair and rational comparison of physical appearances. Rhetoric is very much the unfair, dirty fighting side of politics and people influencing.
All the autists trying to reshape the world with handfuls of their ultra rational peers need to realize they are always going to be vastly outnumbered by the much less rational populace and plan accordingly, if they don't want their asses beaten by one rhetorician and his army of useful idiots.
See this is where I'm sure you don't understand what's happening.
Because you, personally and rightly, may not give value to the political opinions of the hot and famous are. But it's definitely not no-one caring. Huge numbers of people in fact are influenced by them, and deciding to stick your head in the sand and declare them non-existent doesn't change that. Ignore them and try to seriously oppose the politics espoused by said hot starlets and you're just going to get crushed by that same huge number of idiots.
Rhetoric is words and language, words and language specifically chosen with the intent to elicit emotional short-circuits that will over-ride rational thought and get people to think and act in a way the rhetorician wants. And sometimes the emotional switch is "holy fuck they're ugly, I want nothing to do with that"
Do you even know where you are?
99.9% (you being the 0.1%) already agrees and don't need any more convincing.
Go back to reddit, you're confused.
Yes, someone claimed that facts/evidence/logic/reason and even feelings weren't very convincing arguments (oh, it was you) and I provided them an example.
You're in a different thread now and here we're joking around and shooting the shit.
The Reddit hivemind connoisseurs of fart sniffing and the daily show never stopped making fun of buck toothed rednecks, and that somehow that never stopped them.
Her claims are absurd and so is her appearance, which in a holistic sense is relevant because of course your brain is more likely to come up with retarded ideas when it's stewing in a biological cesspit.
Ah, I see you only cleave to cold rationality for about as long as most people do once something heats up their emotions.
Tell me more about how only destroying their arguments with facts and logic has social power.