I think a lot are just scared of saying no and being labeled as an anti-vax doctor or something.
My mother had covid a few months back, it barely hurt her, she is super healthy for her 60s age, but she has a hereditary severe blood clot risk.
Doctor said she shouldn't get it, yet she is still in fear eventually being forced to.
Everyone prays for the downfall of you as a female athlete.... vs other females..... so if I really hated females winning it wouldn't do anything cause a female is going to win?
No it is cause you are a selfish lame-o to put it nicely.
Yeah but no one ever sees it that way is what is so gross about this all. They vote in the exact policies and people who do stuff they hate, but it is always spun as "well the other party ruined it all" when THEY the people voted for it.
So they just vote it all in again next time.... They never learn and that would be fine I would say let it all burn cept it hurts everyone else who didn't vote that garbage in .
I was watching the gymnastics with my mother the other day because she quite enjoys that. It is the most obnoxious thing that they cut to Simone Biles like every single breather they have. It makes no sense. Politics aside, she is just out of the relevance of these events anymore. Yet they keep cutting to her like she is some hero.
Well the problem is so often it is asylum from some undefined thing that doesn't exist [I am not sure if you are referring to a specific incident but I am talking more generally].
So you have person from country X wanting to come to the US. They claim asylum or refugee or whatever. But country X doesn't really have anything special going on in the way of persecution other than people in country X are poor. But, they get let in anyway but there was never any real "reason". No one was specially persecuting them or anything. So there is no real reason. So, they come but because no actual reason was ever defined other than "poor".... well nothing ever ends to say "ok everyone go back now."
Not sure if they are talking about female video game players or female characters in games...
But if you legit compare the two..... Men are treated as garbage in video games. As basic trash obstacles you have to shoot to get through the level. I mean talk about dehumanizing men are almost all worthless garbage evil people in every video game there is short of maybe one main character that is cool or something. You get some exceptions like zombie games where it is more even... but still
About the same in movies, tv shows, heck often times in real life war. Men are just worthless fodder, but then they complain when a woman dies in a game/movie/ect that it is treated as some huge tragedy [ok clearly sometimes that woman is just there to eventually die for drama points, but still kinda proves my point].
So I am just saying, if you really want women being equal etc then I think you are right. They would be saying that more enemy fodder in video games need to be women.
Personally I don't like having to kill women in video games :P Just me....
Yeah the draft thing that happened or is going to happen is a bit silly. Oh sure they may be "drafted" but how many are truly going to be drafted to front line infantry or something dangerous if we really did have to have another draft? Prob none.
Actually yes I do agree with you. Those were quite good looking the enemy sprites and battle backgrounds. I honestly don't know about the Pixel Remaster versions, I guess they are supposed to be like the originals more visually?
Yeah you are right though that did remind me those sprites were done well in that regard.
FFV was terrible on Steam. I am sorry but look at this:
https://www.fortressofdoors.com/content/images/2015/09/ffvgarbagezoom.jpg
That is how literally most of the background spritework was done in that "remake." It is astonishing to think that a game made by a big company by square enix would send that out as acceptable, when it wasn't like that in the original game.
FFV was my fave FF game too. Such a great game, but yeah that version was utter trash. Not to mention a lot of the artwork they added like the character portraits were just bad. Either way though, this is messed up :P
I guess I jsut wanted to point out again how much of a bad job was done in that original FFV game.
I have posted on this before on here, but I think it is worth repeating: If you actually delve into their own content such as their own lgbta wiki... and see what they actually have there it becomes quite clear gender is almost a meaningless term. Gender is basically a personality trait/quirk/obsession to them in most cases. I mean by their definition it makes sense. For example on the comments on that wiki someone asks the question: "Ok so sex is like the parts you have and gender is how you feel" and someone responds with yes. So gender literally is personality trait/quirk/or obsession to them.
Seriously check out this:
https://lgbta.wikia.org/wiki/Category:Gender
and scroll down to the alphabetized list. It is INSANE. Hundreds of genders, and legit every single one has a flag almost.
ADHD Gender, OSGender [you identify as windows linux or mac OS], Floatgender, Ditzygender [basically you are ditzy or aloof it says], dragongender and more.
Here is a fun one I just found: Ph4ntomzgender. From their wiki:
"Ph4ntomzgender, or phantomzgender, is a non-binary and agender, yet masc-aligned gender. It feels masculine in the way a feminine blue is masculine. It often changes like a "stringy glob monster," and can sometimes melt into another gender. It feels like a demonic eldritch beast, but can also sometimes feel human" --- That one is more normal sounding than most of them...
Or "Starcollector": From their wiki:
"Starcollector is when somebody collects genders related to stars and other space related things. Examples of genders one might collect are Stargender, Spacecoric, or Caelgender. Those were just examples, as people can collect as many as they want. These can either be fluid, or static "
Wtf does it mean to even collect a gender?!
Fina example "Puddlegender":
"Puddlegender is a xenogender that is described through puddles. It can be combined with other gender(s) or used alone and by anyone. Sometimes it's cloudy, muddy, obscure, and sometimes it's clear as day. It can be a big or small puddle and it can have any components in it. Leaves, ice, etc., and of course, water. There can be ripples if so much as a drop is added, or it can be still and calm. Sometimes it grows, sometimes it shrinks, sometimes it stays for days and sometimes it's completely evaporated. But it's still there, waiting to form a puddle again. "
They even have different gender "alignment systems" for categories of gender paradigms such as crystal alignment system, galactic alignment system, color alignment [including things like Paintgender for multiple genders in that system]. Or then they have general terms like Octogender for if you are someone with exactly 8 genders.
My point is, at this point gender even to them is a virtual meaningless term. They are one step away from accepting that by their definition literally just means your specific personality meaning everyone just has their own gender known as themselves.
That is the big distinction here. I got no issue with the vaccine existing and being available. In fact it is quite amazing how fast they made it, and in part to Trump.
The problem I have with it, is for one few are being honest about the potential risk factors and two that everyone should get it despite the risk factors for certain age groups of the vaccine outweighing the risk of the actual disease. Instead of reasonable risk assessment it became EVERYONE SUBMIT AND TAKE YOUR SHOT!
Even if Trump said something offhand like "Ok vaccine is available everyone go get your shot!".... judging by the context he isn't saying it the same way the SJWS and Biden are saying it. I think he would fully understand that it isn't for everyone through a risk assessment if you explained it to him and accept that and it what he said [in this speculative thing being said] would be more of a general statement and not to be taken too literally as a universal statement.
I honestly don't know, but is it common [and even if it is, is it smart] to do this in such a big stakes game in the game winning situation? I legit don't know just trying to figure it out.
As someone who doesn't follow the sport, it does seem incredibly stupid to lose the big championship by putting less than your best in for what WILL decide the game. I could see in like earlier matches in a tourny or something it not being a big deal doing it but I dunno?
Lolyeah it is crazy how much they have changed. Honestly makes me think they never really cared and instead it was always just party politics.
Honestly I don't mind the gov spying on other nations. I say spy away and spy as mjuch as possible. When you get to spying on citizens though.... that is a totally different thing and where I draw the line.
I am sorry but how in the world is this sort of spying, listening into private messages which would be illegal if any citizen did it to another citizen, not an unwarranted search? [Oh I guess some judge just throws out a general warrant that makes all ok? that is messed up if so]
I actually like a lot of the core libertarian principles and I generally have similar first principles as the origin of the libertarian views. However.... Big L Libertarians screw those guys man they suck mostly except a few xD. They really take things in a wild direction that doesn't even logically flow. Not saying little l libertarian views are perfect...but still...
But but buuuuuut remember health care is a human right A RIGHT!!!!!!!